Potential loss of contribution carryforwards in AMT.In November 1994, Treasury adopted final regulations under Sec. 55. These seemingly innocuous in·noc·u·ous adj. Having no adverse effect; harmless. innocuous (i·näˈ·kyōō· regulations can have unexpected effects on taxpayers with net operating losses Net operating losses Losses that a firm can take advantage of to reduce taxes. (NOLs) and contribution carryovers. Regs. Sec. 1.55-1 (a) requires tax-payers to compute all items for alternative minimum tax (AMT See vPro. ) purposes using regular tax adjusted gross income (AGI (Artificial General Intelligence) A machine intelligence that resembles that of a human being. Considered impossible by many, most artificial intelligence (AI) research, projects and products deal with specific applications such as industrial robots, playing chess, ) or modified AGI. This regulation, supposedly a simplification, can yield a surprising result for an individual with an NOL NOL - Never Offline carryover carryover n. in taxation accounting, using a tax year's deductions, business losses or credits to apply to the following year's tax return to reduce the tax liability. (See: carryback) to a year in which he makes a charitable contribution charitable contribution n. in taxation, a contribution to an organization which is officially created for charitable, religious, educational, scientific, artistic, literary, or other good works. . Example: A, an individual, has AGI for 1995 of $1,000,000 and no preference items. A has an NOL carryover to 1995 of $2,000,000 for regular tax and none for AMT purposes. In 1995, A makes a cash contribution of $800,000 to a public charity. The NOL reduces A's regular tax AGI to zero, which eliminates the regular tax contribution deduction. Under Regs. Sec. 1.55-1, A gets no contribution deduction for AMT purposes either, even though his AGI for AMT purposes is $1,000,000. Under Regs. Sec. 1. 170A-10 (d), for regular tax purposes, the $500,000 that A could deduct absent the NOL becomes an NOL carryover rather than a contribution carryover. Thus, for 1996, A has an NOL carryover of $1,500,000 and a contribution carryover of $300,000, subject to the percentage limitations. A has no other NOL carryover for AMT. Thus, it appears that A's only 1996 carryover deduction is the contribution carryover, subject to the limitations that apply for regular tax purposes. If A is in a similar position in 1996, more of the contribution carryover will become converted to an NOL carryover. Informal conversations with the IRS An abbreviation for the Internal Revenue Service, a federal agency charged with the responsibility of administering and enforcing internal revenue laws. National Office indicate that the proper result is that there will be an AMT NOL carryover to 1996 of $500,000 in this case. Assuming there are no 1995 preferences, the taxpayer may treat the contribution portion of the $1.5 million NOL carryover as having arisen in 1995. Consequently, in the above example, for AMT purposes, A will have a $500,000 NOL carryover and a $300,000 contribution carryover to 1996. If A had any 1995 preferences, this result would be different. Prior to the final regulations, the service issued Letter Ruling (TAM) 9320003, which required tax-payers to separately compute percentage limits based on AMT AGI and compute separate carryovers. The 1994 instructions to Form 6251, Alternative Minimum Tax-Individuals, also require separate computations for AMT purposes. These items have no further effect after the adoption of the final regulations. Taxpayers may want to reduce AMT exposure for a tax year by making substantial charitable contributions. If there are NOL carryovers to that year, such contributions may not yield any current year benefit. |
|
||||||||||||||||||

Printer friendly
Cite/link
Email
Feedback
Reader Opinion