Printer Friendly
The Free Library
14,679,951 articles and books
Member login
User name  
Password 
 
Join us Forgot password?

Politics 101.


Did you ever wonder why the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA USDA,
n.pr See United States Department of Agriculture.
) isn't doing everything it can to prevent mad cow disease mad cow disease: see prion.
mad cow disease
 or bovine spongiform encephalopathy (BSE)

Fatal neurodegenerative disease of cattle. Symptoms include behavioral changes (e.g.
? Or why it refuses to encourage farmers to find ways to produce meat and dairy products with less Memo from MFJ MFJ Married Filing Jointly
MFJ Modified Final Judgment
MFJ Martin F. Jue (founder of MFJ Enterprises, Inc.)
MFJ Modified of Final Judgment
MFJ Meta Font Job
 saturated fat? Or why leaders at the Department of Health and Human Services Noun 1. Department of Health and Human Services - the United States federal department that administers all federal programs dealing with health and welfare; created in 1979
Health and Human Services, HHS
 say they're worried about obesity, but haven't adopted effective strategies to help Americans shed excess pounds or keep from getting fat? Or why Congress rarely passes laws to help prevent heart disease, diabetes, and other diet-related diseases?

Do you think the answer is:

(a) The USDA is largely run by people with former industry ties?

(b) Health and Human Services Noun 1. Health and Human Services - the United States federal department that administers all federal programs dealing with health and welfare; created in 1979
Department of Health and Human Services, HHS
 is part of an administration that receives huge campaign contributions from the food and other industries?

(c) Members of Congress--from both political parties--are awash in food-industry campaign contributions?

(d) All of the above?

If you said anything but (d), take two PAC contributions and call me in the morning.

This column is too small to lay out all the facts about industry's influence on public policies (this entire publication would be too small). But we can get a glimpse by looking at where some of the USDA's top officials came from:

* Ann Veneman, Secretary: law and lobbying firms that specialized in food, agriculture, and other issues, including work for Dole Foods and other companies.

* James R. Moseley, Deputy Secretary: hog and feed-grain farm (owner).

* Floyd D. Gaibler, Deputy Under Secretary for Farm and Foreign Agricultural Services: International Dairy Foods Association and National Cheese Institute/American Butter Institute.

* Mark E Rey, Under Secretary for Natural Resources and Environment: American Forest and Paper Association.

* Joseph J. Jen, Under Secretary for Research, Education and Economics: Campbell Soup's Institute of Research and Technology.

* Bill T. Hawks, Under Secretary for Marketing and Regulatory Programs: pesticide aerial application service (owner).

* Charles Lambert, Deputy Under Secretary for Marketing, and Regulatory Programs: National Cattlemen's Beef Association National Cattlemen's Beef Association or NCBA, an advocacy group for beef producers in the United States, reports that it works "to increase profit opportunities for cattle and beef producers by enhancing the business climate and building consumer demand. .

* Eric Hentges, Director of the Center for Nutrition Policy and Promotion The Center for Nutrition Policy and Promotion (CNPP) is an agency of the U.S. Department of Agriculture created on December 1, 1994, and is the focal point within the USDA where scientific research is linked with the nutritional needs of the American public. : National Pork Board and National Livestock and Meat Board.

* Michael Torrey, former Deputy Assistant Secretary for Congressional Relations: Ice Cream, Milk and Cheese Political Action Committee.

Get the idea? It's hardly an exaggeration to say that the USDA essentially has become a branch of agribusiness.

Now let's look at a few of the food industry's financial "investments" in politicians running for Congress or national offices. According to the Center for Responsive Politics "The Center for Responsive Politics is a non-partisan, non-profit research group based in Washington, D.C. that tracks money in politics, and the effect of money on elections and public policy.  or Common Cause:

* Coca-Cola and PepsiCo: $2.5 million and $2 million between 1995 and 2002.

* Food processing and sales companies: $71 million since 1990.

* The sugar and corn-sweetener industries: $25.5 million from 1997 to 2003.

* Restaurants and bars: $46 million since 1990.

* Beer, liquor, and wine producers: $65 million since 1990.

* Agribusiness: $329 million since 1990.

* Cattle and livestock interests: $22 million since 1990.

It's tough to fight for a safer and more-nutritious food supply, honest food advertising, and better foods in schools when the whole system is rigged for industry and against consumers.

But a good swim upstream is invigorating in·vig·or·ate  
tr.v. in·vig·or·at·ed, in·vig·or·at·ing, in·vig·or·ates
To impart vigor, strength, or vitality to; animate: "A few whiffs of the raw, strong scent of phlox invigorated her" 
. And you end up stronger for it.

FOOD ALLERGY VICTORY!

In an effort that started with an April 2001 article in Nutrition Action Health-letter, CSPI CSPI Center for Science in the Public Interest
CSPI Corporate Service Price Index
CSPI Cumulative Schedule Performance Index
 helped persuade Congress to pass the Food Allergy Labeling and Consumer Protection Act in July. Among other things, the law will require food labels to disclose when natural flavorings and colorings contain the most common allergens. It also mandates that the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), agency of the U.S. Public Health Service since 1973, with headquarters in Atlanta; it was established in 1946 as the Communicable Disease Center.  monitor food-allergy deaths. Thanks to all the Nutrition Action subscribers who wrote letters and e-mails to legislators and government officials.
COPYRIGHT 2004 Center for Science in the Public Interest
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2004, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:On The Web: www.cspinet.org; U.S. Department of Agriculture
Author:Jacobson, Michael F.
Publication:Nutrition Action Healthletter
Article Type:Column
Geographic Code:1USA
Date:Sep 1, 2004
Words:602
Previous Article:Give me strength: why you need to lift weights.(Interview)
Next Article:A latte hooey.(Coffee-mate Latte Creations)(Brief Article)
Topics:



Related Articles
Down for the count. (suggestion that caffeine content be listed on food labels is rebuked by the Grocery Manufacturers of America despite potential...
MEAT & POULTRY LABELING: CLOSE THE LOOPHOLES.(Brief Article)
Untangling the Web. (How to Find Useful Nutrition & Health Information On Line).
Fakers in the food aisles. .(www.cspinet.org)
By the numbers: a data bank on education trends for district leaders.(school lunch programs and trends)
Big problem, small solution.(On The Web)
McLabeling.(McDonald's Corp. plans to put Nutrition Facts labels )
Model Food Emergency Response Plan.(EH Update)

Terms of use | Copyright © 2009 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters | Submit articles