Printer Friendly
The Free Library
14,505,384 articles and books
Member login
User name  
Password 
 
Join us Forgot password?

Phelps v. Tucker.


U.S. District Court

EVIDENCE

DUE PROCESS

Phelps v. Tucker, 370 F.Supp.2d 792 (N.D.Ind. 2005). A state prisoner one in confinement, or under arrest, for a political offense.

See also: State
 brought a civil rights action against prison personnel alleging violating of his Fourteenth Amendment Fourteenth Amendment, addition to the U.S. Constitution, adopted 1868. The amendment comprises five sections. Section 1


Section 1 of the amendment declares that all persons born or naturalized in the United States are American citizens and citizens
 procedural due process rights. The district court granted summary judgment, in part, for the prisoner and in part for certain defendants. The court held that prison personnel did not "destroy" a surveillance videotape, for the purpose of the prisoner's Fourteenth Amendment procedural due process claim that the tape was destroyed to prevent him from using it in his defense. The court noted that the tapes were recycled or reused in the normal course of business if not requested by the conduct adjustment board or an internal affairs Internal affairs may refer to:
  • Internal affairs of a sovereign state.
  • Internal affairs (law enforcement), a division of a law enforcement agency which investigates cases of lawbreaking by members of that agency
 officer within thirty days, and the tape had not been requested within the thirty days. The court found that prison personnel violated the prisoner's Fourteenth Amendment procedural due process rights by denying his request for a video surveillance tape for his defense in a disciplinary hearing. The court noted that due process entitles prisoner to have exculpatory evidence Exculpatory evidence is the evidence favorable to the defendant in a criminal trial, which clears or tends to clear the defendant of guilt. In many countries such as the United States, if the police or prosecutor has found such evidence, he/she must disclose it to the defendant.  disclosed unless its disclosure would unduly threaten institutional concerns. The court found that the prisoner's claim was not extinguished ex·tin·guish  
tr.v. ex·tin·guished, ex·tin·guish·ing, ex·tin·guish·es
1. To put out (a fire, for example); quench.

2. To put an end to (hopes, for example); destroy. See Synonyms at abolish.

3.
 by the reversal of his loss of good-time credits due to a successful administrative appeal. (Indiana)
COPYRIGHT 2005 CRS, Inc.
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2005, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:civil rights action
Publication:Corrections Caselaw Quarterly
Article Type:Brief Article
Geographic Code:1U3IN
Date:Aug 1, 2005
Words:216
Previous Article:Lekas v. Briley.(conditions of confinement)(Brief Article)
Next Article:Rodriguez v. Briley.(Brief Article)
Topics:



Related Articles
Lawyer in tune with the 'Times.(Brief Article)
Between Civil Rights and Black Power in the gateway city: the action committee to improve opportunities for negroes (ACTION), 1964-75.(Author...
Alkire v. Irving.(CIVIL RIGHTS)(case regarding civil commitment)(Brief Article)
Wever v. Lincoln County, Nebraska.(FAILURE TO PROTECT)(Brief Article)
Wever v. Lincoln County, Nebraska.(LIABILITY)(Brief Article)
Wever v. Lincoln County, Nebraska.(violation of United States Constitution. 14th Amendment)(Brief Article)
Odenwalt v. Gillis.(civil rights case)(Brief Article)
Odenwalt v. Gillis.(violation of United States Constitution. 8th Amendment and United States Constitution. 14th Amendment)(Brief Article)
Deathmongers.(FROM THE READERS)(Letter to the editor)

Terms of use | Copyright © 2009 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters | Submit articles