Printer Friendly
The Free Library
14,718,654 articles and books
Member login
User name  
Password 
 
Join us Forgot password?

Randomized Trial Comparing Interferential Therapy With Motorized Lumbar Traction and Massage in the Management of Low Back Pain in a Primary Care Setting.


Werners R, Pynsent PB, Bulstrode CJ (Orthopaedic Primary Care Centre, Dinslaken, Germany; Research and Teaching Centre, Royal Orthopaedic Hospital, Birmingham, England; John Radcliffe Hospital The John Radcliffe Hospital is a large tertiary teaching hospital in Oxford, UK.

It is the main teaching hospital for Oxford University and Oxford Brookes University. As such, it is a well developed centre of medical research.
, Oxford, England), Spine. 1999;24:1579-1584.

This randomized ran·dom·ize  
tr.v. ran·dom·ized, ran·dom·iz·ing, ran·dom·iz·es
To make random in arrangement, especially in order to control the variables in an experiment.
 trial compared and measured the outcomes of interferenrial therapy with motorized mo·tor·ize  
tr.v. mo·tor·ized, mo·tor·iz·ing, mo·tor·iz·es
1. To equip with a motor.

2. To supply with motor-driven vehicles.

3. To provide with automobiles.
 lumbar traction and massage in the management of low back pain in a primary care setting. The study consisted of 148 subjects (age range= 20-60 years) with low back pain. These subjects were randomized into 2 treatment groups: one group was treated with interferential therapy using a standard Galva electrotherapy electrotherapy /elec·tro·ther·a·py/ (-ther´ah-pe) treatment of disease by means of electricity.

e·lec·tro·ther·a·py
n.
Medical therapy using electric currents.
 system, the other group was treated with motorized lumbar traction with massage (a standardized motorized traction system that applies massage via motorized wheels). None of the subjects had previous spinal surgery, any significant medical conditions, or any spinal disorders that appeared on plain radiographs (eg, spondylolysis).

All subjects received six 10-minute treatment sessions over a period of 14 to 21 days except for 3 subjects who only received 4 treatments. Subjects filled out an Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and a visual analog scale (VAS vas (vas) pl. va´ sa  [L.] vessel.va´sal

vas aber´rans 
1. a blind tubule sometimes connected with the epididymis; a vestigial mesonephric tubule.

2.
) that measured pain (0=no pain, 100=unbearable pain)immediately before and after treatment and at a 3-month follow-up.

Ten subjects dropped out of the study (3 in the traction group and 7 in the interferential group) during the intervention, and another 10 subjects were lost during the 3-month follow-up (3 subjects in the traction group and 7 subjects in the interferential group).

Statistical analysis was done using StatView 3 software. The ODI's final score was expressed as a percentage. Two non-parametric methods were used: the Mann-Whitney U test Mann-Whitney U test,
n.pr See test, Mann-Whitney U.
 for unpaired data and the Wilcoxon signed rank test.

The mean ODI score was 30 for both groups. After treatment, this score dropped to 25 for both groups; at the 3-month follow-up, the mean ODI score was 21 for the interferential therapy group and 22 for the motorized lumbar and traction group. The mean VAS scores before treatment were 50 (interferential therapy) and 51 (motorized lumbar traction and massage). These scores dropped to 46 and 44 after therapy and 42 and 39 at follow-up, respectively.

On the ODI scores, a significant difference existed in the median score for the periods between the 3 interview times, but no significant difference existed between the 2 treatment groups at any of the 3 interview times. For the VAS pain scores, significant differences existed before treatment, after treatment (for lumbar traction only), and at 3 months, but no significant differences existed between the groups.

The authors concluded that, in this study, improvement may be explained because of one or more of the following reasons: (1) neither treatment did any good or harm and improvements were due to the natural history of low back pain, (2) some part of the improvement was explained by a placebo effect placebo effect
n.
A beneficial effect in a patient following a particular treatment that arises from the patient's expectations concerning the treatment rather than from the treatment itself.
 that acted similarly in both groups, and (3) some part of the treatment was effective.

Roslyn Sofer sofer
 or sopher

In Judaism, a scholar-teacher of the 5th–2nd centuries BC who transcribed, edited, and interpreted the Bible. The first sofer was Ezra, who, with his disciples, initiated a tradition of rabbinical scholarship that is still central in
, PT, OCS OCS - Object Compatibility Standard  Touro College Bayshore, NY
COPYRIGHT 2000 American Physical Therapy Association, Inc.
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2000, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:Review
Author:Sofer, Roslyn
Publication:Physical Therapy
Article Type:Book Review
Geographic Code:1USA
Date:Apr 1, 2000
Words:491
Previous Article:Responsiveness of Common Outcome Measures for Patients With Low Back Pain.(Review)
Next Article:Prognostic Value of a Treadmill Exercise Score in Symptomatic Patients With Nonspecific ST-T Abnormalities on Resting ECG.(Review)
Topics:



Related Articles
Pain Management in Physical Therapy.
Color Atlas of Low Back Pain.
Therapeutic Modalities in Sports Medicine, 2d ed.
The Lumbar Spine and Back Pain, 4th ed.
The Psychology of Back Pain: A Clinical and Legal Handbook, Publication No. 1091, American Series in Behavioral Science and Law.
Diagnosis and Treatment of the Spine: Nonoperative Orthopedic Medicine and Manual Therapy.
Low Back Pain in Primary Care: Effectiveness of Diagnostic and Therapeutic Interventions.
Pocket Guide to Musculoskeletal Assessment.(Review)
Low Back Pain: A Symptom-Based Approach to Diagnosis and Treatment.(Review)
Orthopaedic Physical Therapy, 3d ed.

Terms of use | Copyright © 2009 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters | Submit articles