Pressing researchers for R&D priorities.Pressing researchers for R&D priorities Addressing the National Academy of Sciences at its annual meeting on April 26, Academy President Frank Press proposed what few leaders of science have ever willingly offered: criteria for setting federal research funding Research funding is a term generally covering any funding for scientific research, in the areas of both "hard" science and technology and social science. The term often connotes funding obtained through a competitive process, in which potential research projects are evaluated and priorities. He described them as "politically realistic and responsive to congressional requests for advice." U.S. scientists are submitting record numbers of research proposals to federal funding agencies. Though generally "superb in quality," Press said, they are also "unprecedented in overall cost. And . . . come at a time of record budget deficits." Moreover, while choices must be made between them, Press said "our political leadership has no way of gauging the amount of resources necessary to maintain the strength of American American, river, 30 mi (48 km) long, rising in N central Calif. in the Sierra Nevada and flowing SW into the Sacramento River at Sacramento. The discovery of gold at Sutter's Mill (see Sutter, John Augustus) along the river in 1848 led to the California gold rush of science and technology." While scientists do have the ability to set priorities for R&D funding, he maintains that "sniping and carping carp·ing adj. Naggingly critical or complaining. carp ing·ly adv.Noun 1. among scientists" over what to fund threatens to undermine the credibility of those who could offer constructive advice. So he recommends the scientific community -- and especially the Academy -- "be willing, for the first time, to propose [budget] priorities across scientific fields," organized into the following three broad categories: * programs that have the highest priority and should be funded now, even when money is tight. Examples he gave were programs responding to national crises, such as AIDS; work on "extraordinary scientific breakthroughts," such as high-temperature superconductivity Unsolved problems in physics: What is the responsible mechanism that causes certain materials to exhibit superconductivity at temperatures much higher than around 50 kelvin? High-temperature superconductors (abbreviated high ; and grants to preserve the human-resource base through training and the funding of individuals and small groups. * large projects with important national or scientific goals that should be authorized au·thor·ize tr.v. au·thor·ized, au·thor·iz·ing, au·thor·iz·es 1. To grant authority or power to. 2. To give permission for; sanction: now, even if full funding for these won't won't Contraction of will not. won't will not won't will be available immediately. Cited examples included the Superconducting Super Collider The Superconducting Super Collider (SSC) was a ring particle accelerator which was planned to be built in the area around Waxahachie, Texas. and human-genome project. * political "prerogatives" that support decisions made by the administration and Congress, including the Defense Department's national security initiatives, the space station and programs to enhance the competitiveness of U.S. R&D. |
|
||||||||||||||

ing·ly adv.
Printer friendly
Cite/link
Email
Feedback
Reader Opinion