Printer Friendly
The Free Library
14,506,210 articles and books
Member login
User name  
Password 
 
Join us Forgot password?

Pheasants Forever Concerned about the Future of the Conservation Reserve Program; Letter to USDA Secretary Veneman Requests Meeting.


Business Editors/Environment Writers

ST. PAUL St. Paul

as a missionary he fearlessly confronts the “perils of waters, of robbers, in the city, in the wilderness.” [N.T.: II Cor. 11:26]

See : Bravery
, Minn.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Dec. 4, 2003

Today, in a letter sent to U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA USDA,
n.pr See United States Department of Agriculture.
) Secretary Ann M. Veneman, Pheasants Forever outlined concerns for the future of the Conservation Reserve Program (CRP C-reactive protein (CRP)
A protein present in blood serum in various abnormal states, like inflammation.

Mentioned in: Pelvic Inflammatory Disease

CRP,
n.pr See C-reactive protein.
). The letter criticized low acceptance rates for the 26th general CRP sign-up conducted last spring and recent changes to the program's management policies. The letter also requested a meeting with Secretary Veneman to discuss these issues and the future of CRP.

In the letter, Pheasants Forever outlined four major areas of concern. The first area cited was the very low 48 percent acceptance rate during the 26th general CRP sign-up. In fact, the USDA only accepted 2 million acres of the 4.1 million offered, despite being budgeted for accepting 2.8 million acres. Of special concern are North and South Dakota South Dakota (dəkō`tə), state in the N central United States. It is bordered by North Dakota (N), Minnesota and Iowa (E), Nebraska (S), and Wyoming and Montana (W).  where those states saw only a 17 and 9 percent acceptance rate, respectively. Pheasants Forever blamed the brief timeframe allotted al·lot  
tr.v. al·lot·ted, al·lot·ting, al·lots
1. To parcel out; distribute or apportion: allotting land to homesteaders; allot blame.

2.
 for the sign-up and a lack of technical assistance available during the sign-up as the determining factors of the poor acceptance rates. Secondly, the letter addressed some Farm Service Agency (FSA FSA Financial Services Authority
FSA Food Standards Agency (UK)
FSA Farm Service Agency (USDA)
FSA Financial Services Agency (Japan) 
) actions related to shortening critical nesting and brood-rearing periods for wildlife. Reductions to these periods may allow habitat disturbance during a time that is sensitive for wildlife production. Similarly, Pheasants Forever's third area of concern involved other FSA actions related to over-aggressive management of haying and grazing. While Pheasants Forever understands the need to maintain, manage, hay, and graze CRP lands, Pheasants Forever feels that management policy decisions should be based upon the benefits to soil, water, air, and wildlife. Finally, Pheasants Forever addressed recent changes made to the wetland restoration practice known as CP-23. These changes require a majority of hydric soils, a roll back on eligible lands, and restrictions on land within the 100-year floodplain floodplain, level land along the course of a river formed by the deposition of sediment during periodic floods. Floodplains contain such features as levees, backswamps, delta plains, and oxbow lakes. . Pheasants Forever believes that these changes are significant enough that landowners may find it extremely difficult to qualify their wetlands for enrollment, especially impacting the Prairie Pothole Region Prairie Pothole Region, large geographic area of central North America consisting of grass-covered wetlands. Stretching northwest from N Iowa through SW Minnesota, E South Dakota, E and N North Dakota, SW Manitoba, and S Saskatchewan to SE and E central Alberta (and  of the Northern Plains.

"We are very concerned about recent USDA actions related to the Conservation Reserve Program," explained Howard Vincent, Pheasants Forever CEO (1) (Chief Executive Officer) The highest individual in command of an organization. Typically the president of the company, the CEO reports to the Chairman of the Board. . "CRP has become the benchmark by which all other conservation programs are judged. CRP's benefits to soil, water, air, wildlife and rural economies have been tremendous. With the shortcomings A shortcoming is a character flaw.

Shortcomings may also be:
  • Shortcomings (SATC episode), an episode of the television series Sex and the City
 of the last sign-up so apparent, we wanted to address these issues now before a new CRP sign-up is in place. Consequently, we have requested an audience with Secretary Veneman and her staff to outline our concerns. Our hope is that we can work together to continue CRP's natural resource legacy."

Originally established in 1985, CRP offers annual payments for 10-15 year contracts to participants who establish grass, shrubs, and tree cover on environmentally sensitive lands, thus providing important financial stability for farmers and landowners. According to the USDA, CRP payments average $5,315 per farm annually. In addition, CRP lands contribute at least $4.7 billion annually from hunting expenditures, much of which support rural communities. These CRP lands have also been shown to improve water quality and protect environmentally sensitive soils from erosion. Likewise, CRP has provided a great boost for pheasants and other wildlife. In fact, CRP's wildlife benefits were instrumental in convincing Congress to reauthorize the program in 1996 and again in 2002.
COPYRIGHT 2003 Business Wire
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2003, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Publication:Business Wire
Date:Dec 4, 2003
Words:559
Previous Article:Alcatel Powers e-government Network in the Guangxi Province of China.
Next Article:ipUnplugged CTO Jan Forslow to Speak at Wi-Fi Planet Conference & Expo Fall 2003.



Related Articles
Veneman Says Food Agencies "Working Together" on Safety Issues.(Brief Article)
Veneman Reiterates USDA's Commitment to Food Safety.(Brief Article)
USDA 2003 Budget shows increase in Food Safety Funding.(Brief Article)
House Democrats ask USDA for explanation of safety breakdown that led to Listeria outbreak.(Wampler Foods plant)(Brief Article)
Concern in Washington about school lunch safety. (In Washington).(delay in warning about possible contamination)(Brief Article)
USDA expands BSE surveillance program.
USDA pressured by senators to withdraw plan to allow Canadian beef into the United States.
Pressure continues for private BSE testing.(Bovine spongiform encephalopathy)(Brief Article)
New USDA secretary to initially focus on food safety and trade.

Terms of use | Copyright © 2009 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters | Submit articles