Photographic joy.BUILDING WITH LIGHT: THE INTERNATIONAL HISTORY OF ARCHITECTURAL PHOTOGRAPHY Based on the concept of capturing architecture in its most perfect form for posterity, architectural photography is marriage of photographic skill, technical aptitude, artistic vision and whimsical thinking. By Robert Elwall. London: Merrell. 2004. [pounds sterling]39.95 It is now nearly seventeen years since Robinson and Herschman's monumental mon·u·men·tal adj. 1. Of, resembling, or serving as a monument. 2. Impressively large, sturdy, and enduring. 3. Architecture Transformed. A new account of the continuing relationship between architecture and photography is therefore to be welcomed, particularly one written on this side of the Atlantic and with the added bonus of colour reproduction. Elwall's previous work in this field was a small paperback, Photography takes Command, 1994, to accompany an RIBA RIBA Royal Institute of British Architects exhibition. Although its scope was supposed to be limited by both date and geography, it managed to ignore its boundaries and cram in virtually the whole history of architectural photography. The new book tells the same story, albeit in a considerably more luxurious setting. The main feature of the book is most obviously the multitude of pictures. Elwall has put together a marvellous collection of which the whole is considerably more than the sum of its parts. The quality of reproduction is excellent, with colour occasionally, and unexpectedly, used to suggest the qualities of albumen al·bu·men n. 1. The white of an egg, which consists mainly of albumin dissolved in water. 2. Albumin. albumen the white of the egg; typically comprising 60% of a bird egg. prints and daguerrotypes. Photographically, the book is a joy. But therein also lies a problem. Although the text has been allowed to expand to encompass the international, there is just not enough space for words as opposed to pictures. The story hurtles onward on·ward adj. Moving or tending forward. adv. also on·wards In a direction or toward a position that is ahead in space or time; forward. , leaving the reader desperate for the occasional breather, for an opportunity to explore. [ILLUSTRATION OMITTED] Just one example, Elwall says that in the 1860s architectural photography took on 'a pariah status'. It would have been good to have some evidence, and even better to have been given an idea of what was going on in other areas of photography. A comparison between Bedford Lemere's blandness bland adj. bland·er, bland·est 1. Characterized by a moderate, unperturbed, or tranquil quality, especially: a. Pleasant in manner; smooth: a bland smile. b. and, say, Peach Robinson's multi-negative sentimentality Sentimentality Checkers dog given as gift to Nixon; used in his defense of political contributions during presidential campaign (1952). [Am. Hist.: Wallechinsky, 126] Dondi comic strip in which sentimentality is the main motif. might suggest that the former had actually more influence on the development of photography than the 'serious' practitioners. However, to pursue such an essentially pictorial question, illustrations and text need to be integrated. Here, apart from a few very small ones, all the photographs appear together at the ends of chapters. The result is a book of pictures with rather a small text (only 54 pages) attached. or rather, detached. This no doubt pleases the marketing department, but it plays havoc with trying to read it (not at all helped by the weediest of sans serif Short horizontal lines added to the tops and bottoms of traditional typefaces, such as Times Roman. Contrast with sans-serif. Here you can find a graphical version of this table.
But while Elwall has had one hand tied behind his back by the designers, at least it is not his writing one. As with his carlier book, his knowledgeable enthusiasm certainly keeps the momentum going, and the later sections are especially good. Architecture Transformed, being American, ignored European post-war reconstruction, a hole which is here nicely filled. And the story to the present, with colour, is something not to be found elsewhere. Although why is it that of all the colour pictures only one (maybe two?) would not have said exactly the same in black and white? Discuss. |
|
||||||||||||||||||

Printer friendly
Cite/link
Email
Feedback
Reader Opinion