Printer Friendly
The Free Library
14,582,462 articles and books
Member login
User name  
Password 
 
Join us Forgot password?

Positrons, electrons form supernuclei.


Positrons, electrons from supernuclei

Naturally occurring atomic nuclei get as large as about atomic mass atomic mass, the mass of a single atom, usually expressed in atomic mass units  250. By striking nuclei against each other, however, physicists can sometimes make them amalgamate for a fleeting moment into something like a supernucleus, with atomic weight atomic weight, mean (weighted average) of the masses of all the naturally occurring isotopes of a chemical element, as contrasted with atomic mass, which is the mass of any individual isotope.  around 500. One thing such a supernucleus has is an extremely strong electric field. And physicists were hoping that in this way they could make a field strong enough to produce positrons out of the vacuum--or, as some of them put it, to produce positrons by ionizing space-time itself.

Experiments at the Gesellschaft fur Schwerionenforschung (GSI GSI - Gensym Standard Interface ) in Darmstadt, West Germany, are in fact finding positrons that come out of such heavy-nucleus collisions. However, these positrons seem to come not from the vacuum but from some other source, perhaps a new kind of subatomic particle. Such a particle, if it is real, would be something unexpected by current theories of subatomic particles.

At last week's meeting of the American Physical Society The American Physical Society was founded in 1899 and is the world's second largest organization of physicists. The Society publishes more than a dozen science journals, including the world renowned Physical Review and Physical Review Letters, and organizes more than twenty science  in Washington, D.C., Jack Greenberg of Yale University described the course of the experiments, which began about a decade ago and now include three international groups known as EPOS (Electronic Point Of Sale) See point of sale. , ORANGE and TORI. Theorists had predicted that if a nucleus could be made with atomic number (that is, electric charge) greater than 173, it would produce an electric field strong enough to bring the energy of its innermost shell of electrons to the energy of the "Dirac sea.'

Decades ago, as part of his prediction of the existence of antimatter antimatter: see antiparticle.
antimatter

Substance composed of elementary particles having the mass and electric charge of ordinary matter (such as electrons and protons) but for which the charge and related magnetic properties are opposite in sign.
, the late P.A. M. Dirac postulated that the vacuum, which physicists regard as the zero energy level devoid of all matter or energy, actually contains a sea of virtual electron-positron pairs, which can be pulled into actual existence by the proper forces. As an electric force of a certain strength can ionize i·on·ize
v.
To dissociate atoms or molecules into electrically charged atoms or radicals.



ion·iz
 an atom, pulling positive and negative charges apart, so this procedure, in the words of D. Allan Bromley
See also Allan Bromley, Australian historian of computing.
David Allan Bromley (May 4, 1926 – February 10, 2005) was a Canadian-American physicist, academic administrator and a science advisor to President George H. W. Bush.
 of Yale, "ionizes space-time itself,' producing a positive and a negative charge.

The electric field of the supernucleus should do this, if there is a vacancy among the electrons of the innermost shell into which the new electron can fall. The positron positron: see antiparticle.
positron

Subatomic particle having the same mass as an electron but with an electric charge of +1 (an electron has a charge of −1). It constitutes the antiparticle (see antimatter) of an electron.
 would then come out to be detected. The first experiments, which collided uranium against thorium thorium (thôr`ēəm) [from Thor], radioactive chemical element; symbol Th; at. no. 90; at. wt. 232.0381; m.p. about 1,750°C;; b.p. about 4,790°C;; sp. gr. 11.7 at 20°C;; valence +4.  to produce a supernucleus with charge number 188, brought forth positrons that seemed to be the right kind. Checking the result, the experimenters then tried thorium on thorium. Theory predicts that the energy of the positrons should increase as the 20th power of the nuclear charge, so with this combination they expected a fivefold increase in positron energy. Positrons came out with the same energy as before. Every combination they tried produced positrons with about the same energy.

By now suspecting they were seeing positrons from some unexpected source, the experimenters tried thorium against tantulum to produce a supernucleus with charge 163, well below the theoretical threshold for producing positrons from the vacuum. Again they found positrons, and again the positrons had more or less the same energy.

Then they decided to look for something else produced with the positrons, if anything. The positrons have a very sharply defined energy, and that means they have to come from a process that produces a positron and only one other particle. The two obvious candidates for the other object are a neutrino neutrino (ntrē`nō) [Ital.,=little neutral (particle)], elementary particle with no electric charge and a very small mass emitted during the decay of certain other particles.  and an electron. Electrons are easier to detect, so the experimenters started with them. Most recently, Greenberg reports, they have started to find electrons of the proper energy.

The experimenters now suppose that some new subatomic particle, electrically neutral with a mass three to four times that of the electron, is produced in these nucleus-nucleus collisions, and it then decays to an electron-positron pair. So far its existence is only supposition needing much more experimental work for confirmation, but if it is confirmed, Greenberg says, "it would upset the usual wisdom' about subatomic particles.
COPYRIGHT 1986 Science Service, Inc.
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 1986, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Author:Thomsen, Dietrick E.
Publication:Science News
Date:May 10, 1986
Words:653
Previous Article:New dates for 'early' tools.
Next Article:Oldest marsupial found?
Topics:



Related Articles
All charged up for the positron microscope: using antimatter to make microscopes that matter.
Matter and antimatter spin alike.
Charging ahead on antimatter microscope.
Penned-in positrons: captured positrons create the first antimatter plasma on earth.
Detailing Soviet gamma-ray 'garbage.'
Light goes on for antimatter-rich [H.sub.2]O.(scientists try to create water with antimatter particles)(Brief Article)
Tax measure fails by wide margin.(Elections)(Services, jobs in jeopardy after 71 percent of county voters reject plan)
Guard lawmakers form new group.(TRENDS AND TRANSITIONS)
Degrees of quantumness: shades of gray in particle-wave duality.(This Week)
Stellar spectacular: brightest supernova.(This Week)

Terms of use | Copyright © 2009 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters | Submit articles