Printer Friendly
The Free Library
14,680,088 articles and books
Member login
User name  
Password 
 
Join us Forgot password?

Rating TV ratings.


Will the new television broadcast standards be used to censor gay and lesbian characters and content?

For several seasons on network television, we've seen more and better lesbian and gay characters. But will the television ratings Television ratings may refer to:
  • TV Ratings, a rating system used to flag potentially offensive content
  • An audience measurement technique. See:
  • Audience Measurement
 system implemented on January 1 send us back to the prime-time closet? Members of the committee responsible for the ratings say no. Gay groups aren't so sure.

"Even if the system doesn't last, it will have an impact," says Richard Jennings, executive director of Hollywood Supports Hollywood Supports is an organization that fights homophobia and AIDS discrimination in Hollywood. Founded in 1991 by Sid Sheinberg (then CEO of Universal Pictures) and Barry Diller (then head of 20th Century Fox), Hollywood Supports hosts "AIDS in the Workplace" seminars and helps , a clearinghouse for gay issues in the entertainment industry. "Unspoken rules, such as the one that has kept producers from depicting intimacy between two men, are likely to be enshrined by this new system."

But since the ratings began, one lesbian kiss has made it onto the air. In the January 11 episode of ABC's Relativity, actor Lisa Edelstein Lisa Edelstein (born May 21 1966) is an award-winning American actress and playwright. She currently stars as Lisa Cuddy on critically-acclaimed FOX drama, House.  delivered a ten-second kiss to her new girlfriend [see story on page 30]. "It's the most romantic lesbian kiss ever broadcast," says openly lesbian writer Jan Oxenberg, who penned the scene. "The kiss was edited from its original length, but it's still in the episode. That's proof that no ratings system is going to change what we can show."

Oxenberg also believes the ratings may provide even more opportunities for viewers. "I'm hoping that, as in the movies, an adult rating on a program will give us more freedom to depict adult situations," she says. "So this may be a good thing."

Approved by the Federal Communications Commission Federal Communications Commission (FCC), independent executive agency of the U.S. government established in 1934 to regulate interstate and foreign communications in the public interest.  and President Clinton, the ratings are separated into six categories. Shows considered suitable for all children are rated TV-Y TV-Y Specifically Designed for Younger Children (television rating) ; those rated TV-Y7 are deemed appropriate for children over age 7. Other ratings include TV-G TV-G Suitable for All Viewers (television rating)  ("general audiences"); TV-PG ("parental guidance suggested"); TV-14 ("parents strongly cautioned"), the rating Relativity's lesbian-kiss episode received; and TV-M ("for mature audiences only"). The rating appears briefly in the upper left-hand corner of the television screen at the beginning of each program.

The codes are meant to address what some say is the advent of more violence and sexual content in television programs. Gay activists fear that this system will try to distinguish between gay and straight sex in determining what's appropriate viewing for young audiences. "We're taking a wait-and-see position," says Alan Klein, a spokesman for the Gay and Lesbian Alliance Against Defamation, a media watchdog group. "But we are concerned that this system will help conservative groups influence programmers to freeze out gay images from the nation's TV screens."

In fact, according to GLAAD GLAAD Gay & Lesbian Alliance Against Defamation  managing director William Waybourn, before the system was even implemented, Christian-right groups had already issued a model for the ratings in meetings with Jack Valenti, chairman of the Motion Picture Association of America and head of the committee that developed the ratings. "But," Waybourn adds, "Valenti has assured us that this model was not accepted."

Waybourn notes that several obstacles to airing controversial material remain intact. "The final say still goes to local programmers," he says. "An affiliate station can choose not to air a program that has an adult rating."

This sort of selective broadcasting leads to the regionalization regionalization Managed care The subdivision of a broadly available service–eg, a blood bank, into quasi-autonomous regional centers, capable of making decisions and providing more cost-effective and/or faster service to hospitals and health care facilities,  of gay images, says Hilary Rosen, one of two openly gay members of the Television Ratings Implementation Group. "A Midwest broadcaster has a different sensibility about what's appropriate to air than a New York New York, state, United States
New York, Middle Atlantic state of the United States. It is bordered by Vermont, Massachusetts, Connecticut, and the Atlantic Ocean (E), New Jersey and Pennsylvania (S), Lakes Erie and Ontario and the Canadian province of
 broadcaster," she says. And the result, she adds, is "fewer gay images in conservative parts of the country, where they're needed most."

According to an ABC ABC
 in full American Broadcasting Co.

Major U.S. television network. It began when the expanding national radio network NBC split into the separate Red and Blue networks in 1928.
 spokeswoman, no affiliates pulled Relativity's lesbian-kiss episode from its schedule. But that may have less to do with its content than with the show's low ratings for the season--for the week ending January 5, it ranked 84th. Klein notes that if the same kiss occurred on a top-rated show such as Seinfeld, "the networks might be more squeamish squea·mish  
adj.
1.
a. Easily nauseated or sickened.

b. Nauseated.

2. Easily shocked or disgusted.

3. Excessively fastidious or scrupulous.
," simply because the show reaches so many more people. But, he adds, "despite Relativity's low ratings, ABC did market this episode quite heavily. And the lack of negative response to the show is clearly a sign that times are changing."
COPYRIGHT 1997 Liberation Publications, Inc.
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 1997, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:evaluation of television program ratings from a gay perspective
Author:Pela, Robrt L.
Publication:The Advocate (The national gay & lesbian newsmagazine)
Article Type:Column
Date:Feb 18, 1997
Words:676
Previous Article:Television's 23 gay characters. (list of gay characters in popular soap operas and situation comedies)
Next Article:Experts agree: an AIDS vaccine is doable. (issues surrounding the development of the AIDS vaccine)
Topics:



Related Articles
Information rage: rating the TV raters.(Editorial)
Changing channels.(gay-themed TV movies)(Cover Story)
Hollywood's double standard.(motion pictures and television programs have antigay ratings bias)(Brief Article)
Keeping track of TV trends is the latest trend.
NATPE Brings Renewed Hope to Syndication.
Where are the funny girls?
FEW PARENTS RELYING ON TV RATINGS.(NEWS)
Where have all the gays gone? After years of inclusion, gay and lesbian characters are pretty much absent from the new fall TV season. Stephen...
Gay TV networks to conquer the masses.(lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender)
Redes gay de TV a conquistar las masas.

Terms of use | Copyright © 2009 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters | Submit articles