PWG Tests Interoperability of Recently Released IETF Internet Printing Protocol--IPP--Standard.Business Editors PISCATAWAY, N.J.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Nov. 20, 2000 Successful Tests Included Firewalls, Proxies and Security The Printer Working Group (PWG PWG Pro Wrestling Guerrilla (Los Angeles, California, USA) PWG Permanent Working Group PWG Project Working Group PWG Peoples War Group (India) PWG Post Weaning Gain PWG Pedalwertgeber ), a program of the IEEE (Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, New York, www.ieee.org) A membership organization that includes engineers, scientists and students in electronics and allied fields. Industry Standards and Technology Organization (IEEE-ISTO), today announced a successful interoperability test of the Internet Printing Protocol The Internet Printing Protocol or IPP, defines a standard protocol for printing as well as managing print jobs, media size, resolution, and so forth. Like all IP-based protocols, IPP can be used locally or over the Internet to printers hundreds or thousands of miles (IPP (Internet Printing Protocol) A protocol for printing and managing print jobs over the Internet using HTTP. Initially conceived by Novell, Xerox and others, the IETF made it a standard in 2000 that includes authentication and encryption. See printing protocol and LPD. ). This test was the third held by the PWG and focused on the new Internet See Web 2.0 and Internet2. Engineering Task Force (IETF See Internet Engineering Task Force. IETF - Internet Engineering Task Force ) proposed standard for IPP. In addition to exercising the basic protocol, tests involving firewalls, proxies and security were performed. Oak Technologies hosted the four-day event (October 17, 2000 through October 20, 2000) at their Woburn, Massachusetts office. Previous tests were hosted by Microsoft and Novell. Eighteen companies, representing printer manufacturers, operating system developers and others, jointly tested their implementations of IPP. Out of the 26 Printer and Client implementations, 20 supported the new proposed standard, IPP version 1.1 (RFC (Request For Comments) A document that describes the specifications for a recommended technology. Although the word "request" is in the title, if the specification is ratified, it becomes a standards document. 2910 and RFC 2911). The remaining six implementations limited their support to IPP version 1.0 (RFC 2568 and RFC 2569). Basic testing consisted of printing simple jobs and obtaining printer status. The overall basic test, including Clients and Printers of both versions, was 93% successful. When the participants were limited to those supporting IPP version 1.1, the success rate increased to 96%. Inter-version tests between Clients and Printers that support both versions were 100% successful. Participants in the IPP interoperability test were Canon, Electronics for Imaging Inc., Epson, IBM (International Business Machines Corporation, Armonk, NY, www.ibm.com) The world's largest computer company. IBM's product lines include the S/390 mainframes (zSeries), AS/400 midrange business systems (iSeries), RS/6000 workstations and servers (pSeries), Intel-based servers (xSeries) , i-data International, Japan Computer Industry, Microsoft, Netreon Inc., NETsilicon Inc., Novell, Oak Technologies, Quality Logic, Ricoh, SEH SEH Structured Exception Handling SEH Societas Europaea Herpetologica SEH Société d'Ecologie Humaine SEH St Elizabeths Hospital (Anacostia, Washington, DC) SEH Safety, Environment and Health SEH St. Computertechnik Gmbh and Xerox. Seventeen Printers and nine Clients were tested. Also present were several Firewall and Proxy vendors, including Axent Technologies Inc., McAfee.com and Microsoft. Firewall and HTTP proxy testing was a complete success. The testing with firewalls demonstrated that administrators could set policy regarding IPP printing. Firewalls were able to block, selectively allow or allow unrestricted printing between IPP Clients and Printers. The firewalls further demonstrated that they could add an additional layer of security requiring IPP Clients to authenticate to the firewall before allowing the IPP request through to a designated printer. The HTTP proxies operated transparently when used in IPP printing. Security testing went well with both SSLv3 and TLS (1) (Transport Layer Security) A security protocol from the IETF that is based on the Secure Sockets Layer (SSL) 3.0 protocol developed by Netscape. TLS uses digital certificates to authenticate the user as well as authenticate the network (in a wireless having no failures with a limited number of Printer/Client combinations (8 and 7, respectively). Basic authentication had the most combinations (59) with a success rate of 93%. The interoperability test involving multiple independently developed implementations of a new standard is useful for determining the quality of the standard. Six issues directly relating to the specifications and their interpretation were identified, only one of which affected basic interoperability. The level of success indicates that the IPP specifications, RFC 2910 and RFC 2911, are complete, well-written standards that ensure ease of implementation. What is IPP? The Internet Printing Protocol is a client/server protocol that allows the server to be either a separate print server or a printer with embedded networking and server capabilities. The focus of this effort is optimized for printers. IPP provides a single, standard interface for interrogating the capabilities and state of a printing system, submitting a print job, and monitoring the state of that print job. IPP is deployed across a broad range of printers, printing systems and operating systems that inter-operate using the protocol. History of the IPP Working Group Chartered by the PWG, the IPP Working Group was formed in November 1996 and began developing necessary standards for print job submission and monitoring for the Internet based on early submissions by many different companies and individuals. After a successful "Birds of a Feather Birds Of a Feather - (BOF) (From the saying "Birds of a feather flock together") An informal discussion group, scheduled on a conference program or formed ad hoc, to consider a specific issue or subject. " session at the December 1996 IETF meeting in San Jose, California San Jose (IPA: /ˌsænhoʊˈzeɪ/) is the third-largest city in California, and the tenth-largest in the United States. It is the county seat of Santa Clara County. , this group was also chartered by the IETF on March 6, 1997. Representatives from Hewlett-Packard, IBM, Lexmark, Microsoft, Novell, Sharp, Sun Microsystems and Xerox act as chairs, authors and editors for the IPP project. Internet drafts covering requirements, and other related areas of IPP have been submitted to the IETF. The IPP model and semantics, and the protocol, RFC 2911 and RFC 2910, respectively, have been released as proposed standards by the IETF. More information about the IPP group and specific technical details are available over the Internet on the PWG Web site: http HTTP in full HyperText Transfer Protocol Standard application-level protocol used for exchanging files on the World Wide Web. HTTP runs on top of the TCP/IP protocol. ://www.pwg.org/ipp About the PWG The Printer Working Group is a program of the IEEE-ISTO consisting of representatives from printer manufacturers, print server developers, operating system providers, and print management application developers. The PWG is chartered to make printers and the applications and operating systems supporting them work together better. The PWG is open to any company or individual interested in developing these new printing standards. The group meets regularly in person and via telephone conference calls. The next formal meeting of the IPP Working Group at a PWG meeting will be held in San Diego, California “San Diego” redirects here. For other uses, see San Diego (disambiguation). San Diego is a coastal Southern California city located in the southwestern corner of the continental United States. As of 2006, the city has a population of 1,256,951. , in early December 2000. |
|
||||||||||||

Printer friendly
Cite/link
Email
Feedback
Reader Opinion