Printer Friendly
The Free Library
14,734,913 articles and books
Member login
User name  
Password 
 
Join us Forgot password?

Purkey v. CCA Detention Center.


U.S. District Court

RETALIATION

Purkey v. CCA (1) (Common Cryptographic Architecture) Cryptography software from IBM for MVS and DOS applications.

(2) (Compatible Communications A
 Detention Center A detention center or a detention centre is any location used for detention. Specifically, it can mean:
  • A prison
  • A structure for immigration detention
  • An internment camp or concentration camp
, 339 F.Supp.2d 1145 (D.Kan. 2004). A federal prisoner brought a Bivens action against private prison employees. The district court denied the defendants' motion to dismiss. The district court held that employees at a private company under contract to house federal pretrial pre·tri·al  
n.
A proceeding held before an official trial, especially to clarify points of law and facts.

adj.
1. Of or relating to a pretrial.

2.
 detainees were "federal actors" for the purposes of potential Bivens liability, since the detainees were in the custody of the United States United States, officially United States of America, republic (2005 est. pop. 295,734,000), 3,539,227 sq mi (9,166,598 sq km), North America. The United States is the world's third largest country in population and the fourth largest country in area.  Marshal and held under the authority of the United States pending disposition of federal charges against them. According to the court, the prisoner sufficiently stated that he was prejudiced by the employee's destruction of his legal papers, for the purpose of his claim under Bivens that he was denied access to court. The court also found that the prisoner stated a claim for violation of his free speech and association rights. The court noted that prisoners incarcerated incarcerated /in·car·cer·at·ed/ (in-kahr´ser-at?ed) imprisoned; constricted; subjected to incarceration.

in·car·cer·at·ed
adj.
Confined or trapped, as a hernia.
 at prisons under contract to the federal government enjoyed the same constitutional protections as those inmates incarcerated at prisons that are actually run by the federal government. The court held that the prisoner was prejudiced by the employee's destruction of his legal papers because the papers contained written recollections of police interrogations shortly after they were conducted and also recounted representations that were made to him to elicit his cooperation in return for a lighter sentence. The court found that the prisoner stated a Bivens claim by alleging that employees disciplined him because he assisted other inmates in the preparation of grievances against the prisoner. According to the prisoner, the prison did not provide a law library and an attorney employed by the prison to answer legal research requests refused requests for assistance in preparing legal actions against the prison and its personnel. The prisoner alleged that employees harassed and threatened him, placed him in segregation, entered his cell and scattered his papers and belongings, denied him visits with his wife, and confiscated con·fis·cate  
tr.v. con·fis·cat·ed, con·fis·cat·ing, con·fis·cates
1. To seize (private property) for the public treasury.

2. To seize by or as if by authority. See Synonyms at appropriate.

adj.
 his legal materials because he filed grievances. (Corrections Corporation of America Corrections Corporation of America (NYSE: CXW) (CCA) is a company that manages public prisons and other facilities[1], and has concessions for many others. The company had annual revenues in 2004 of $1.15 billion USD. , Leavenworth, Kansas)
COPYRIGHT 2005 CRS, Inc.
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2005, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:GRIEVANCE PROCEDURES, PRISONER
Publication:Corrections Caselaw Quarterly
Geographic Code:1U4KS
Date:Feb 1, 2005
Words:339
Previous Article:Sash v. Zenk.(GOOD TIME)(Brief Article)
Next Article:Hughes v. Slade.(HABEAS CORPUS)(Brief Article)
Topics:



Related Articles
Tellier v. Fields.(violation of prisoners' rights)(Brief Article)
Ferrington v. Louisiana Dept. of Corrections.(exhaustion of state remedies)(Brief Article)
Purkey v. CCA Detention Center.(FREE SPEECH, EXPRESSION, ASSOC.)
Purkey v. CCA Detention Center.(LIABILITY)
Purkey v. CCA Detention Center.(PRETRIAL DETENTION)
Davis v. Milwaukee County.(equal protection)
Medical care.(Hallett v. Morgan)(Gibson v. County of Washoe)(Fenner v. Suthers)(Evans v. Bonner)
Mental problems (Prisoner).(Pelletier v. Magnusson)(Hallett v. Morgan)(Bozeman v. Orum)
Searches.(Dye v. Lomen)(Farid v. Goord)(Saulsberry v. Arpaio)
Nwaokocha v. Sadowski.(Nwaokocha v. Sadowski, 369 F.Supp.2d 362)(Brief Article)

Terms of use | Copyright © 2009 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters | Submit articles