RUNOFF WORRIES RISING; RIVERBEDS NOT CLEARED; PERMITS WILL BE ISSUED.Byline: Patricia Farrell Aidem Daily News Staff Writer Cloudy skies proved a reminder Monday that the storm season is looming, yet weeks have passed since Los Angeles Los Angeles (lôs ăn`jələs, lŏs, ăn`jəlēz'), city (1990 pop. 3,485,398), seat of Los Angeles co., S Calif.; inc. 1850. County officials declared a crisis in local riverbeds where jungle-like growth threatens to block the flow of storm runoff. And while the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers has promised to issue permits Monday to clear the waterways, Los Angeles County officials are concerned that the permits might involve conditions too stringent to meet. Both sides will meet today before the county Board of Supervisors The examples and perspective in this article or section may represent an unduly geographically limited view of the subject. Please [ improve this article] or discuss the issue on the talk page. The Board of Supervisors is the body governing counties in the U.S. over issues that have become so heated that Supervisor Michael D. Antonovich Michael Dennis Antonovich (born 1939 in Los Angeles, California) is a member of the Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors representing the Fifth District, which covers northern Los Angeles County, the Antelope, Santa Clarita, Pasadena, and parts of the San Fernando and San has recommended suing the state and federal governments if they try to block the county from clearing the region's rivers before the rainy season. ``It's one thing to get a permit, but another thing to get so many conditions attached that the permit isn't viable,'' Antonovich aide Dave Vannatta said Monday. ``Mike's intent is that if we don't get the permits we need, the supervisor is saying we should sue.'' Proceeding under the threat of a lawsuit might be the only way to remove brush and wetlands from riverbeds before the predicted El Nino rainstorms begin, said James A. Noyes, chief deputy director of the county Department of Public Works public works pl.n. Construction projects, such as highways or dams, financed by public funds and constructed by a government for the benefit or use of the general public. Noun 1. . ``My concern is that we have a serious problem out here,'' Noyes said. ``My engineer tells me that some of these areas could cause a serious hazard. Ultimately, how it is to be handled is for the board to decide, and if it takes having to sue someone that's what we might have to do.'' At issue in the Santa Clarita Valley The Santa Clarita Valley is the valley of the Santa Clara River in Southern California. It stretches through Los Angeles County and Ventura County. Its main population center is the city of Santa Clarita. The valley was part of the 48,612-acre (19,672. is the vegetation growing in the Santa Clara River Santa Clara River may refer to:
County and Santa Clarita city officials worry that the plant life could block water flow in the event of heavy rain, and flood surrounding development. Federal officials agree the waterways should be cleared but insist that the county establish new streamside stream·side n. The land adjacent to a stream. habitats to replace those it destroys. Also, the Army Corps could prohibit the use of bulldozers in sensitive habitats. ``We are suggesting that some areas be hand-cleared to save that riparian riparian adj. referring to the banks of a river or stream. (See: riparian rights) habitat,'' said Fred-Otto Egeler, chief of public affairs for the corps. ``But there are some places where you need to bulldoze bull·doze v. bull·dozed, bull·doz·ing, bull·dozes v.tr. 1. To clear, dig up, or move with a bulldozer. 2. To treat in an abusive manner; bully. 3. , where water can't spread in normal spreading grounds because of development.'' Last week a contingent of environmental groups including Friends of the Santa Clara River called on the county to maintain the plant life natural to the river and remove just the non-native species. That, Noyes said, would be impossible in some areas of the river because development lies too close to the banks. ``This whole thing goes back some 30 years ago when it was public policy to build flood control facilities to allow maximum land development,'' Noyes said. ``That meant making natural rivers into concrete channels. That's not the thinking in the '90s, but we're stuck with that system. We have to work with what we've got. We have levies and bridges that make it hazardous to allow any vegetation to remain.'' |
|
||||||||||||

Printer friendly
Cite/link
Email
Feedback
Reader Opinion