Printer Friendly

Placebo buster.

Placebo buster

There is a growing chorus of scientific criticism that brands psychotherapy research as inadequate because, unlike behavior therapy and drug treatments, the benefits of psychotherapy have not been compared with those of inactive, "placebo' treatments. But this argument, responds psychologist Morris Parloff of American University in Washington, D.C., should be bronzed and shelved with other outdated psychotherapy research techniques.

"In the field of psychotherapy, the term placebo is both conceptually grotesque and operationally infeasible--or nearly so,' writes Parloff in the February JOURNAL OF CONSULTING AND CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY.

One problem, he argues, is that the medical concept of a placebo--an inactive medication prescribed to placate a patient rather than treat a real disorder--is exceedingly difficult to apply to a host of psychotherapies. Since there is no consensus on the active ingredients of each therapy, he says, designing a placebo treatment is an exercise in futility. Specific techniques are not a good benchmark, says Parloff; patients tend to be reassured by the expertise of therapists who emphasize techniques and procedures, thus encouraging inadvertent placebo effects. In any case, he adds, many therapists are more concerned with nonspecific factors, such as the quality and strength of the relationship with a patient. And unlike drug researchers, therapists would know if they were dispensing a placebo or experimental intervention. The enthusiasm of placebo therapists, and the confidence of their patients, would inevitably suffer.

If not placebo controls, then what? Psychotherapy studies already have shown that many types of therapy can have positive effects, points out Parloff, but the myth has flowered that each treatment is equally effective for all kinds of disorders. He proposes that researchers now compare treatments with different types of interventions (say, instructing patients on how to think about problems in new ways versus fostering emotional expression and psychological insight) and see what works best for specific problems. The patient-therapist relationship, treatment length and other nonspecific variables could be held largely constant across therapies.

"I am not sanguine that the doubts nurtured by psychotherapy's most intense and imaginative critics will be appeased [by new placebo studies],' notes Parloff. "But the placebo challenge, as proposed, is ill-conceived.'
COPYRIGHT 1986 Science Service, Inc.
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 1986, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:argument against use of placebo controls in psychotherapy research
Publication:Science News
Date:Mar 29, 1986
Words:357
Previous Article:Cows have conservative hormones.
Next Article:Plant hormone in mammalian brain.
Topics:


Related Articles
Tax measure fails by wide margin.
10 activists or terrorists? Judge weighs arguments.
LETTERS IN THE EDITOR'S MAILBAG.
Back off veto threat.
MS pills are making news.
What we are doing about symptoms that can't be measured easily.
The Whistleblower: Confessions of a Healthcare Hitman.
Do you know your reader?
Citing Merck misconduct, jurors find for plaintiff in Vioxx retrial.
Cell of Cells: The Global Race to Capture and Control the Stem Cell.

Terms of use | Copyright © 2016 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters