Printer Friendly
The Free Library
14,717,777 articles and books
Member login
User name  
Password 
 
Join us Forgot password?

Public thinks journalists cover up their mistakes.


Byline: The Register-Guard

For what it's it's  

1. Contraction of it is.

2. Contraction of it has. See Usage Note at its.


it's it is or it has
it's be ~have
 worth - which for many may not extend beyond confirming already ingrained in·grained  
adj.
1. Firmly established; deep-seated: ingrained prejudice; the ingrained habits of a lifetime.

2.
 beliefs - the latest survey comparing the perceptions of journalists with those of the public they seek to inform reveals some glaring glar·ing  
adj.
1. Shining intensely and blindingly: the glaring noonday sun.

2. Tastelessly showy or bright; garish.

3.
 disconnects.

Journalists believe they're they're  

Contraction of they are.

they're be
 doing a good job of acknowledging and correcting mistakes; the American American, river, 30 mi (48 km) long, rising in N central Calif. in the Sierra Nevada and flowing SW into the Sacramento River at Sacramento. The discovery of gold at Sutter's Mill (see Sutter, John Augustus) along the river in 1848 led to the California gold rush of  public sharply disagrees. Far fewer members of the news media than the general public characterize their political views as conservative. Even among those identifying themselves as conservatives, journalists and the public were far apart on whether the government ever has a right to limit the reporting of a story.

As it was and ever shall be? In some respects. Results of this latest survey, done for the Annenberg Annenberg may refer to:
  • Moses Annenberg
  • Walter Annenberg
  • Leonore Annenberg, former United States Chief of Protocol and current head of the Annenberg Foundation
  • The Annenberg Foundation
 Public Policy Center, aren't likely to pass without comment from conservatives who charge that news reports reflect a liberal bias.

Journalists characterize their political views as mostly moderate (49 percent) or liberal (31 percent) with only 9 percent describing themselves as conservative. The public self-identified as 38 percent conservative, 33 percent moderate and 24 percent liberal.

Interestingly, while 80 percent of journalists believe it's a bad thing for a news organization to have a clearly identifiable political point of view, nearly half of non-journalists polled said they believed partisan Partisan may refer to: Political matters
In politics, partisan literally means organized into political parties. The expression "Partisan politics" usually refers to fervent, sometimes militant support of a party, cause, faction, person, or idea.
 journalism was a good thing.

It would be risky for journalists to react with a same-old/same-old shrug to some of these findings, particularly the ones having to do with the public's perception of how journalists handle mistakes.

About half the public believe news reports are "often inaccurate," and 65 percent said news organizations deliberately try to cover up or ignore their errors.

Journalists, who can't seem to comprehend such public skepticism skepticism (skĕp`tĭsĭzəm) [Gr.,=to reflect], philosophic position holding that the possibility of knowledge is limited either because of the limitations of the mind or because of the inaccessibility of its object.  - only 11 percent thought news organizations were "often inaccurate" - overwhelmingly believe (74 percent) that they quickly report all errors.

This is a dangerous blind spot. The news media are making a serious error in judgment if they think their existing efforts to correct mistakes have enhanced their credibility with much of the public.

The all-too-frequent factual flubs, mangled names and misidentifications in photo captions apparently make a more lasting impression than the corrections tucked away somewhere inside a newspaper. While timely corrections are important, reducing the overall error rate appears to be the only strategy that can ultimately reverse the decline in public confidence.
COPYRIGHT 2005 The Register Guard
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2005, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:Editorials
Publication:The Register-Guard (Eugene, OR)
Article Type:Editorial
Date:Jun 3, 2005
Words:386
Previous Article:Broad plans for Broadway.(Real Estate & Housing)(National and local developers hatch visions for a mix of housing and shops)
Next Article:LETTERS IN THE EDITOR'S MAILBAG.(Letters)(Letter to the Editor)



Related Articles
Sign of the times. (signing of editorials)(Editorial)
Looking for arrivals from the road less traveled.(journalists)
Public journalism: is it on editorial turf?
Attacks make 'I'm sorry' a little easier.(Columns)(Column)
Learning with legwork. (Editor's Note).(Brief Article)(Editorial)
View your mistakes, even innovative ones, with caution: theory of embracing mistakes may not fit the editorial page. (Symposium: The Creative...
End the Blair witch hunt. (Publisher's Page).(Jayson Blair)(Editorial)
Censorship, or legitimate church discipline, at Baylor University?(Pro Con)
Standing apart from the crowd: how the 2006 Minority Writers Seminar helped an opinionated person fine-tune her writing style.

Terms of use | Copyright © 2009 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters | Submit articles