Reconsidering information literacy.
The delineated information explosion inevitably prompted moves---via the information literacy concept---to help survive the ensuing problematic information deluge through effective retrieval, evaluation, and efficient use. However, there are insistent calls for conceptual reconsideration because of the emerged negative connotation of "literacy" in this teaching-learning concept.
The much-heralded information explosion provided the opportunity for society to consider ways of instituting beneficial survival techniques for effective access, evaluation, and use of the ensuing information deluge. One of the seminal occurrences in this control-for-access move was the astute observation by Paul Zurkowski whose call for the conscious grooming of "information literates" (Behrens 1994, 310) duly heralded the information literacy (IL) concept (see Lee n.d.). A most likely profession--library and information science--unsurprisingly adopted this concept. From this perspective numerous writers have covered both prevailing and emerging issues (e.g., Breivik 1998; Breivik & Gee 1989; Bruce & Lampson 2002). In sum, this concept is aptly encapsulated in Behren's (1994, 310) conceptual and historical overview in which she highlights the "efficient and effective information location and utilization" essence of IL. The functional literacy aspect of IL has also been discussed by many a writer (e.g., Kuhlthau 1987). Unsurprisingly, a logical extension of the lifelong learning attribute of IL is the movement for lifelong access.  However, the pertinent literature attests to the divided opinions on this concept.
Inevitably, an information society has been created in which ready access to information has become crucial (see entries in Harrod's Librarians' Glossary, 1995; Lievrouw's entry in Encyclopedia of Communication and Information, 2002). A helpfully pertinent entry in the Dictionary of Library and Information Science (2004) provides both an illuminating definition and a conceptual framework for another look at this dominant concept:
Skill in finding the information one needs, including an understanding of how libraries are organized, familiarity with the resources they provide ... and knowledge of commonly used research techniques. The concept also includes the skills required to critically evaluate information content and employ it effectively, as well as an understanding of the technological infrastructure on which information transmission is based, including its social, political, and cultural context and impact. Synonymous with information skills. Compare with computer literacy (italics in the original).
This concept is now international (Ford 1994) thereby demonstrating the inexorable global march from traditional literacy---the 3Rs---to the burgeoning movement of change-reflective multiliteracies or multiple literacies. Although discussing the global learning concept, Ploman (1986, xxv) duly highlighted the changing realities and the current inadequacy of traditional literacy and observes how that "is now complemented by the expressed need for new, modern forms of literacy."
Delivery Approaches, Assessment and Standards
How do we fill the gap in the knowledge base of those identified as in need of information literacy? There is abundant literature on how to address this through the teaching-learning enterprise. For example, Shinew and Waiter's (2003) edited compilation of pertinent contributions on IL instruction for educators and another notable edited compilation--by Jacobson and Gatti (2001)--all highlight the delivery of IL; but a delineated persistent problem is the teaching of the cut-and-paste "Net generation" (Geck 2006; Roth 1999). Problematic in that that instant gratification generation is showing lack of the requisite discriminating and critical evaluation of the disparate sources of information and the need to appreciate the ethical issues of copyright and citing.
To promote ongoing assessment and ensure acceptable standards, some writers and institutions have proffered guidelines (e.g., Association of College & Research Libraries 2000; Maughan 2001; Meade & Dugger 2005). Should the delivery method be a stand-alone approach or across-curriculum integration? This central pedagogical question is prevalent in the literature with Breivik and Gee's (1989) "integrated learning" approach clearly dominating. Others have endorsed this integration approach as one of the "best practices" (e.g., Labelle & Nicholson 2005; Marcum 2002). 
Technology and its Aftermath
It is well documented that the technology-driven information explosion inevitably led to the quest for a "new literacy" (Breivik 1998, 1)--a need to address the emerging complex nature of information. The literature also attests to some inadvertent problems traceable to technology; for example, the emerged technostress (Brod 1984; Kupersmith 1992; Van Fleet & Wallace 2003; Wallace & Van Fleet 2001) and the newly delineated technocomplacency phenomenon (Doku 2006)--the former manifesting the stress and ensuing anxiety, and the latter technology-engendered smugness. The ensuing dominance of technology is also prevalent in the literature (e.g., Monke 2006; Swiss & Herman 2000; Taylor 2004; Wagner & Kozma 2003). Toffler's (1980, xxiii) metaphor of "colliding waves of change" creating a "new civilization" (p. xx) amply heralds this new era.
Inevitably, rapid technological advances have produced unforeseen circumstances, with regard to the change-and-anxiety phenomenon. Since Mellon's (1986) seminal library anxiety theory (see Brown, Weingart, Johnson, & Dance 2004) many writers have highlighted how the unprecedented pace of technological change is generating anxiety in the general populace (Atlas 2005; Gold 2005; Gross 2005; Jiao & Onwuegbuzie 2004; Labelle & Nicholson 2005; Shoham & Mirachi 2001; Tenopir 1990; Van Scoyoc 2003; Wagner 2006). Kaplan (2000, 208) aptly observes that the discourse is "saturated with familiar anxieties, and the vague forebodings of loss that so frequently accompany technological change." Therefore, for an effective IL process this emerged "negative affective" state (Jiao & Onwuegbuzie 2004, 138) demands serious consideration in the bid to alleviate anxiety.
Pejorative Misgivings and Rethinking Agitation
The prevailing intellectual dominance of IL does not necessarily imply ringing endorsement. This apparent anomaly has much to do with the l-word in information literacy. Who is information literate and, conversely, who is information illiterate?
Golden's encyclopedia entry (International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences 1968), which highlights the inevitable context-dependence of literacy, opined that: "If literacy is used in a historical or modern comparative context, then the implied contrast is with illiteracy. Literacy thus refers to the degree of dissemination among a society's population of the dual skills of reading and writing" (italics in the original).
Unsurprisingly, this circumscribed definition of traditional literacy is also highlighted in Olson's literacy discussion of the concept of "literate competence" in the International Encyclopedia of Education (1994) where he discusses the persistent unease with this definition: 'People who could not read or write came to be regarded as rude, ignorant, and "illiterate."' In essence, 'the appellation "illiterate" has pejorative connotations implying serious human failing.' However, as is evident in the literature, context-dependent literacy has changed with the times--manifested in an expanding reconceptualization. Zwaan and Dijkstra's literacy contribution in the Encyclopedia of Education (2003) aptly reiterate this trend of "the role of diverse media and new technologies in broadening conceptions of literacy: multiliteracies, information literacies" (italics in the original). It is this highlighted pejorative connotation, with regard to the implied contrasting illiteracy traceable to the circumscribed definition of traditional literacy, which is causing predictable ripples in some quarters. Inevitably, some have called for a rethinking and, trenchantly, for the outright jettisoning of IL. As indicated, this emerged negative factor is a persistent subject of intense debate.
Langford (2000, 18) aptly sums up the prevailing dichotomous mood of "grappl[ing] with semantics." In this regard, some have expressed misgivings with the IL concept and, thus, called for new definitions (e.g., Foster 1993; Gorman 1998; Marcum 2002). For example, Snavely and Cooper (1997) highlight the resulting debate regarding the "ambiguity" surrounding the IL "fad." Foster (1993, l) also discusses the prevailing "near-missionary zeal" portrayal by IL adherents in the literature. McCrank's (1991) scathing condemnation of IL as a "bogus bandwagon," "hoopla," and outright sloganeering further highlights the critics' perspectives. While acknowledging the prevailing reality of multiliteracies, Marcum (2002) also calls for a rethinking of IL. In acknowledging the definitional controversy surrounding IL Owusu-Ansah (2003) nevertheless calls for accommodation. Is "fluency"--as in "information fluency" and "technological fluency"--a more acceptable word? Some critics of the negative connotation of "literacy" have advanced such a shift (e.g., Mani 2004; Marcum 2002; Rader 2002). Yes, the debate is joined but there is no resolution in sight.
The teaching-learning IL concept entails relatively new functional literacy competencies in the information society era; an age that heralded inevitable Tofflerian change-cum-anxiety. In a technology-driven world of rapid change traditional literacy is deemed inadequate. The need for effective retrieval, evaluation, and use of information is the core of IL. The lifelong learning aspect of IL is indisputable but this ideal, as highlighted, should be based on lifelong ready access to information. Here, the laudable initiatives of the lifelong access movement should be broadened across the general population--from its aged focus--as a necessary support for lifelong learning.
However, the IL concept has not won a ringing endorsement. Some vociferous detractors have taken issue with the delineated negative connotations of "literacy" in IL. Since the literature attests to the shifting definition of literacy, from traditional to multiliteracies, these detractors have duly called for a radical reconceptualization. Some have advanced new definitions, thus reinforcing Foster's (1993, 344) summative contention that "Information literacy is indeed a phrase in quest of a meaning" and, generally, redefinition. Should it be "information fluency" or other reflective terms? Yes, it is established that IL entails effective retrieval, evaluation, and use of information. If that is the case, could we consider more acceptable terms such as information retrieval, evaluation and use (IREU) or selective information retrieval, evaluation and use (SIREU)? In calling for a radical rethinking we should not lose sight of the lingering problem with the literacy-illiteracy dichotomy and its implied negativity.
Association of College and Research Libraries. Information Literacy Competency Standards for Higher Education. Chicago, IL: ALA, 2000.
Atlas, Michel C. "Library Anxiety in the Electronic Era, or Why Won't Anybody Talk to Me Anymore?" Reference & User Services Quarterly 44, no. 4 (Summer 2005): 314-319.
Behrens, Shirley J. "A Conceptual Analysis and Historical Overview of Information Literacy." College & Research Libraries 55, no. 4 (July 1994): 309-322.
Bernnard, Deborah. "Digital Divide." In Teaching Information Literacy Concepts: Activities and Frameworks from the Field, edited by Trudi E. Jacobson & Timothy H. Gatti, 255-257. Pittsburgh, PA: Library Instruction Publications, 2001.
Breivik, Patricia Senn. Student Learning in the Information Age. Phoenix, AZ: American Council on Education & Oryx Press, 1998.
Breivik, Patricia Senn, and E. Gordon Gee. Information Literacy: Revolution in the Library. New York: American Council on Education & Macmillan, 1989.
Brod, Greg. Technostress: The Human Cost of the Computer Revolution. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1984.
Brown, Ann Goebel, Sandra Weingart, Judith R. J. Johnson, and Betty Dance. "Librarians Don't Bite: Assessing Library Orientation for Freshmen." Reference Services Review 32, no. 4 (2004): 394-403.
Bruce, Harry, and Marc Lampson. "Information Professionals as Agents for Information Literacy." Education for Information 20, no. 2 (Jan. 2002): 81-106.
Dictionary of Library and Information Science, compiled by Joan M. Reitz. Westport, Connecticut: Libraries Unlimited, 2004.
Doku, Ishmael. "Technocomplacency: The Spellchecker and Learning." Academic Exchange Quarterly 10, no. 1 (Spring 2006): 139-146.
Encyclopedia of Communication and Information, edited by Jorge Reina Schemant. New York: Gale/Thomson, 2002.
Encyclopedia of Education, edited by James W. Guthrie. 2nd ed. New York: Thomson/Gale, 2003.
Ford, Barbara J. "Information Literacy Goes International." College & Research Libraries News 55, no. 7 (July/August 1994): 423-425.
Foster, Stephen. "Information Literacy: Some Misgivings." American Libraries 24, no. 4 (April 1993): 344-346.
Geck, Caroline. "The Generation Z Connection: Teaching Information Literacy to the Newest Net Generation." Teacher Librarian 33, no. 3 (Feb. 2006): 19-23.
Gold, Helene E. "Engaging the Adult Learner: Creating Effective Library Instruction." Portal: Libraries and the Academy 5, no. 4 (Oct. 2005): 467-481.
Gorman, Audrey. "Toward a New Definition of Literacy." American Libraries 29, no. 11 (Dec. 1998): 38.
Grant, Maria, and Marlowe Berg. "Information Literacy Integration in a Doctoral Program." In Information Literacy Instruction for Educators: Professional Knowledge for an Information Age, edited by Dawn M. Shinew & Scott Walter, 115-128. New York: The Haworth Information Press, 2003.
Gross, Melissa. "The Impact of Low-Level Skills on Information-Seeking Behavior." Reference & User Services Quarterly 45, no. 2 (Winter 2005): 155-162.
Harrod's Librarians' Glossary, compiled by Ray Prytherch. 8th ed. Aldershot, Hants, England: Gower, 1995.
Hinchliffe, Lisa Janicke. "Technology and the Concept of Information Literacy for Pre-Service Teachers." In Information Literacy Instruction for Educators: Professional Knowledge for an Information Age, edited by Dawn M. Shinew & Scott Walter, 7-18. New York: The Haworth Information Press, 2003.
The International Encyclopedia of Education, edited by Torsten Husen & T. Neville Postlethwaite. 2nd ed. [Oxford, England]: Pergamon, 1994.
International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences, edited by David L. Sills. [New York]: Macmillan & Free Press, 1968.
Jacobson, Trudi E., and Timothy H. Gatti, eds. Teaching Information Literacy Concepts: Activities and Frameworks from the Field. Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania: Library Instruction Publications, 2001.
Jiao, Qun G, and Anthony J. Onwuegbuzie. "The Impact of Information Technology on Library Anxiety: The Role of Computer Attitudes." Information Technology and Libraries 23, no. 4 ((Dec. 2004): 138-144.
Kaplan, Nancy. "Literacy Beyond Books." In The World Wide Web and Contemporary Cultural Theory, edited by Andrew Herman & Thomas Swiss, 207-234. New York: Routledge, 2000.
Kuhlthau, Carol Collier. Information Skills for an Information Society: A Review of the Research. Syracuse, NY: ERIC Clearinghouse on Information Resources, 1987. ERIC no: ED 297740. [Reprinted in Information Reports and Bibliographies 19 (1990): 1426.]
Kupersmith, John. "Technostress and the Reference Librarian." Reference Services Review 20, no. 2 (Summer 1992): 7-14,50.
Labelle, Patrick R., and Karen Nicholson. "Student Information Research Skills: Report on a Quebec Study on Information Literacy." Feliciter 51, no. 1 (2005): 47-49.
Langford, Linda. "Critical Literacy: A Building Block Towards the Information Literate School Community." Teacher Librarian 28, no. 5 (June 2001): 18-21.
Lee, Diane. "A Brief History of Information Literacy." http://www.slais.ubc.ca/courses/libr500/01-02-wt2/www/D_Lee/history.htm (accessed July 20, 2006).
Mani, Nandita. "From Information Literacy to Information Fluency." American Libraries 35, no. 2 (February 2004): 30.
Marcum, James W. "Rethinking Information Literacy." Library Quarterly 72, no. 1 (Jan. 2002): 1-26.
Maughan, Patricia Davitt. "Assessing Information Literacy Among Undergraduates: A Discussion of the Literature and the University of California-Berkeley Assessment Experience." College & Research Libraries 62, no. 1 Jan. 2001): 71-85.
McCrank, Lawrence J. "Information Literacy: A Bogus Bandwagon?" Library Journal 116, no. 8 (May 1, 1991): 38-42.
Meade, Sheli, and William E. Dugger, Jr. "Technological Literacy Standards: Practical Answers and Next Steps." The Technology Teacher 65, no. 3 (Nov. 2005): 32-35.
Mellon, Constance. A. "Library Anxiety: A Grounded Theory and its Development." College & Research Libraries 47, no. 2 (March 1986): 160-165.
Monke, Lowell W. "The Overdominance of Computers." Educational Leadership 63, no. 4 (Dec. 2005/Jan. 2006): 20-23.
Owusu-Ansah, Edward K. "Information Literacy and the Academic Library: A Critical Look at a Concept and the Controversies Surrounding It." Journal of Academic Librarianship 29, no. 4 (July 2003): 219-230.
Ploman, Edward W. "Global Learning--A Challenge." In Learning and Development: A Global Perspective, edited by Edward W. Ploman & Alan Thomas, xix-xxvi. [Toronto, Ontario]: Ontario Institute for Studies in Education, 1986.
Rader, Hannelore B. "Information Literacy 1973-2002: A Selected Literature Review." Library Trends 51, no. 2 (Fall 2002): 242-259.
Roth, Lorie. "Educating the Cut-and-Paste Generation." Library Journal 124, no. 18 (Nov. 1, 1999): 42-44.
Shinew, Dawn M., and Scott Walter, eds. Information Literacy Instruction for Educators: Professional Knowledge For an Information Age. New York: The Haworth Information Press, 2003.
Shoham, Snunith, and Diane Mizrachi. "Perspectives On ... Library Anxiety Among Undergraduates: A Study of Israeli B.Ed Students." Journal of Academic Librarianship 27, no. 4 (July 2001): 305 (7p).
Smith, Frank. The Promise and Threat of Microcomputers in Language Education. Victoria, B.C.: Abel Press, 1984.
Snavely, Loanne, and Natasha Cooper. "The Information Literacy Debate." Journal of Academic Librarianship 23, no. 1 (Jan. 1997): 9-14.
Swiss, Thomas, and Andrew Herman. "The World Wide Web as Magic, Metaphor, and Power." In The World Wide Web and Contemporary Cultural Theory, edited by Andrew Herman & Thomas Swiss, 1-4. New York: Routledge, 2000.
Taylor, D. Stephen. "Technology Acceptance: Increasing New Technology Use By Applying the Right Messages." Performance Improvement 43, no. 9 (Oct. 2004): 21-26.
Tenopir, Carol. "Online Information Anxiety." Library Journal 115 (Aug. 1, 1990): 62.
Toffler, Alvin. The Third Wave. New York: Morrow, 1980.
Van Fleet, Connie, and Danny P. Wallace. "Virtual Libraries--Real Threats:
Technostress and Virtual Reference." Reference & User Services Quarterly 42, no. 3 (Spring 2003): 188-191.
Van Scoyoc, Anna M. "Reducing Library Anxiety in First-Year Students: The Impact of Computer-Assisted Instruction and Bibliographic Instruction." Reference & User Services Quarterly 42, no. 4 (Summer 2003): 329-341.
Wagner, Daniel A., and Robert Kozma. New Technologies for Literacy and Adult Education: A Global Perspective. [Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania]: International Literacy Institute, National Center on Adult Literacy, University of Pittsburgh, 2003.
Wagner, Vivian. "Unsettling Oz: Technology Anxieties in the Novels of L. Frank Baum." The Lion and the Unicorn 30, no. 1 (Jan. 2006): 25-53.
Wallace, Danny P., and Connie Van Fleet. "Virtual Libraries--Real Stress: Change at the Reference Desk." Advances in Library Administration and Organization 18 (2001): 144.
Walter, Scott, and Shinew Dawn M. "Information Literacy Instruction for Educators: A Global Perspective on Needs and Opportunities." In Information Literacy Instruction for Educators: Professional Knowledge For an Information Age, edited by Dawn M. Shinew & Scott Walter, 1-5. New York: The Haworth Information Press, 2003.
Ward, Diane, comp. "Related Information Literacy Web Sites." http://www.infolit.org/relared_sites/index.html (accessed July 20, 2006)
Zurkowski, Paul. The Information Environment: Relationships and Priorities. Washington, DC: National Commission on Libraries and Information Science, 1974.
 For information on the lifelong access concept check the following sites:
a) http://ea.webjunction.org/do/Navigation?category=12208 and
b) http://www.lff.org/lifelong/ (accessed January 8, 2007).
 The integration of IL into the curriculum is considered one of the "best practices" attributes of this concept. For details see: American Library Association/Association of College & Research Libraries. Characteristics of Programs of Information Literacy that Illustrate Best Practices: A Guideline, 2004, http://www.ala.org/ala/acrl/acrlstandards/characteristics.htm (accessed July 22, 2006).
Ishmael Doku, Clarion University of Pennsylvania
Doku, Ed.D., is Assistant Professor of Library Science