Printer Friendly

PROSECUTORS WON'T RETRY MAN IN REPRESSED-MEMORY CASE.

Byline: Associated Press

A man convicted of a 20-year-old murder based on the repressed-memory testimony of his daughter will not be retried, prosecutors announced Tuesday.

San Mateo County prosecutors had planned to retry George Franklin Sr. after his conviction was overturned by federal courts. But disclosures since the trial have virtually ruled out testimony by Franklin's daughter, a former Canoga Park resident.

Eileen Franklin's sister testified last month that both sisters had been hypnotized by a therapist before the trial. That claim, if true, would bar Eileen's testimony under state law.

District Attorney James Fox also said recent DNA tests had cleared George Franklin of a second murder that Eileen had accused him of committing.

``It just creates a case where we don't believe we're going to be able to meet our burden of proof,'' the district attorney said.

Defense lawyer Douglas Horngrad said he was surprised by the announcement but believed it should have been made earlier.

``I'm relieved that George is going to be released from custody for a crime he didn't commit, but I'm disappointed that the system failed,'' Horngrad told the San Mateo County Times from Idaho, where he was vacationing.

Franklin is scheduled to be released today after prosecutors formally ask a judge to dismiss the charges.

Franklin, 57, a retired firefighter, was convicted in 1990 and sentenced to life in prison for the 1969 murder of 8-year-old Susan Nason.

The murder went unsolved for 20 years. In 1989, Eileen Franklin told police she had been looking into the eyes of her own young daughter and suddenly remembered seeing her father raise a rock over her playmate's head.

Eileen became the chief prosecution witness against her father, the first person known to be convicted based on repressed-memory testimony.
COPYRIGHT 1996 Daily News
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 1996, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Publication:Daily News (Los Angeles, CA)
Date:Jul 3, 1996
Words:293
Previous Article:STUDY FINDS MANY TROUBLED KIDS, ADULTS PRACTICE UNSAFE SEX.
Next Article:DODGERS BACK IN 1ST : DODGERS 7, PADRES 2.


Related Articles
Judicial debate over repressed memory syndrome continues.
2 ACQUITTED IN EXTORTION CASE.
JURY SPLIT ON BOYZ SENTENCES; PROSECUTORS MAY RETRY PENALTY PHASE.
MAN GIVEN LIFE FOR SLAYING; DEFENDANT SUPPLIED GUN, DROVE VEHICLE.
FEDS TO RETRY BUSINESS THREAT CASE; DEFENSE CLAIMS GOVERNMENT IS RACIALLY BIASED.
KILLER'S TRIAL ENDS AS JURORS DEADLOCK OVER PENALTY.
JURY CONVICTS THREE IN KILLING OF GIRL AFTER FAMILY DROVE DOWN WRONG ALLEY.
JUDGE DECLARES MISTRIAL; JURY DEADLOCKS 11-1 ON ROBBERIES.
KILLER OF ACCUSED MOLESTER SET FREE.
NEW TRIAL REJECTED IN '00 MURDER SUSPECT GETS PRISON ANYWAY.

Terms of use | Copyright © 2014 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters