Printer Friendly
The Free Library
14,717,777 articles and books
Member login
User name  
Password 
 
Join us Forgot password?

Radioactivity from burning coal.


Worry about the release and accumulation of radioactive materials in the environment has led to much hand wringing over the risks of accidents at nuclear power plants and weapons facilities.

But what about radioactivity released from burning coal?

W. Alex Gabbard, a nuclear physicist Nu´cle`ar phys´i`cist

n. 1. A scientist specializing in nuclear physics.

Noun 1. nuclear physicist - a physicist who specializes in nuclear physics
physicist - a scientist trained in physics
 at the Oak Ridge Oak Ridge, city (1990 pop. 27,310), Anderson and Roane counties, E Tenn., on Black Oak Ridge and the Clinch River; founded by the U.S. government 1942, inc. as an independent city 1959.  (Tenn.) National Laboratory, did a little calculating. According to Environmental Protection Agency Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), independent agency of the U.S. government, with headquarters in Washington, D.C. It was established in 1970 to reduce and control air and water pollution, noise pollution, and radiation and to ensure the safe handling and  figures, an average ton of coal contains 1.3 parts per million parts per million

mg/kg or ml/l; see ppm.
 of uranium and 3.2 parts per million of thorium thorium (thôr`ēəm) [from Thor], radioactive chemical element; symbol Th; at. no. 90; at. wt. 232.0381; m.p. about 1,750°C;; b.p. about 4,790°C;; sp. gr. 11.7 at 20°C;; valence +4. . Both naturally occurring trace metals are radioactive. Of the uranium, roughly 0.71 percent is U-235, the fissionable fis·sion·a·ble  
adj.
Capable of undergoing fission: fissionable nuclear material.



fis
 variety used by nuclear power plants.

Thus in 1982, he estimates, U.S. coal-burning power plants, which collectively consumed 616 million tons of coal, released 801 tons of uranium and 1,971 tons of thorium into the environment -- virtually unnoticed.

Roughly 11,371 pounds of the uranium was U-235.

Moreover, global combustion of 2,800 million tons of coal that year released 8,960 tons of thorium and 3,640 tons of uranium, of which 51,700 pounds was U-235.

Ironically, in 1982, 111 U.S. nuclear power plants used 540 tons of nuclear fuel to generate electricity. Thus, "the release of nuclear components from coal combustion far exceeds the entire U.S. consumption of nuclear fuels," Gabbard notes in the fall issue of the OAK RIDGE NATIONAL LABORATORY Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) is a multiprogram science and technology national laboratory managed for the United States Department of Energy by UT-Battelle, LLC. ORNL is located in Oak Ridge, Tennessee, near Knoxville.  REVIEW.

Gabbard then calculated the energy value of the lost radioactive materials. He found that the nuclear fuel released by burning coal has one and a half times more energy than the coal itself.

Because electric utilities are not perceived to be as hazardous as nuclear power plants, "large quantities of uranium and thorium and other radioactive species in coal ash are not being treated as radioactive waste," Gabbard says.

"These products emit low-level radiation. But because of regulatory differences, coal-fired power plants are allowed to release quantities of radioactive material that would provoke enormous public outcry if such amounts were released from nuclear facilities," he adds.

"Nuclear waste products from coal combustion are allowed to be dispersed throughout the biosphere biosphere, irregularly shaped envelope of the earth's air, water, and land encompassing the heights and depths at which living things exist. The biosphere is a closed and self-regulating system (see ecology), sustained by grand-scale cycles of energy and of  in an unregulated manner," Gabbard concludes. Such wastes accumulate on electric utility sites and are "not protected from weathering, thus exposing people to increasing quantities of radioactive isotopes through air and water movement and the food chain."
COPYRIGHT 1994 Science Service, Inc.
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 1994, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.
duncan10
Duncan MacKellar (Member): Actually these conclusions are lies, its really worse 6/7/2009 2:58 AM
Atomic power plants do not give off any radiation at all. They do make radioactive waste that is contained and safely reprocessed and never reaches the environment. Coal burning actually puts more radiation into the environment than if atomic power plants just dumped the waste on the ground or in a river, or burned it in a pit. Coal burning is hugely radiation producing, atomic power plants put no radiation into the environment.<br>Duncan-

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Publication:Science News
Article Type:Brief Article
Date:Oct 1, 1994
Words:387
Previous Article:Toasted asteroids. (asteroid collisions with the sun) (Brief Article)
Next Article:Computers enhance solar efficiency. (solar water-heating system using microprocessors) (Brief Article)
Topics:



Related Articles
Rolling with coal. (possibility that railroads will return to domestic coal as fuel, includes related article on romance of railroads)
Good king coal. (new form of coal that is high in hydrogen and low in sulfur, metal and ash) (Editorial)
Coal use levels off. (global coal consumption)
China: A mercury megapolluter.(Brief Article)
Global Initiative to Generate Clean Coal Power.(Brief Article)
The fires below: burning coal sculpts landscapes worldwide.(underground fires in coal seams)
Naturally occuring radiation: an emerging occupational health issue.(Technology)
Coal facts.(Matters Of Scale)
Energizing wood power: replacing fossil fuels in a "clean energy" economy.(Currents)
Blackening the skies: the Bush administration pushes dirty coal plants.(Currents)

Terms of use | Copyright © 2009 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters | Submit articles