Printer Friendly
The Free Library
14,678,926 articles and books
Member login
User name  
Password 
 
Join us Forgot password?

Pate v. U.S.


U.S. District Court

QUASI-JUDICIAL

ABSOLUTE

Pate v. U.S., 277 F.Supp.2d 1 (D.D.C. 2003). The government and a parole board pa`role´ board`

n. 1. A group of individuals with authority to determine whether a prisoner will be granted parole from a particular prison.
 official moved to dismiss a [section] 1983 claim against them, alleging failure to timely schedule a parolee's revocation The recall of some power or authority that has been granted.

Revocation by the act of a party is intentional and voluntary, such as when a person cancels a Power of Attorney that he has given or a will that he has written.
 hearing. The district court denied the government's motion and granted the official's motion. The court held that a delay of 65 days in conducting a parole revocation hearing could, depending on the factual circumstances, amount to a due process violation. The court held that the official was entitled en·ti·tle  
tr.v. en·ti·tled, en·ti·tling, en·ti·tles
1. To give a name or title to.

2. To furnish with a right or claim to something:
 to absolute immunity, also termed quasi-judicial immunity, for tasks that were performed within the scope of her duties. (District of Columbia District of Columbia, federal district (2000 pop. 572,059, a 5.7% decrease in population since the 1990 census), 69 sq mi (179 sq km), on the east bank of the Potomac River, coextensive with the city of Washington, D.C. (the capital of the United States).  Parole Board)
COPYRIGHT 2003 CRS, Inc.
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2003, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:absolute immunity
Publication:Corrections Caselaw Quarterly
Article Type:Brief Article
Geographic Code:1U5DC
Date:Aug 1, 2003
Words:114
Previous Article:Bane v. Virginia Dept. of Corrections.(immunity)(Brief Article)
Next Article:Serrano v. Francis.(IMMUNITY)
Topics:



Related Articles
Civil liability and police-prosecutor relations.
Release.(Brief Article)
Qualified immunity ruling raises hurdles for plaintiffs.
Jones v. Lopez.(cases of false imprisonment)(Brief Article)
Jones v. Lopez.(false imprisonment case)(Brief Article)
Clynch v. Chapman.(person driving under the influence did not get bail)(Brief Article)
Williams v. Consovoy.(immunity)(Brief Article)
Williams v. Consovoy.(violation of due process of law)(Brief Article)
Pate v. U.S.(revocation petition)(Brief Article)
Immunities and defenses for allegedly negligent inspections.(Legal Briefs)

Terms of use | Copyright © 2009 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters | Submit articles