Printer Friendly
The Free Library
23,403,340 articles and books


Religious right-backed marriage amendment fails in House vote.

Religious Right-led efforts to add a "Federal Marriage Amendment" (FMA) to the Constitution failed Sept. 30 when the House of Representatives was unable to muster the necessary two-thirds vote to approve the proposed revision.

The amendment, H.J.Res. 106, received a majority vote of 227-186 but fell far short of the 276 House votes required to pass a constitutional amendment. The GOP leadership supported the bill, and the tally generally followed party lines. Twenty-seven Republicans broke ranks to oppose the measure, while 36 Democrats supported it.

Had it passed, the amendment still would have had to have won a two-thirds vote in the Senate and achieve ratification by three-fourths of the states before becoming part of the Constitution.

President George W. Bush issued a statement expressing disappointment with the vote.

"Because activist judges and local officials in some parts of the country are seeking to redefine marriage for the rest of the country, we must remain vigilant in defending traditional marriage," Bush said.

Amendment backers knew that the FMA--renamed the "Marriage Protection Amendment" just before going to the floor--had no chance of passage. Observers said the carefully staged vote was an election-year ploy to give the Religious Right a "culture war" issue to use in the November elections.

Americans United blasted the stunt, noting that the amendment had already been voted down in the Senate in July. Given the Senate's rejection of the FMA, there was no compelling reason for the House to vote.

"The Senate has already sidetracked this divisive and unwise amendment," said Barry W. Lynn, executive director of Americans United. "The only reason for this vote is to give the Christian Coalition and similar groups another line item on their biased 'voter guides.'

"It's sad to see the House act at the behest of extreme groups like the Christian Coalition and the Family Research Council," he said.

The constitutional amendment, which was heavily promoted by Religious Right organizations, would limit marriage to one man and one woman, reflecting evangelical church teaching. It is designed to outlaw same-sex marriages, but critics charge that it would also jeopardize civil unions and other legal protections.

During floor debate, proponents mostly avoided religious language and tried to portray the FMA as a necessary step to protect traditional marriage. But one member, U.S. Rep. Roscoe Bartlett (R-Md.), wandered off message, citing the Book of Genesis and asserting, "God created Adam and Eve, He didn't create Adam and Steve."

Americans United says the proposal, introduced by Rep. Marilyn Musgrave (R-Colo.), is unnecessary. The watchdog group notes that some religious traditions recognize same-sex unions and some do not. The government, AU says, should not elevate the views and practices of certain faith groups over others.

Lynn noted that during a national meeting of the Christian Coalition in Washington, D.C., Sept. 23-25, Coalition activists bragged that they would distribute millions of "voter guides" this year. In addition, the Family Research Council has pledged to include three FMA-related votes on its congressional scorecards this year.

These and other Religious Right groups, Americans United asserts, were eager to get a vote on the FMA, put the results on guides and scorecards and use them to try to tip the balance in close House races around the country.

A wide array of religious organizations oppose the amendment. Prior to the vote, more than two dozen faith groups sent a letter to House members, urging them to reject the FMA. Among the signers were: the Alliance of Baptists; the American Friends Service Committee (Quaker); the American Jewish Committee; the Episcopal Church, USA; the Loretto Women's Network (Catholic Order); the Lutheran Office for Governmental Affairs of the Evangelical Lutheran Church in America; the National Sikh Center; the Metropolitan Community Churches; the Office of the General Minister and President, Christian Church (Disciples of Christ); the Union for Reform Judaism; the Unitarian Universalist Association of Congregations and the United Church of Christ Justice & Witness Ministries.
COPYRIGHT 2004 Americans United for Separation of Church and State
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2004, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:People & Events
Publication:Church & State
Geographic Code:1USA
Date:Nov 1, 2004
Words:656
Previous Article:America's Legacy of Religious Liberty: pass it on!
Next Article:Calif. missions bill passed by the Senate.
Topics:



Related Articles
Marriage proposal: religious right, political allies launch crusade to alter constitution.
Confused conservatives: the GOP can't seem to make up its mind about the proposed constitutional amendment to ban gay marriage, and that, in the end,...
Gay marriage will be 'litmus test' in elections, says religious right.
Marriage amendment undercuts religious liberty, AU tells Congress.
Marriage proposals: while the attitudes of many Americans about gays are changing, recent court rulings, weddings, and proposals to amend the...
Unholy matrimony: President Bush, religious right join hands to push for marriage amendment.
Dobson Declares war for marriage amendment.
Court-stripping' bill "passes House with White House support.
The hate-crimes wedge.
Anger, yes. Despair, no: the election. We all thought it would be resolved over the issue of the war. And it was. But not simply by the war against...

Terms of use | Copyright © 2014 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters