Pheasants Forever Concerned about the Future of the Conservation Reserve Program; Letter to USDA Secretary Veneman Requests Meeting.Business Editors/Environment Writers ST. PAUL St. Paul as a missionary he fearlessly confronts the “perils of waters, of robbers, in the city, in the wilderness.” [N.T.: II Cor. 11:26] See : Bravery , Minn.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Dec. 4, 2003 Today, in a letter sent to U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA USDA, n.pr See United States Department of Agriculture. ) Secretary Ann M. Veneman, Pheasants Forever outlined concerns for the future of the Conservation Reserve Program (CRP C-reactive protein (CRP) A protein present in blood serum in various abnormal states, like inflammation. Mentioned in: Pelvic Inflammatory Disease CRP, n.pr See C-reactive protein. ). The letter criticized low acceptance rates for the 26th general CRP sign-up conducted last spring and recent changes to the program's management policies. The letter also requested a meeting with Secretary Veneman to discuss these issues and the future of CRP. In the letter, Pheasants Forever outlined four major areas of concern. The first area cited was the very low 48 percent acceptance rate during the 26th general CRP sign-up. In fact, the USDA only accepted 2 million acres of the 4.1 million offered, despite being budgeted for accepting 2.8 million acres. Of special concern are North and South Dakota South Dakota (dəkō`tə), state in the N central United States. It is bordered by North Dakota (N), Minnesota and Iowa (E), Nebraska (S), and Wyoming and Montana (W). where those states saw only a 17 and 9 percent acceptance rate, respectively. Pheasants Forever blamed the brief timeframe allotted al·lot tr.v. al·lot·ted, al·lot·ting, al·lots 1. To parcel out; distribute or apportion: allotting land to homesteaders; allot blame. 2. for the sign-up and a lack of technical assistance available during the sign-up as the determining factors of the poor acceptance rates. Secondly, the letter addressed some Farm Service Agency (FSA FSA Financial Services Authority FSA Food Standards Agency (UK) FSA Farm Service Agency (USDA) FSA Financial Services Agency (Japan) ) actions related to shortening critical nesting and brood-rearing periods for wildlife. Reductions to these periods may allow habitat disturbance during a time that is sensitive for wildlife production. Similarly, Pheasants Forever's third area of concern involved other FSA actions related to over-aggressive management of haying and grazing. While Pheasants Forever understands the need to maintain, manage, hay, and graze CRP lands, Pheasants Forever feels that management policy decisions should be based upon the benefits to soil, water, air, and wildlife. Finally, Pheasants Forever addressed recent changes made to the wetland restoration practice known as CP-23. These changes require a majority of hydric soils, a roll back on eligible lands, and restrictions on land within the 100-year floodplain floodplain, level land along the course of a river formed by the deposition of sediment during periodic floods. Floodplains contain such features as levees, backswamps, delta plains, and oxbow lakes. . Pheasants Forever believes that these changes are significant enough that landowners may find it extremely difficult to qualify their wetlands for enrollment, especially impacting the Prairie Pothole Region Prairie Pothole Region, large geographic area of central North America consisting of grass-covered wetlands. Stretching northwest from N Iowa through SW Minnesota, E South Dakota, E and N North Dakota, SW Manitoba, and S Saskatchewan to SE and E central Alberta (and of the Northern Plains. "We are very concerned about recent USDA actions related to the Conservation Reserve Program," explained Howard Vincent, Pheasants Forever CEO (1) (Chief Executive Officer) The highest individual in command of an organization. Typically the president of the company, the CEO reports to the Chairman of the Board. . "CRP has become the benchmark by which all other conservation programs are judged. CRP's benefits to soil, water, air, wildlife and rural economies have been tremendous. With the shortcomings A shortcoming is a character flaw. Shortcomings may also be:
Originally established in 1985, CRP offers annual payments for 10-15 year contracts to participants who establish grass, shrubs, and tree cover on environmentally sensitive lands, thus providing important financial stability for farmers and landowners. According to the USDA, CRP payments average $5,315 per farm annually. In addition, CRP lands contribute at least $4.7 billion annually from hunting expenditures, much of which support rural communities. These CRP lands have also been shown to improve water quality and protect environmentally sensitive soils from erosion. Likewise, CRP has provided a great boost for pheasants and other wildlife. In fact, CRP's wildlife benefits were instrumental in convincing Congress to reauthorize the program in 1996 and again in 2002. |
|
||||||||||||

Printer friendly
Cite/link
Email
Feedback
Reader Opinion