Printer Friendly
The Free Library
14,574,058 articles and books
Member login
User name  
Password 
 
Join us Forgot password?

Pelland v. Rhode Island.


U.S. District Court

PROBATION-CONDITIONS

Pelland v. Rhode Island Rhode Island, island, United States
Rhode Island, island, 15 mi (24 km) long and 5 mi (8 km) wide, S R.I., at the entrance to Narragansett Bay. It is the largest island in the state, with steep cliffs and excellent beaches.
, 317 F.Supp.2d 86 (D.R.I. 2004). A sex offender probationer A convict who is released from prison provided he maintains good behavior. One who is on Probation whereby she is given some freedom to reenter society subject to the condition that for a specified period the individual conduct herself in a manner approved by a special officer  challenged Rhode Island's enforcement of a policy that curtailed the right of sex offender probationers to travel interstate. The district court entered judgment for the state, finding that the probationer had no right to travel interstate, and the policy did not violate equal protection nor result in an Ex Post Facto ex post facto adj. Latin for "after the fact," which refers to laws adopted after an act is committed making it illegal although it was legal when done, or increases the penalty for a crime after it is committed. Such laws are specifically prohibited by the U. S.  violation. The court noted that the policy did not proscribe pro·scribe  
tr.v. pro·scribed, pro·scrib·ing, pro·scribes
1. To denounce or condemn.

2. To prohibit; forbid. See Synonyms at forbid.

3.
a. To banish or outlaw (a person).
 interstate travel altogether, but merely imposed various conditions that the Department of Corrections had deemed useful for monitoring the movement of sex offenders who were on probation (Rhode Island Department of Corrections)
COPYRIGHT 2004 CRS, Inc.
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2004, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:law enforcement policy curtails right of sex offenders' interstate travel
Publication:Corrections Caselaw Quarterly
Article Type:Brief Article
Geographic Code:1U1RI
Date:Aug 1, 2004
Words:115
Previous Article:Cline v. Fox.(SERVICES-PRISONER)(Brief Article)
Next Article:Royal v. Durison.(SENTENCE)(Brief Article)
Topics:



Related Articles
U.S. Appeals Court: EX POST FACTO SEX OFFENDER.(prisoners and prisons)(Brief Article)
U.S. District Court: TRANSFERS PRIVACY.(Brief Article)
U.S. District Court: SEX OFFENDER.(Brief Article)
U.S. District Court: SEX OFFENDER.(Brief Article)
U.S. appeals court sex offenders. (Ex-Offenders).(Brief Article)
U.S. appeals court sex offenders ex post facto. (Release).(Brief Article)
U.S. appeals court sex offenders ex post facto. (Sentence).(Brief Article)
Ex-offenders.(Brief Article)
Hatton v. Bonner.(sex offender petitioned for habeas corpus relief)(Brief Article)
Doe v. Moore.(Doe v. Moore, 410 F.3d 1337)(Brief Article)

Terms of use | Copyright © 2009 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters | Submit articles