Power plant law will tighten up scrutiny of building plans.Governor George E. Pataki announced that he has submitted new Article X legislation that will improve the review and siting process for electric generating facilities in the State and reauthorize a state-wide energy planning Energy planning has a number of different meanings. However, one common meaning of the term is the process of developing long-range policies to help guide the future of a local, national, regional or even the global energy system. process to ensure an adequate, reliable and affordable supply of energy to meet New York's growing energy needs. "This comprehensive legislation refines and improves the expired Article X law to ensure that proposed plants undergo a thorough review, with extensive public input, in a timely manner," said Pataki. The legislation was drafted with input from the energy industry and environmental organizations, and presents a comprehensive solution to concerns raised by both the Senate and Assembly. The bill provides a new review procedure for non-major power plants and re-powering projects with a net generating output of 50-80 megawatts (MW), including ample opportunities for public comment, intervenor An individual who is not already a party to an existing lawsuit but who makes himself or herself a party either by joining with the plaintiff or uniting with the defendant in resistance of the plain-tiff's claims. funding, a public statement hearing and evidentiary ev·i·den·tia·ry adj. Law 1. Of evidence; evidential. 2. For the presentation or determination of evidence: an evidentiary hearing. Adj. 1. hearings. The process would be completed within a six-month time frame. Because the bill would set a limit of six months for the review of non-major facilities capable of meeting peak electric demands in the short term, there are no provisions for "emergency" exceptions. Consistent with the previous provisions of Article X, all new plants and re-powering projects with a net generating output greater than 80 megawatts would be subject to a 12-month review. The legislation also would establish a new pre-application fee of $50,000 for major projects (80 MW or greater) to be available to intervenors, and a fee of $20,000 for non-major facilities or repowering projects that would increase the net generation by less than 80 MW. If a project application is amended a·mend v. a·mend·ed, a·mend·ing, a·mends v.tr. 1. To change for the better; improve: amended the earlier proposal so as to make it more comprehensive. 2. in a manner requiring additional substantial public review and scrutiny, the New York New York, state, United States New York, Middle Atlantic state of the United States. It is bordered by Vermont, Massachusetts, Connecticut, and the Atlantic Ocean (E), New Jersey and Pennsylvania (S), Lakes Erie and Ontario and the Canadian province of State Board on Electric Generation Siting and the Environment (Siting Board), which oversees the Article X process, would be authorized au·thor·ize tr.v. au·thor·ized, au·thor·iz·ing, au·thor·iz·es 1. To grant authority or power to. 2. To give permission for; sanction: to impose additional fees to defray de·fray tr.v. de·frayed, de·fray·ing, de·frays To undertake the payment of (costs or expenses); pay. [French défrayer, from Old French desfrayer : des-, intervenors' costs. Additional intervenor funding would be provided at $500 per new megawatt meg·a·watt n. Abbr. MW One million watts. meg a·watt for non-major and re-powering
projects and at $1,000 per new megawatt for major projects.
In addition, the Siting Board would be required to determine the environmental justice impacts of projects and conduct a detailed public health and safety review, including assessments of environmental and health impacts. The cumulative air impacts of all operating power plant facilities, along with the addition of the proposed plant, would be considered by the Board, with emphasis on areas in non-attainment with federal air quality standards. |
|
||||||||||||||||

a·watt
Printer friendly
Cite/link
Email
Feedback
Reader Opinion