Printer Friendly

Pesticidal plants face legal hurdle.

Pesticidal plants face legal hurdle

As scientists prepare genetically altered plants for commercial sales, federal policymakers are planning a difficult regulatory obstacle for plants genetically engineered to kill viral or insect pests. The Environmental Protection Agency has proposed considering a pesticidal product produced by a plant gene to be a chemical pesticide, subject to the exposure tolerance and registration requirements under the pesticide law, says Fred S. Betz of EPA's Office of Pesticide Programs.

Before EPA proposed the new rule, the only regulatory certainty regarding pesticide-producing transgenic plants was that the U.S. Department of Agriculture has jurisdiction over small-scale field trials, says Robert B. Nicholas, a Washington, D.C.-based attorney. No large-scale trials have yet been conducted with pesticidal plants, Betz says.

Under the new rule, genetically engineered plants would be treated differently from similar, traditionally bred plants, which do not have to go through the pesticide review process. The engineered varieties also would undergo more legal scrutiny than biological pest-control agents, whose approval process typically takes one to two years and costs less than $500,000. This contrasts with the five to 10 years and $10 million to $50 million required for approval of chemical pesticides, Nicholas says.

In its new delivery system, the Bacillus thuringiensis toxin gene -- the insect-killing molecule most frequently inserted into plants -- may have to be partially reevaluated as a chemical pesticide despite the toxin's long history of use in its natural form -- from bacteria -- as a biological pest-control agent, Nicholas told SCIENCE NEWS.

An EPA working group must now draft the specifics of the proposed regulation before it can become official policy, Betz says.
COPYRIGHT 1989 Science Service, Inc.
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 1989, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:Biotechnology
Author:Wickelgren, Ingrid
Publication:Science News
Date:May 13, 1989
Words:272
Previous Article:New genes for complete-protein beams.
Next Article:What's that wiggling in my sushi?
Topics:


Related Articles
The revolution will not be fertilized.
Please pass the genes: experts weigh worries of engineered ills in new food crops.
Crop-weed offspring show hardy streak.
The regulation of genetically engineered plants: is Peter Rabbit safe in Mr. McGregor's transgenic vegetable patch?
Bio-serfdom and the new feudalism.
National Researh Council Weighs in on Transgenic Plants.
Cultivating biotech trees.
Playing God with Potatoes: Consumers want to know when they're eating genetically altered food--but the subject of labeling is controversial.
Making the case for ag biotech investment. (Investing).

Terms of use | Copyright © 2016 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters