RX\Good Rx ... or bitter pill?Byline: Fran Kritz Medical Tribune News Service Many prescription drugs approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for one illness also are useful against other diseases. But FDA FDA abbr. Food and Drug Administration FDA, n.pr See Food and Drug Administration. FDA, n.pr the abbreviation for the Food and Drug Administration. rules prohibit drug companies from widespread promotion of these so-called "off-label" uses, which critics say prevents vital treatment information from reaching doctors and their patients. In response, two U.S. senators have introduced a bill that would allow companies to promote off-label uses of their products by providing doctors with journal articles that recommend such uses. "This legislation will greatly increase one's odds of getting state-of-the-art treatment that could cure a disease, slow the progression of a disease or at a minimum, improve one's quality of life," said Sen. Connie Mack Connie Mack can refer to three different people:
Under current regulations, the FDA approves a drug or device for specific conditions or diseases. Once a single approval has been granted, doctors may prescribe the product for other, unapproved un·ap·proved adj. Not approved or sanctioned: an unapproved vaccine; an unapproved protest march. uses. An estimated 40 percent of all drugs are used for off-label indications, and 70 percent of cancer drugs are used that way, according to according to prep. 1. As stated or indicated by; on the authority of: according to historians. 2. In keeping with: according to instructions. 3. Mack. Currently, companies can respond to doctors' queries about off-label uses, but cannot send out information unless a request is made. "It is true that ... information could be provided in response to a specific physician's inquiry, but it is impractical to imagine that every doctor would make such a request," said Dr. Bruce Chabner, clinical director of the cancer center at Massachusetts General Hospital Massachusetts General Hospital Health care The major teaching hospital for Harvard Medical School, widely regarded as one of the best health care centers in the world in Boston. The proposed legislation would allow drug companies to send out unabridged articles from major medical publications, such as the New England Journal of Medicine The New England Journal of Medicine (New Engl J Med or NEJM) is an English-language peer-reviewed medical journal published by the Massachusetts Medical Society. It is one of the most popular and widely-read peer-reviewed general medical journals in the world. and the Journal of the American Medical Association JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association is an international peer-reviewed general medical journal, published 48 times per year by the American Medical Association. JAMA is the most widely circulated medical journal in the world. , that report on unapproved uses of a drug or device. Companies also could send out textbooks and conference summaries on unapproved uses of a product. The legislation has the support of medical groups such as the American Heart Association American Heart Association (AHA), n.pr a national voluntary health agency that has the goal of increasing public and medical awareness of cardiovascular diseases and stroke, and thereby reducing the number of associated deaths and disabilities. and the American Medical Association American Medical Association (AMA), professional physicians' organization (founded 1847). Its goals are to protect the interests of American physicians, advance public health, and support the growth of medical science. . But some witnesses told the Senate's Labor and Human Resources Committee on Thursday that the bill could allow the dissemination of information that eventually proves incorrect. William B. Schultz, deputy FDA commissioner for policy, told the Senate committee that two drugs approved to correct abnormal heart rhythms, encainide and flecainide, subsequently were used off-label for irregular heart rhythms during a heart attack - a use that was supported by several journal articles. But when the National Institutes of Health studied this off-label use, it found that the death rate among heart-attack patients given the drugs was twice that of those given a placebo. "If this unapproved use had been heavily promoted by drug companies, it is estimated that thousands more unnecessary deaths would have occurred," Schultz said. Acknowledging that drug companies are reluctant to spend the time and money necessary to get off-label uses of their products approved by the FDA, Schultz said his agency will try to move applications for these types of approvals through the system more quickly. |
|
||||||||||||||

Printer friendly
Cite/link
Email
Feedback
Reader Opinion