Proposed regulations eliminate deemed distributions on technical termination of partnerships.Background Sec. 708(b)(1)(B) provides that if within a 12-month period there is a sale or exchange of 50% or more of the total interest in partnership capital or profits, a partnership shall be considered terminated ter·mi·nate v. ter·mi·nat·ed, ter·mi·nat·ing, ter·mi·nates v.tr. 1. To bring to an end or halt: . However, the Code and legislative history do not specify the tax consequences or steps by which the termination The point where a line, channel or circuit ends. See SCSI termination and hybrid. occurs. Regs. Sec. 1.7081(b)(1)(iv) has interpreted Translated from source code into machine code one line at a time. See interpreted language and interpreter. interpreted - interpreter Sec. 708(b)(1)(B) to provide that on termination the partnership distributes its assets and liabilities to the purchaser and the other continuing partners in proportion to their respective partnership interests, and the purchaser and other continuing partners contribute these assets and liabilities to a new partnership. This deemed distribution could result in taxable gain Taxable Gain The portion of a sale that is liable to taxation. Notes: When redistributing mutual fund shares that have increased in value, returns may be subject to taxation. See also: Capital gain, Income Tax to a continuing partner (under Sec. 731(a)) and may affect the basis of the partnership property in the hands of the new partnership (under Sec. 732(b)). Also, the holding period of the partners, interests in the partnership may be affected. Deemed Distribution The deemed distribution raises concerns as to its interaction with other partnership provisions, specifically Secs. 704(c) and 737. Sec. 704(c) provides that, if property is contributed by a partner and distributed to another partner within a five-year period, the contributing partner must recognize gain or loss in an amount equal to the gain or loss the partner would have been allocated on a sale of the property by the partnership. Sec. 737 provides that property distributed to a partner who contributed other property to the partnership within five years must recognize gain equal to the lesser of the partners net precontribution gain or the excess of the value of die distributed property over the adjusted basis of the partners interest. The legislative history of Secs. 704(c) and 737 indicates that these sections are to be coordinated with the Sec. 708(b)(1)(B) termination provisions. The deemed distribution regulations under Sec. 708(b)(1)(B), as noted, indicate that the deemed distributions are made pro rata [Latin, Proportionately.] A phrase that describes a division made according to a certain rate, percentage, or share. In a Bankruptcy case, when the debtor is insolvent, creditors generally agree to accept a pro rata share of what is owed to them. . The pro rata deemed distribution under these regulations appears to conflict with Secs. 704(c) and 737, which contemplate that Partnership property previously contributed will be distributed to that partner - at least to the extent of any remaining built-in built-in - (Or "primitive") A built-in function or operator is one provided by the lowest level of a language implementation. This usually means it is not possible (or efficient) to express it in the language itself. gain or loss. Simplification sim·pli·fy tr.v. sim·pli·fied, sim·pli·fy·ing, sim·pli·fies To make simple or simpler, as: a. To reduce in complexity or extent. b. To reduce to fundamental parts. c. of Sec. 708 Rules Eliminating Deemed Distribution Conflict On May 9, 1996, the IRS An abbreviation for the Internal Revenue Service, a federal agency charged with the responsibility of administering and enforcing internal revenue laws. issued proposed regulations to revise Regs. Sec. 1.708-1(b)(1)(iv) and to propose other conforming con·form v. con·formed, con·form·ing, con·forms v.intr. 1. To correspond in form or character; be similar. 2. revisions ReVisions is a 2004 anthology of alternate history short-stories. It is edited by Julie E. Czerneda and Isaac Szpindel. Contents Title Author The Resonance of Light James Alan Gardner Out of China Julie E. to other regulation sections to reflect the proposed changes to revised Regs. Sec. 1.7081(b)(1)(iv). Under the proposed regulations, a termination under Sec. 708(b)(1)(B) would no longer result in a deemed distribution, thus eliminating the Federal tax consequences previously discussed. If a partnership is terminated under the revised regulations, the partnership is deemed to transfer all of its assets and liabilities to a new partnership in exchange for an interest in the new partnership. Immediately thereafter, the terminated partnership distributes the interests in the new partnership to the purchasing and other remaining partners in liquidation The collection of assets belonging to a debtor to be applied to the discharge of his or her outstanding debts. A type of proceeding pursuant to federal Bankruptcy of the terminated partnership. Thus, the terminated partnerships assets and liabilities are never deemed to be distributed to the individual partners. Without a pro rata deemed distribution, the conflict between the regulations under Sec. 708(b)(1)(B) and the provisions of Secs. 704(c) and 737 has been eliminated. It is important to note that the proposed regulations are clear that they do not change the Federal tax consequences of a termination except for the deemed distribution provisions. For example, the tax year of the terminated partnership will still close, the elections of the terminated partnership will be invalivated, a termination win continue to be treated as a liquidation under Sec. 704(b) and the property deemed contributed to the new partnership will be subject to the anti-churning provisions of Sec. 168(f)(5). The proposed regulations are effective for terminations occurring on or after the date final regulations are published. |
|
||||||||||||||||

Printer friendly
Cite/link
Email
Feedback
Reader Opinion