Printer Friendly
The Free Library
14,736,044 articles and books
Member login
User name  
Password 
 
Join us Forgot password?

Patients' Rights Bill Advances.


The House and Senate passed versions of a patients' rights The legal interests of persons who submit to medical treatment.

For many years, common medical practice meant that physicians made decisions for their patients. This paternalistic view has gradually been supplanted by one promoting patient autonomy, whereby patients and
 bill late last year that could have health insurers bracing for an onslaught of lawsuits.

The legislation will move to a House-Senate conference committee to come up with one bill, possibly this spring.

The nightmares for health insurers began when the House passed the Norwood-Dingell Patients' Bill of Rights Act of 1999, a version supported by the White House. The legislation includes guaranteed payment for emergency care, the right to see specialists, the right to independent medical review of health-plan denials and the right to sue a health plan in state court.

Sponsored by Reps. Charles Norwood
For the American congressman see Charlie Norwood


Sir Charles Norwood (23 August 1871 – 26 November 1966), full name Charles John Boyd Norwood, was the twenty-third Mayor of Wellington, New Zealand from 1925 to 1927.
, R-Ga., and John Dingell John David Dingell, Jr. (born in Colorado Springs, Colorado, July 8 1926) is a Democratic United States Representative from Michigan and is currently the Dean (longest-serving member) of the House of Representatives, with a tenure longer than the entire current time served of 121 , DMich., the bill would expand healthcare liability to health plans and the employers who sponsor them. Under the bill, employers who voluntarily provide health insurance to their employees would be exposed to a number of new lawsuits in state courts, according to according to
prep.
1. As stated or indicated by; on the authority of: according to historians.

2. In keeping with: according to instructions.

3.
 opponents.

"A victory for the dark side," is how Richard Coorsh, spokesman for the Washington-based Health Insurance Association of America described passage of the bill. "The needs of American consumers have been sacrificed at the twin altars of political expediency ex·pe·di·en·cy  
n. pl. ex·pe·di·en·cies
1. Appropriateness to the purpose at hand; fitness.

2. Adherence to self-serving means:
 and the predatory trial bar."

He said provisions in the bill would raise costs to consumers and increase the number of uninsured people by exposing employers and health plans to lawsuits seeking unlimited punitive damages Monetary compensation awarded to an injured party that goes beyond that which is necessary to compensate the individual for losses and that is intended to punish the wrongdoer. . An HIAA HIAA,
n.pr the abbreviation for Health Insurance Association of America.
 study also determined that the bill would call for more than 400 mandates, which "would be paid for by higher premiums charged both to employers and employees," Coorsh said.

The American Medical Association American Medical Association (AMA), professional physicians' organization (founded 1847). Its goals are to protect the interests of American physicians, advance public health, and support the growth of medical science. , on the other hand, hailed the legislation. "Today we are one giant step closer to a law that allows physicians to make medical decisions, that allows patients to appeal if their care is delayed or denied," said Thomas R. Reardon, president of the group.

Insurers appear to be moving in that direction even before any legislation is enacted.

In November, United Healthcare gave doctors the final say on which treatments their patients receive, and the move was expected to spark similar actions by other health plans. Aetna Inc. already has indicated that it intends to move in that direction.

"We were only saying no one out of 100 times," said Lee Newcomer, senior vice president of health policy and strategy for UnitedHealth, "but the perception was that we were saying no 99 out of 100 times."
COPYRIGHT 2000 A.M. Best Company, Inc.
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2000, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Author:Kelly, Dennis
Publication:Best's Review
Article Type:Brief Article
Geographic Code:1USA
Date:Jan 1, 2000
Words:399
Previous Article:Financial Services Deregulated.
Next Article:Lawyers, Guns and Money.(class action lawsuits against tobacco companies, gun manufacturers, health care providers and insurers)(Brief...
Topics:



Related Articles
Congress playing catch-up to California on HMO bills. (health maintenance organization)
A Love Nest for Bill and Hill.(a new home for the Clintons: humor)(other news items are included)(Brief Article)
Insurers Fear Cost of Patients' Rights.(analysis of proposed patients' rights law)(Brief Article)
Agents Press Lawmakers on Issues.(insurance legislation)(Brief Article)
A War of Words.(self-insured health insurance industry)
Costs Separate Dueling Bills.(patients' rights)(Brief Article)
President issues Bill of Rights directive. (Short Takes).(Brief Article)
Reader feedback.(Letter to the Editor)
Supreme Court ruling windfall for HMOs may be short-lived.(Highlights from BestWeek)(Health Maintenance Organization)
Human rights and social policy in New Zealand.

Terms of use | Copyright © 2009 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters | Submit articles