PRODUCERS STILL PREFER PRINT, GALLUP STUDY SHOWS.Producers still prefer farm publications when it comes to ag information. Meetings or seminars and farm shows run a fairly distant second and third place. These are some of the findings of the "Trends in Agriculture 2000" survey of producers conducted by the Gallup Gallup, town (1990 pop. 19,154), alt. 6,515 ft (1,986 m), seat of McKinley co., NW N.Mex., on the Puerco River near the Ariz. line; inc. 1891. It is a rail and trade center in a large mining, timber, and ranching area. Located in a region populated by the Navajo, Zuñi, and Hopi, its economy is based upon local trade. The city's principal employer is the U.S. Bureau of Indian Affairs. Organization last July and August. "Producers were asked about their general attitudes toward farming today and about where they get information on agriculture and for making purchases," says Debra Christenson, managing consultant for Gallup. "We also wanted to know what producers thought about emerging agricultural technologies, as well as the industries that provide them with products and services." Gallup interviewed a sample of 1,218 large farmers and ranchers randomly selected from agricultural publication lists representative of the industry. "We intentionally surveyed a sample of large producers because they represent the bulk of food and fiber production in the United States," Christenson says. The study was conducted for the Association of Leading Ag Media Companies (formerly the Agricultural Publishers Association) and co-sponsored by the W.K. Kellogg Foundation Kellogg Foundation, philanthropic institution established (1930) at Battle Creek, Mich., by food manufacturer W. K. Kellogg (1860–1951). Kellogg eventually gave the institution a total of $47 million, and by 1990 its endowment had increased to more than $3.5 billion. After World War II the foundation broadened its interests, formerly restricted to Michigan, to include support of agricultural, health, and education projects throughout the world, with an with assistance from the Alpha Zeta Foundation. Complete details of the study can be obtained at www.agmedia.org, or by calling 314/576-7957. PRAISE FOR PRINT In telephone interviews, producers were asked to rate the impact of various information sources on a 5-point scale, with "5" meaning a major source and "1" meaning not a source at all. Sixty-five percent of the producers responding gave farm publications a "4" or "5" rating. The study asked producers to rate eight information sources. In rank order, respondents gave a "4" or "5" rating to these information sources: farm publications, meetings and seminars, farm shows, direct mail, electronic information (DTN), farm radio, Internet and television. The results are similar to those of a baseline "Trends in Agriculture" study conducted in 1998 by Gallup. In that survey, producers ranked information sources in about the same way. They named farm publications as their dominant source of ag information. But in the 2000 study, direct mail dropped from second to fourth place and the Internet moved up one notch ahead of television. In the most recent study, women (73 percent) and those with high school or higher education (69 percent) rank farm publications higher than do men (63 percent) and those without a high school degree (60 percent). Gallup divided the analysis of the survey results into two segments -- one for crop producers and one for livestock producers. Within the crop producer segment, wheat/hay producers (67 percent) rate the impact of farm publications significantly higher than do most other crop producers. Within the livestock segment, beef producers (64 percent) and dairy farmers (70 percent) rank farm publications significantly higher than do hog producers (51 percent). INTERNET HABITS Producers also were questioned about their use of computers and the Internet. Farm use of computers is high (69 percent), but the number of farmers and ranchers using the Internet is significantly below figures for the general public (41 percent vs. 63 percent). Only 25 percent of farmers and ranchers have shopped online during the last six months. "Shopping on the Internet is not cutting deeply into traditional purchasing relationships," Christenson says. "Known and trusted brands are attractive when the Internet is used, with 59 percent saying that brands are important to Internet purchases." PARTICIPANT PICTURE According to respondent demographics, the producers interviewed for the 2000 Gallup study looked about the same as the producers in the 1998 study. Of the sample, 94 percent were owner-producers; 44 percent produced crops and animals; 36 percent crops only; and 19 percent animals only. Of the respondents, 78 percent were male and the mean average age was 51. Ninety percent of the respondents had at least a high school education; 24 percent had college degrees. The mean household income from farming and ranching for the sample (before taxes) was $69,810. Christenson points out that the study showed 62 percent of the producers totally, very or somewhat negative about agriculture. "But while there's a drop in mood since the 1998 survey, many large producers continue to report that their farming and ranching operations are increasing in size," she concludes.
IMPACT OF INFORMATION SOURCES
Producers were asked to rate the impact of information sources on a
5-point scale, with "5" meaning a major source and "1" meaning not a
source at all. Results of the "4" and "5" ratings are shown in rank
order. For example, 65 percent of producers give farm publications a
"4" or "5" rating.
Farm Meetings/ Farm Direct
Publications Seminars Shows Mail
All producers 65% 42% 40% 23%
Corn/Beans/Cotton 61 43 44 22
Wheat/Hay 67 42 40 25
Beef 64 36 39 23
Dairy 70 42 41 25
Hogs 51 43 39 21
Electronic Farm
Info (DTN) Radio Internet TV
All producers 21% 20% 18% 11%
Corn/Beans/Cotton 33 24 17 12
Wheat/Hay 18 22 20 11
Beef 22 28 20 11
Dairy 9 17 16 10
Hogs 32 18 16 11
Debby Hartke is a St. Louis-based writer and communications consultant. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||

Printer friendly
Cite/link
Email
Feedback
Reader Opinion