Printer Friendly
The Free Library
14,758,148 articles and books
Member login
User name  
Password 
 
Join us Forgot password?

Reilly v. Grayson.


U.S. Appeals Court

COMPENSATORY DAMAGES A sum of money awarded in a civil action by a court to indemnify a person for the particular loss, detriment, or injury suffered as a result of the unlawful conduct of another.  

PUNITIVE DAMAGES Monetary compensation awarded to an injured party that goes beyond that which is necessary to compensate the individual for losses and that is intended to punish the wrongdoer.  

Reilly v. Grayson, 310 F.3d 519 (6th Cir. 2002). A prisoner brought a [section] 1983 action against prison officials alleging violation of his Eighth Amendment right to be free from cruel and unusual punishment Such punishment as would amount to torture or barbarity, any cruel and degrading punishment not known to the Common Law, or any fine, penalty, confinement, or treatment that is so disproportionate to the offense as to shock the moral sense of the community. . The district court entered judgment for the prisoner and awarded damages. The defendants appealed and the appeals court affirmed. The appeals court held that the prisoner had a right not to be exposed to environmental tobacco smoke environmental tobacco smoke (ETS/passive smoke),
n the gaseous by-product of burning tobacco products, including but not limited to commercially manufactured cigarettes and cigars; contains toxic elements harmful to the health of adults and children
 that presented a serious risk to his health, and to removed from places where smoke hovered. The court affirmed the lower court findings that the prisoner's asthma was a serious medical condition and that it was exacerbated by exposure to second-hand smoke, and that the defendants repeatedly failed to respond to repeated recommendations by medical personnel that the prisoner be moved to a smoke-free setting. The appeals court affirmed the award of actual damages rather than nominal damages in the amount of $36,500, and the award of punitive damages in the amount of $18,250. The court found no abuse of discretion in the district court's award of $51,786 in attorney's fees. (Michigan Department of Corrections The Michigan Department of Corrections oversees prisons and other correctional facilities in the state of Michigan, USA. It has some 43 prison facilities, 10 camps and a Special Alternative Incarceration program, together composing approximately 50,000 inmates. )
COPYRIGHT 2003 CRS, Inc.
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2003, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:administrative discretion of prison officials, failed to provide smoke-free environment
Publication:Corrections Caselaw Quarterly
Article Type:Brief Article
Geographic Code:1U3MI
Date:Feb 1, 2003
Words:198
Previous Article:Rasul v. Bush.(writ of habeas corpus)(Brief Article)
Next Article:Smith v. Board of County Com'rs. of County of Lyon.(LIABILITY)(Brief Article)
Topics:



Related Articles
Medical care.
Reilly v. Grayson.(CONDITIONS OF CONFINEMENT)(Brief Article)
Reilly v. Grayson.(CRUEL AND UNUSUAL PUNISHMENT)(Brief Article)
Reilly v. Grayson.(prisoner awarded punitive damages )(Brief Article)
Kelley v. Hicks.(CRUEL AND UNUSUAL PUNISHMENT)(Brief Article)
Kelley v. Hicks.(smoking)(Brief Article)
Burleson v. Glass.(prisoners sues prison officials of deliberately indifference)(Brief Article)
Johnson v. Pearson.(prisoner alleges prison officals for violating his 8th amendment rights)(Brief Article)
Johnson v. Pearson.(prisoner alleges prison officials of deliberate indifference)(Brief Article)
Medical care.(Hallett v. Morgan)(Gibson v. County of Washoe)(Fenner v. Suthers)(Evans v. Bonner)

Terms of use | Copyright © 2009 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters | Submit articles