PROTOTYPE PILOTLESS AIRCRAFT CRASHES DURING 2ND FLIGHT.Byline: Jim Skeen Daily News Staff Writer A prototype pilotless reconnaissance aircraft called DarkStar was destroyed Monday when it crashed shortly after takeoff. The crash occurred at 11:22 a.m., less than 10 seconds into what was to be its second test flight. Other than the aircraft than was no property damage and there were no injuries on the ground, Defense Department officials said. ``We don't know Don't know (DK, DKed) "Don't know the trade." A Street expression used whenever one party lacks knowledge of a trade or receives conflicting instructions from the other party. what caused it,'' said Defense Department spokesman Glenn Flood. ``We're in the process of setting up a team to investigate it.'' Wide, flat and tailless, with a 69-foot wing span and a blunt fuselage only 15 feet long by 5 feet high, the 8,600-pound DarkStar was powered by an engine similar to the one used in the Cessna Citation The Cessna Citation is a marketing name used by Cessna for its lines of business jets. Rather than one particular model of aircraft, the name applies to several "families" of turbofan-powered aircraft which have been produced over the years. business jet and capable of propelling the aircraft to altitudes above 45,000 feet. DarkStar was designed to fly pre-programmed flights, conducting its entire mission under computer control without additional commands from the ground. However, it was flying under the guidance of controllers on the ground when it crashed, officials said. Delayed five months by development problems, DarkStar first flew March 29. The aircraft flew for 20 minutes, reaching an altitude of 2,700 feet and a top speed of about 140 mph. DarkStar was developed under a $124 million contracts, covering the development and production of two aircraft. The program is being funded by the Defense Airborne Reconnaissance Office and the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA), U.S. government agency administered by the Department of Defense (see Defense, United States Department of). . DarkStar was designed to be a stealthy stealth·y adj. stealth·i·er, stealth·i·est Marked by or acting with quiet, caution, and secrecy intended to avoid notice. See Synonyms at secret. , high-altitude aircraft able to linger over Verb 1. linger over - delay dwell on hesitate, waffle, waver - pause or hold back in uncertainty or unwillingness; "Authorities hesitate to quote exact figures" a battlefield for more than eight hours and cover more than 14,000 square miles. The aircraft was intended to provide video and other information day or night to battlefield commanders. DarkStar was intended to be an economical reconnaissance aircraft, costing under $2,000 an hour to fly, compared to more than $30,000 an hour to fly a SR-71 Blackbird “SR-71” redirects here. For other uses, see SR-71 (disambiguation). The Lockheed SR-71 was an advanced, long-range, Mach 3 strategic reconnaissance aircraft developed from the Lockheed YF-12A and A-12 aircraft by the Lockheed Skunk Works. and $6,000 an hour to operate a U-2 spy plane. The aircraft was half built in Seattle and half by the Lockheed Martin For the former company, see . Lockheed Martin (NYSE: LMT) is a leading multinational aerospace manufacturer and advanced technology company formed in 1995 by the merger of Lockheed Corporation with Martin Marietta. ``Skunk skunk, name for several related New World mammals of the weasel family, characterized by their conspicuous black and white markings and use of a strong, highly offensive odor for defense. Works'' in Palmdale. Boeing Defense and Space Group built the aircraft's wing and is responsible for the avionics integration and the autonomous flight system. Skunk Works built the aircraft's fuselage and other systems. Final assembly was performed in Palmdale. CAPTION(S): Photo Photo: (ran in AV edition only--color) Wide, flat and taill ess, the DarkStar is powered by an engine similar to one used in a Cessna Citation business jet. |
|
||||||||||||

Printer friendly
Cite/link
Email
Feedback
Reader Opinion