Printer Friendly
The Free Library
5,675,610 articles and books
Member login
User name  
Password 
 
Join us Forgot password?

Regulatory mix and match.


The flurry of legislation proposed or adopted by the European Union European Union (EU), name given since the ratification (Nov., 1993) of the Treaty of European Union, or Maastricht Treaty, to the

European Community
 in the past few years has caused insurers to take notice, voicing support and caution. The new laws New Laws: see Las Casas, Bartolomé de.  shift more of the regulatory processes to the European Union and therefore offer a greater opportunity for homogeneity Homogeneity

The degree to which items are similar.
. The risk we face is that the homogeneous structure will not be as good as what some of the individual countries have," said Ernst Csiszar, president and chief executive officer of the Property Casualty Insurers Association of America.

For example, the United Kingdom has a principles-based approach to regulation. "The E.U. is not quite taking that approach," Csiszar said. "Their regulatory process is more like us--regulation upon regulation, rather than a principles approach."

Our cover story this month, "A New World Order" on page 28, takes a Big Picture look at the E.U. initiatives, including the Reinsurance The contract made between an insurance company and a third party to protect the insurance company from losses. The contract provides for the third party to pay for the loss sustained by the insurance company when the company makes a payment on the original contract.  Directive, the 8th Company Law Directive and Solvency II Solvency II is the updated set of regulatory requirements for insurance firms that operate in the European Union.

The rationale for European Union insurance legislation is to facilitate the development of a Single Market in insurance services in Europe, whilst at the same
, as well as recent U.S. laws and proposals, such as the Sarbanes-Oxley Act See SOX.  and the SMART Act, exploring how the new laws may affect the other jurisdiction.

"There will be pressure on out trade negotiators to look at how we're being regulated because of the E.U. regulations," Csiszar said. "We must make the operational side of out business less of the trade barrier we are perceived to be."

The European Union may be able to establish common regulations among its member countries, because it does thing by edicts, but enforcement will be a problem, Csiszar said. And the problem will be exacerbated when the European Union expands. "There are enormous differences between the old and new members," he said. "If they want homogeneity, they'll have to accept the regulatory processes in these new entrants."

"We have a good dialogue to understand how each other's system works--formal and informal dialogue between E.U. and U.S. regulators," Csiszar said. "Being able to work together has more to do with that than with having similar laws."

Sally Whitney is editor. You may reach her at (908) 4392200, Ext. 5340, by writing to A.M. Best Co., Ambest Road, Oldwick, NJ 08858, or by e-mail at sally.whitney@ambest.com. The e-mail address See Internet address.

e-mail address - electronic mail address
 for Best's Review is bestreview@ambest.com.
COPYRIGHT 2005 A.M. Best Company, Inc.
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2005, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:Editor's Prologue; Property Casualty Insurers Association of America
Author:Whitney, Sally
Publication:Best's Review
Article Type:Brief Article
Date:Dec 1, 2005
Words:374
Previous Article:Out of the ordinary: a growing number of policyholders are turning to unique insurance covers.(insurance policies)
Next Article:Quote/unquote *.(Comment)
Topics:



Related Articles
Agents Press Lawmakers on Issues.(insurance legislation)(Brief Article)
Staying the course: As insurers navigate the changing regulatory environment, they have set their sights on speed-to-market rules, which are in the...
The regulation debate: it was state vs. federal at a conference for the life insurance industry, and debaters found little common ground....
Opportunity for option: opinion: insurers and consumers would benefit from an optional federal regulatory system that encourages market competition....
The next step: U.K. insurance regulators are adding modeling requirements to monitor solvency and to evaluate risk. Could U.S. insurers benefit from...
A new world order: U.S. and European insurers debate demands of converging regulations.(Regulatory/Law)
Conseco Inc.(William Fritts appointed )(Brief article)
Federal charter supporters willing to pay the price.(Briefing)
Keeping watch.(Editor's Prologue)
NAIC 2006 models could spark debate in legislatures.(Briefing)

Terms of use | Copyright © 2009 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters | Submit articles