Printer Friendly

Radiological case of the month: Hyo-Jeong Lee, MD.


A 68-year-old man with a long history of uncontrolled hypertension presented with a single 4-minute episode of a generalized tonic-clonic seizure, and 2 days of fluctuating headache, visual disturbance, nausea, and vomiting. On neurologic examination, he was drowsy but able to follow simple commands. He had no focal neurologic deficit. The physical examination revealed a blood pressure of 230/75 mm Hg and no pedal edema. The fundoscopic examination was normal.




Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) of the brain were performed with a GE Signa LX 1.5T MRI scanner (GE Healthcare, Waukesha, WI). Contrast media (Magnevist, gadopentetate dimeglumine, Berlex Laboratories, Montville, NJ) was injected intravenously (0.1 mmol/kg body weight). The MRI showed bilateral symmetric vasogenic edema mainly involving the subcortical white matter in the parieto-occipital, posterior temporal, and posterior frontal lobes (Figure 1). The MRA of the vertebrobasilar system was unremarkable without any area of stenosis or vasospasm (Figure 2).


Posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome


Reversible posterior leukoencephalopathy syndrome is a clinicoradiologic entity characterized by headaches, altered mental status, seizures, and visual loss and is associated with white matter vasogenic edema predominantly affecting the posterior occipital and parietal lobes of the brain. (1) There has been some controversy about what the proper term should be for this entity because MRI has shown that lesions can occur in both gray and white matter. Therefore, a new name, posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome (PRES), has been coined. (2) Most cases of PRES occur with hypertension or immunosuppression, but it can occur with many diverse clinical entities. (1,3) Since PRES is often unsuspected by clinicians, recognition of the characteristic imaging findings by radiologists is key to diagnosing this syndrome and should prevent deleterious work-ups or therapies.

The pathophysiology of PRES is under debate, but it is related to disordered cerebral autoregulation. Two pathophysiologic mechanisms have been proposed regarding cerebral autoregulation--cerebral vasospasm, which results in cytotoxic edema, (4) and vasodilatation, which results in vasogenic edema. (5) The latter is more favored by most experimental and clinical data. (6,7) The pathophysiology of PRES also implicates endothelial dysfunction, especially in cases without severe hypertension, such as pre-eclampsia or cytotoxic therapies. (1)

The most characteristic imaging pattern in PRES is the presence of edema involving the white matter of the posterior portions of both cerebral hemispheres, especially the parietooccipital regions, in a relatively symmetric pattern that spares the calcarine and paramedian parts of the occipital lobes. (1) However, other structures (such as the brain stem, cerebellum, and frontal and temporal lobes) may also be involved, and although the abnormality primarily affects the subcortical white matter, the cortex and the basal ganglia may also be involved. (8) Although they are rare, gyriform signal enhancement or parenchymal hemorrhage can occur in complicated cases. (9) Recently, studies with diffusion-weighted sequences (6) and diffusion-tensor sequences (7) have shown increased apparent diffusion coefficients (ADCs) in the involved regions accompanied by anisotropy loss, which suggests reversible vasogenic edema as an underlying pathophysiology. Therefore, early diagnosis and treatment is essential for the patients' prognosis.


Posterior reversible leukoencephalopathy syndrome is a clinicoradiologic entity associated with hypertension, immunosuppression, or many diverse clinical entities. Since PRES is often unsuspected by clinicians, recognition of the characteristic imaging findings by radiologists is key to diagnosing this syndrome and should prevent deleterious work-ups or therapies.


(1.) Hinchey J, Chaves C, Appignani B, et al. A reversible posterior leukoencephalopathy syndrome. N Engl J Med. 1996;334:494-500.

(2.) Casey SO, Sampaio RC, Michel E, et al. Posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome: Utility of fluid-attenuated inversion recovery MR imaging in the detection of cortical and subcortical lesions. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2000;21:1199-1206.

(3.) Port JD, Beauchamp NJ Jr. Reversible intracerebral pathologic entities mediated by vascular autoregulatory dysfunction. Radio-Graphics. 1998;18:353-367.

(4.) Lewis LK, Hinshaw DB Jr, Will AD, et al. CT and angiographic correlation of severe neurological disease in toxemia of pregnancy. Neuroradiology. 1988;30:59-64.

(5.) Strandgaard S, Paulson OB. Cerebral autoregulation. Stroke. 1984;15:413-416.

(6.) Schwartz RB, Mulkern RV, Gudbjartsson H, Jolesz F. Diffusion-weighted MR imaging in hypertensive encephalopathy: Clues to pathogenesis. Am J Neuroradiol. 1998;19:859-862.

(7.) Mukherjee P, McKinstry RC. Reversible posterior leukoencephalopathy syndrome: Evaluation with diffusion-tensor MR imaging. Radiology. 2001;219:756-765.

(8.) Lamy C, Oppenheim C, Meder JF, Mas JL. Neuroimaging in posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome. J Neuroimaging. 2004; 14:89-96.

(9.) Schwartz RB, Jones KM, Kalina P, et al. Hypertensive encephalopathy: Findings on CT, MR imaging and SPECT imaging in 14 cases. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1992;159:379-383.

Hyo-Jeong Lee, MD

Prepared by Hyo-Jeong Lee, MD, St. Vincent's Medical Center, Bridgeport, CT.
COPYRIGHT 2007 Anderson Publishing Ltd.
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2007 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

 Reader Opinion




Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Author:Lee, Hyo-Jeong
Publication:Applied Radiology
Article Type:Case study
Geographic Code:1USA
Date:May 1, 2007
Previous Article:Applications of diffusion tensor imaging and fiber tractography.
Next Article:Radiological case of the month: Rama Anand, MBBS, MD; Mahender K. Narula, MBBS, MD; Rachna Madan, MBBS, MD, DNB; Om Prakash Pathania, MBBS, MS.

Related Articles
Radiological case of the month: Ann Kim, MD and Erini Makariou, MD.
Radiological case of the month: Jared Mills, BS and James G. Ravenel, MD.
Radiological case of the month: Ripal Shah, MD, and Thomas Pope, MD, FACR.
Radiological case of the month: Elizabeth Herf, MD and B. Kirke Bieneman, MD.
Radiological case of the month: Rita Agarwala, MD.
Radiological case of the month: Barton F. Lane, MD and Clint W. Sliker, MD.
Radiological case of the month: Hartley M. Sirkis, MD.
Radiological case of the month: Djamil Fertikh, MD, and Mounir Fertikh, MD.
Radiological case of the month: Garrett L. Walworth, MD, and Joon K. Kim, MD.
Radiological case of the month: Alex Hsu, MD, PhD, Paul Stark, MD, and Paul. Friedman, MD.

Terms of use | Copyright © 2015 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters