Printer Friendly
The Free Library
14,599,653 articles and books
Member login
User name  
Password 
 
Join us Forgot password?

Piscottano v. Murphy.


U.S. District Court

DISCIPLINE

FREE SPEECH

ASSOCIATION

Piscottano v. Murphy, 317 F.Supp.2d 97 (D.Conn. 2004). State corrections officers filed a [section] 1983 action alleging that prison officials disciplined them in violation of their First and Fourteenth Amendment Fourteenth Amendment, addition to the U.S. Constitution, adopted 1868. The amendment comprises five sections. Section 1


Section 1 of the amendment declares that all persons born or naturalized in the United States are American citizens and citizens
 rights for associating with a motorcycle group, the Outlaws Motorcycle Club This article is about "American-style" motorcycle clubs (MCs) as a specific cultural phenomenon, not motorcycle riding clubs in the generic sense of the term.

A Motorcycle Club
. The district court denied the officers' motion for injunctive relief injunctive relief n. a court-ordered act or prohibition against an act or condition which has been requested, and sometimes granted, in a petition to the court for an injunction. , finding that their First Amendment right to freedom of association had not been violated, and that the directive under which the disciplinary actions were taken was not impermissibly im·per·mis·si·ble  
adj.
Not permitted; not permissible: impermissible behavior.



im
 overbroad. The court also held that the officers failed to establish serious questions as to the merits of their claim that the disciplinary actions violated their equal protection rights. According to according to
prep.
1. As stated or indicated by; on the authority of: according to historians.

2. In keeping with: according to instructions.

3.
 the court, riding motorcycles, going to parties and bonding with friends did not involve matters of public concern, where the purpose of the officers' association with the gang was entirely social in nature, the gang had a national reputation for violence and crime, and the state had serious problems with gang violence in prisons. (Connecticut Department of Corrections)
COPYRIGHT 2004 CRS, Inc.
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2004, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:state corrections officers sues prison officials
Publication:Corrections Caselaw Quarterly
Article Type:Brief Article
Geographic Code:1U1CT
Date:Aug 1, 2004
Words:179
Previous Article:Allegheny County Prison Emp. v. County of Allegh.(county jail employees alleges employee search policy)(Brief Article)
Next Article:Spiegla v. Hull.(prison employee sues prison officials for retaliation for her free speech rights)(Brief Article)
Topics:



Related Articles
Ortiz v. Voinovich.(inmate sues correction officers alleging sexual assaul and administrative segregation)(Brief Article)
Sand v. Steele.(inmate alleges cruel and unusual punishment by correction officers)(Brief Article)
Ortiz v. Voinovich.(sexual abuse by corrections officer)(Brief Article)
Ortiz v. Voinovich.(sexual assault case)(Brief Article)
Ray v. Kertes.(ACCESS TO COURTS)(Brief Article)
Ray v. Kertes.(EX-OFFENDERS)(case regarding assault)(Brief Article)
Ray v. Kertes.(GRIEVANCE PROCEDURES, PRISONER)(Brief Article)
Roland v. Murphy.(illegal search of body cavity)(Brief Article)
Childers v. Maloney.(prisoner sues prison officials for violating his due process rights )(Brief Article)
Personnel.(Barstow v. Shea)(Getz v. Board)(Corrections, Gorski v. New Hampshire Dept. of)

Terms of use | Copyright © 2009 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters | Submit articles