ROCKWELL SCRAPS PLANS FOR SMALL-LAUNCH SPACECRAFT.Byline: Daily News Rockwell has announced plans to withdraw from a joint venture with Orbital Sciences Corp. (OSC O.S.C. n. short for Order to Show Cause. (See: Order to Show Cause) ) to develop a small, three-stage spacecraft called the X-34. The X-34 was envisioned as a commercially operated, small-launch vehicle to reduce dramatically the cost of putting lightweight satellites into orbit, and to conduct early technology tests for the National Aeronautics aeronautics: see aerodynamics; airplane; aviation. and Space Administration's reusable-launch vehicle program. Both Rockwell and OSC were to have invested $50 million each, with NASA's share of the program fixed at $70 million. The craft they planned was to consist of a rocket-powered winged booster Booster - A data-parallel language. "The Booster Language", E. Paalvast, TR PL 89-ITI-B-18, Inst voor Toegepaste Informatica TNO, Delft, 1989. that would be carried aloft under a jumbo jet, and would itself contain a smaller rocket that would place the payload (1) Refers to the "actual data" in a packet or file minus all headers attached for transport and minus all descriptive meta-data. In a network packet, headers are appended to the payload for transport and then discarded at their destination. into orbit. Friday's announcement came after a series of program reviews prompted by OSC's decision Jan. 22 to advise NASA NASA: see National Aeronautics and Space Administration. NASA in full National Aeronautics and Space Administration Independent U.S. that the program, as currently structured, was no longer viable, a Rockwell statement said. On Jan. 24, OSC issued stop-work orders to all its X-34 subcontractors, including Rockwell. Rockwell then joined OSC in a review to determine whether a smaller, less-powerful launch vehicle could meet NASA's technology demonstration requirements while also addressing a viable component of the anticipated launch market. That review indicated that a smaller vehicle would not be commercially successful. John A. McLuckey, Rockwell's president and chief operating officer Chief Operating Officer (COO) The officer of a firm responsible for day-to-day management, usually the president or an executive vice-president. for Aerospace and Defense, expressed disappointment that the industry team could not move forward with the program. "There is an absolute requirement for this nation to develop a low-cost means of delivering payloads to orbit," he said in a statement released by his company. "The X-34 program had great potential to demonstrate critical technologies for NASA while being commercially profitable for the industry partnership." In February 1995, Rockwell and OSC formed American Space Lines as part of a proposed joint venture to develop and operate the X-34 launch vehicle. For the past year, a team of Rockwell engineers has been working at OSC's Virginia headquarters near Dulles International Airport. The two proposed prototype spacecraft were to have been built by a work force of 40 to 50 people and were to be tested at Edwards Air Force Base Edwards Air Force Base, U.S. military installation, 301,000 acres (121,805 hectares), S Calif., NE of Lancaster; est. 1933. It is one of the largest air force bases in the United States and has the world's longest runway. beginning in late 1997. McLuckey said Rockwell remains committed to NASA's "reusable launch vehicle." He said the firm will continue to make substantial investments in the X-33 program, which has been proposed as a spacecraft that could take off and land like an airplane, and would replace the space shuttle space shuttle, reusable U.S. space vehicle. Developed by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA), it consists of a winged orbiter, two solid-rocket boosters, and an external tank. . |
|
||||||||||||||||

Printer friendly
Cite/link
Email
Feedback
Reader Opinion