Richards v. State of Connecticut Dept. of Corrs.U.S. District Court FREE SPEECH UNION Richards v. State of Connecticut Dept. of Corrs., 349 F.Supp.2d 278 (D.Conn. 2004). A state corrections officer The examples and perspective in this article or section may not represent a worldwide view of the subject. Please [ improve this article] or discuss the issue on the talk page. brought a suit alleging violations of his free speech, due process and equal protection rights. The district court entered summary judgment in favor of upon the side of; favorable to; for the advantage of. See also: favor the defendants. The court held that the alleged failure to make a union steward Union Steward (aka Shop Steward) is the title of an official position within the organizational hierarchy of a labor union. Its uniqueness lies in the fact that rank-and-file members of the union hold this position voluntarily (through democratic election by fellow workers available to the officer was not a substantive due process The substantive limitations placed on the content or subject matter of state and federal laws by the Due Process Clauses of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments to the U.S. Constitution. violation. The court found that the investigation into an alleged incident of workplace violence, even if inappropriate, was not an adverse employment action upon which the officer could base a free speech claim. The court held that a major's alleged conduct, including yelling yell v. yelled, yell·ing, yells v.intr. To cry out loudly, as in pain, fright, surprise, or enthusiasm. v.tr. To utter or express with a loud cry. See Synonyms at shout. n. expletives at the officer while the officer was sick in a bathroom, were unprofessional and unnecessary but did not shock the conscience and thus did not violate the officer's substantive due process rights. (Osborne Correctional Institute, Connecticut) |
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Printer friendly
Cite/link
Email
Feedback
Reader Opinion