Printer Friendly
The Free Library
14,505,585 articles and books
Member login
User name  
Password 
 
Join us Forgot password?

Rev. Proc. 2005-24 requires spousal waiver to avoid CRT disqualification.


The IRS An abbreviation for the Internal Revenue Service, a federal agency charged with the responsibility of administering and enforcing internal revenue laws.  recently issued controversial Rev. Proc. 2005-24, requiring spousal waivers to avoid disqualification of certain charitable remainder trusts (CRTs), regardless of whether they are charitable remainder annuity trusts or unitrusts.

Background

Virtually all common law states provide a statutory right to a surviving spouse, allowing him or her to elect to receive a statutory portion of the probate estate of u deceased spouse in lieu of amounts bequeathed to the survivor under the decedent's testamentary plan. Some states have gone further, enacting "augmented share" provisions that allow claims against assets outside the probate estate (such as lifetime gifts or inter virus trusts). The IRS is concerned that such statutes could result in a surviving spouse having a claim against assets otherwise passing to a charity via a CRT (1) (C RunTime) See runtime library.

(2) (Cathode Ray Tube) A vacuum tube used as a display screen in a computer monitor or TV. The viewing end of the tube is coated with phosphors, which emit light when struck by electrons.
.

New Rule

Accordingly, Rev. Proc. 2005-24 requires u spouse to affirmatively waive the right to elect against CRT property for all CRTs created after June 27, 2005 in states with augmented share provisions. Existing CRTs can also be affected if u surviving spouse actually exercises a right of election under a state statute.

Strategy

Rev. Proc. 2005-24 has the potential to put tax advisers at great risk if a waiver is not obtained, as it will disqualify a CRT. AICPA AICPA

See American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA).
 Tax Division members with clients owning or interested in CRTs are encouraged to read the procedure carefully to identify situations in which immediate action may be required. The AICPA Tax Division's Trust, Estate and Gift Tax TRP's CRT Task Force continues to analyze this procedure and is considering commenting to the IRS.

by Steven A. Thorne, CPA (Computer Press Association, Landing, NJ) An earlier membership organization founded in 1983 that promoted excellence in computer journalism. Its annual awards honored outstanding examples in print, broadcast and electronic media. The CPA disbanded in 2000. , Deloitte Tax LLP LLP - Lower Layer Protocol , Chicago, IL, and Vice Chair, AICPA Tax Division's Trust, Estate and Gift Tax Technical Resource Panel (TRP Trp tryptophan.

TRP

traumatic reticuloperitonitis.


Trp

tryptophan.
), and Eileen Sherr, CPA, MT, AICPA Tax Division Technical Manager
COPYRIGHT 2005 American Institute of CPA's
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2005, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:charitable remainder trusts
Author:Thorne, Steven A.
Publication:The Tax Adviser
Date:Jul 1, 2005
Words:296
Previous Article:Coordinated issue paper on S Corps.(FROM THE IRS)
Next Article:IRS to host forums for tax advisers.(News Notes)
Topics:



Related Articles
Charitable contributions of closely held stock.
Significant recent developments in estate planning.
Is your S election really late. (S corporation tax election)
Late election relief under Rev. Procs. 97-48 and 98-55.(IRS Revenue Procedures concerning S corporation elections)
The benefits of CRATs.(charitable remainder annuity trusts )
IRS updates late-election procedures.
Revised procedures for relief from late S elections.
Certain partners and S corp. shareholders can spread income from short tax year.
Taxpayer-friendly guidance on the 60-day IRA rollover waiver.(individual retirement account)
Electing to defer advance payments under Rev. Proc. 2004-34.

Terms of use | Copyright © 2009 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters | Submit articles