Primates and Philosophers: How Morality Evolved.PRIMATES AND PHILOSOPHERS: How Morality Evolved FRANS DE WAAL
People tend to think that moral behavior is strictly a veneer veneer (vənēr`), thin leaf of wood applied with glue to a panel or frame of solid wood. The art of veneer developed with early civilization. hiding the base, animalistic an·i·mal·ism n. 1. Enjoyment of vigorous health and physical drives. 2. Indifference to all but the physical appetites. 3. The doctrine that humans are merely animals with no spiritual nature. nature of human beings. De Waal, a researcher of primate behavior and long-time writer, argues that this assessment fails to recognize that morality is actually a gift from animal ancestors and that people are good not by choice but by nature. De Waal presents several examples of sympathetic and empathetic em·pa·thet·ic adj. Empathic. em pa·thet i·cal·ly adv. behavior among nonhuman primates nonhuman primatesee primate. , including protection of others against aggression and consoling behaviors. The author also outlines the stance of scientists and philosophers who avoid attributing such human qualities to animals. He argues that these critics fail to recognize that while animals are not human, humans are animals. The book includes several scientists' comments on de Waal's definition of morality and on the differences--or lack thereof--he cites between people and other animals. Princeton, 2006, 209 p., b&w images, hardcover, $22.95. |
|
||||||||||||||

pa·thet
i·cal·ly adv.
Printer friendly
Cite/link
Email
Feedback
Reader Opinion