Relief from partnership late-filing penalties.If a partnership files its return after the original due date, either without a timely extension request or after the extension period expires, the IRS An abbreviation for the Internal Revenue Service, a federal agency charged with the responsibility of administering and enforcing internal revenue laws. will likely assess a late-filing penalty under Sec. 6698, assuming the partnership's failure to file the return was not willful Intentional; not accidental; voluntary; designed. There is no precise definition of the term willful because its meaning largely depends on the context in which it appears. (thus, Sec. 7203 criminal penalties would not apply). As will be discussed, Rev. Proc. 84-35 may assist partnerships in avoiding the Sec. 6698 late-filing penalty in certain circumstances CIRCUMSTANCES, evidence. The particulars which accompany a fact. 2. The facts proved are either possible or impossible, ordinary and probable, or extraordinary and improbable, recent or ancient; they may have happened near us, or afar off; they are public or . Filing Rules Under Sec. 6031(a), a partnership is required to file a return annually and, according to according to prep. 1. As stated or indicated by; on the authority of: according to historians. 2. In keeping with: according to instructions. 3. Sec. 6031 (b), provide partners with a Schedule K-1. Regs. Sec. 1.6031 (a)-1 (e) (2) states the due date is the 15th day of the fourth month following the close of the partnership's tax year. Accordingly, for calendar-year partnerships, the return's due date is April 15 of the following year. Partnerships can automatically extend this date initially for three months by filing Form 8736, Application for Automatic Extension of Time To File U.S. Return for a Partnership, REMIC, or for Certain Trusts, on or before the original due date. Because this extension is automatic, the partnership does not have to provide a reason. The first extended due date is July July: see month. 15 of the following year. A partnership needing a second extension has to file Form 8800, Application for Additional Extension of Time To File a U.S. Return for a Partnership, REMIC, or for Certain Trusts, by the end of the first extension period, to request an extension of up to another three months. According to Form 8800's instructions, the partnership has to provide reasonable cause for requesting the second extension. If the full three-month period is granted, a calendar-year partnership can extend its return until October 15 of the following year. If the partnership does not follow these rules (but is not willful), the Service will likely assess a Sec. 6698 penalty, which is $50 per month (or fraction of a month)--not to exceed five months--multiplied by the number of partners in the partnership during any part of the tax year. Example: A calendar-year partnership with 10 partners discovers on Aug. 1, 2004, that its 2003 Form 1065, Partner's Share of Income (Loss) From an Electing Large Partnership, was not timely extended by April 15, 2004. It files that form by the end of August 2004. The IRS assesses a penalty of $2,500 (10 partners x 5 months x $50). Late-Filing Relief According to Sec. 6698(a), the Service will waive To intentionally or voluntarily relinquish a known right or engage in conduct warranting an inference that a right has been surrendered. For example, an individual is said to waive the right to bring a tort action when he or she renounces the remedy provided by law for such the late-filing penalty for reasonable cause, provided the partnership can meet that standard. Moreover, one district's interpretation of reasonable cause may not be consistent with that of other districts or employees, resulting in potential relief being granted only to some partnerships. Thus, "reasonable cause" is something to rely on only as a last resort. Many tax advisers may not realize that Rev. Proc. 84-35 grants automatic relief from Sec. 6698's late-filing penalties, in certain circumstances. If a partnership's facts are covered by the ruling, the IRS will withdraw the Sec. 6698 penalty assessment. Rev. Proc. 84-35 was discussed in detail in Service Center Advice (SCA (Single Connector Attachment) An 80-pin plug and socket used to connect peripherals. With a SCSI drive, it rolls three cables (power, data channel and ID configuration) into one connector for fast installation and removal. ) 200135029. Rev. Proc. 84-35 applies to partnerships not covered not covered Health care adjective Referring to a procedure, test or other health service to which a policy holder or insurance beneficiary is not entitled under the terms of the policy or payment system–eg, Medicare. Cf Covered. by the special rules in Secs. 6221-6234, on the tax treatment of "partnership items," added to the Code by the Tax Equity and Fiscal Responsibility Act of 1982. Under Sec. 6231(a)(1)(B), these provisions do not apply to partnerships "having 10 or fewer partners each of whom is an individual (other than a nonresident non·res·i·dent adj. 1. Not living in a particular place: nonresident students who commute to classes. 2. alien), a C corporation, or an estate of a deceased deceased 1) adj. dead. 2) n. the person who has died, as used in the handling of his/her estate, probate of will and other proceedings after death, or in reference to the victim of a homicide (as: "The deceased had been shot three times. partner." However, Rev. Proc. 84-35 was issued prior to the Taxpayer Relief Act of 1997, which significantly amended a·mend v. a·mend·ed, a·mend·ing, a·mends v.tr. 1. To change for the better; improve: amended the earlier proposal so as to make it more comprehensive. 2. Sec. 6231(a)(1)(B). When the procedure was issued, this section only exempted partnerships if (1) the partnership had 10 or fewer partners, each of whom was a natural person (other than a nonresident alien) or an estate and (2) each partner's share of each partnership item was the same as his or her share of every other item. Apparently, the Service takes the position that Rev. Proc. 84-35 applies only to partnerships exempt under the original version of Sec. 6231(a)(1)(B). Accordingly, under Rev. Proc. 84-35, the following partnerships will qualify, for an automatic waiver The voluntary surrender of a known right; conduct supporting an inference that a particular right has been relinquished. The term waiver is used in many legal contexts. of the Sec. 6698 late-filing penalty for a partnership return, if: * The partnership has 10 or fewer partners, all of whom are natural persons (other than nonresident aliens) or estates; * Each partner's share of each partnership item is the same as such partner's share of every other item; * The partnership can establish, if requested by the IRS, that all partners have fully reported their shares of income, deductions and credits on their timely filed returns. More Notice? In SCA 200135029, the Assistant Chief Counsel for Administrative Provisions and Judicial Practice, at the urging of a community organization, recommended that the IRS adopt procedures to inform partner ships of the relief granted by Rev. Proc. 84-35. It suggested that the Service include information on the possible application of the ruling with any late-filing penalty notice issued. The Service is not consistently providing this notice to partnerships; when it is, partnerships and their advisers are still generally unaware of the potential for relief. Conclusion If a partnership fails to qualify for relief under Rev. Proc. 84-35, it will have to rely on reasonable cause to avoid late filing penalties. If it fails to qualify under the procedure because, for example, it has one or more corporate (or other nonqualifying partners) that own only a small percentage of partnership equity, it might help to argue that the affected partnership should not be treated materially differently from a qualifying partnership simply because of the minimal amount of nonqualifying ownership. However, such partnerships will be at the mercy of the reviewer re·view·er n. One who reviews, especially one who writes critical reviews, as for a newspaper or magazine. reviewer Noun a person who writes reviews of books, films, etc. Noun 1. of the abatement A reduction, a decrease, or a diminution. The suspension or cessation, in whole or in part, of a continuing charge, such as rent. With respect to estates, an abatement is a proportional diminution or reduction of the monetary legacies, a disposition of property by will, when request. FROM THOMAS A. BOMAN, CPA (Computer Press Association, Landing, NJ) An earlier membership organization founded in 1983 that promoted excellence in computer journalism. Its annual awards honored outstanding examples in print, broadcast and electronic media. The CPA disbanded in 2000. , J.D., ADVANTAGE CAPITAL PARTNERS, ST. LOUIS, MO (NOT AFFILIATED WITH BAKER TILLEY INTERNATIONAL) |
|
||||||||||||||||

Printer friendly
Cite/link
Email
Feedback
Reader Opinion