Printer Friendly
The Free Library
14,763,825 articles and books
Member login
User name  
Password 
 
Join us Forgot password?

Padgett v. Ferrero.


U.S. District Court

DNA DNA: see nucleic acid.
DNA
 or deoxyribonucleic acid

One of two types of nucleic acid (the other is RNA); a complex organic compound found in all living cells and many viruses. It is the chemical substance of genes.
 

Padgett v. Ferrero, 294 F. Supp.2d 1338 (N.D.Ga. 2003). Convicted felons brought an action for injunctive relief injunctive relief n. a court-ordered act or prohibition against an act or condition which has been requested, and sometimes granted, in a petition to the court for an injunction.  seeking to have a Georgia law requiring DNA sampling of all convicted felons declared unconstitutional. The district court granted summary judgment in favor of the defendants. The court held that the DNA sampling law was not an unreasonable search and seizure unreasonable search and seizure n. search of an individual or his/her premises (including an automobile) and/or seizure of evidence found in such a search by a law enforcement officer without a search warrant and without "probable cause" to believe evidence of a , did not violate the convicted felons' privacy rights, did not violate the ex post facto ex post facto adj. Latin for "after the fact," which refers to laws adopted after an act is committed making it illegal although it was legal when done, or increases the penalty for a crime after it is committed. Such laws are specifically prohibited by the U. S.  clause, and did not violate due process. (George Department of Corrections)
COPYRIGHT 2004 CRS, Inc.
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2004, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:violation of ex post facto clause
Publication:Corrections Caselaw Quarterly
Article Type:Brief Article
Geographic Code:1U5GA
Date:Nov 1, 2004
Words:92
Previous Article:Gates v. Cook.(prisoners alleges violation of their Eighth Amendment rights)(Brief Article)
Next Article:N.G. v. Connecticut.(violation of United States Constitution. 4th Amendment)(Brief Article)
Topics:



Related Articles
U.S. Appeals Court: EX POST FACTO SUPERVISED RELEASE.(Brief Article)
U.S. Appeals Court: SUPERVISED RELEASE REVOCATION EX POST FACTO.(prisoners and prisons)(Brief Article)
U.S. Appeals Court: PAROLE- DUE PROCESS EX POST FACTO.(prisoners and prisons)(Brief Article)
U.S. appeals court sex offenders. (Ex-Offenders).(Brief Article)
Jones v. Ray.(RELEASE)(violation of due process of law)(Brief Article)
Hunter v. Ayers.(CIVIL RIGHTS)(habeas corpus )(Brief Article)
Hunter v. Ayers.(habeas corpus petition)(Brief Article)
Adler v. Menifee.(violation of ex post facto laws)(Brief Article)
Padgett v. Ferrero.(convicted felons alleges DNA sampling violates their constitutional privacy rights)(Brief Article)
Hatton v. Bonner.(sex offender petitioned for habeas corpus relief)(Brief Article)

Terms of use | Copyright © 2009 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters | Submit articles