PPI - OFT Consults On Market Reference To The CC & FSA Reports On Thematic Work.For background please see previous law-now articles Criticism of the payment protection insurance Payment Protection Insurance (PPI) is a type of insurance that provides an income to maintain a borrower’s debt repayments in the event of an accident or sickness that prevents them from working, or unemployment. market, FSA FSA Financial Services Authority FSA Food Standards Agency (UK) FSA Farm Service Agency (USDA) FSA Financial Services Agency (Japan) update on payment protection insurance, OFT announces market study into payment protection insurance and FSA and payment protection insurance - the latest. On 19 October 2006 the Office of Fair Trading The Office of Fair Trading or OFT is a non-ministerial government department of the United Kingdom, established by the Fair Trading Act 1973, which enforces both consumer protection and competition law, acting as the UK's economic regulator. announced that it intends to refer the payment protection insurance market to the Competition Commission for a full-scale review of the market and how it functions. The OFT is consulting on its intention to refer until 30 November 2006, so if you want to make any comments, you should act promptly. The key issue is whether to include PPI (1) (Pixels Per Inch) The measurement of the resolution of a monitor or scanner. For example, a monitor that is 16 inches wide and displays 1600 pixels across its width would have a resolution of 100 ppi (1600 divided by 16). on store cards within the reference (the Competition Commission having already investigated the store card sector). The other sectors - PPI on mortgages, credit cards, unsecured loans Unsecured Loan A loan that is issued and supported only by the borrower's creditworthiness, rather than by some sort of collateral. Notes: Generally, a borrower must have a high credit rating to receive an unsecured loan. (personal loans, motor loans and hire purchase) and secured loans - are all to be included. The OFT has set out a number of reasons why it believes the PPI market should be reviewed by the CC. These are very similar to its "emerging issues", which were discussed with the insurance industry at a feedback session in August this year. The reasons focus on the following issues: consumers' understanding of PPI, how they purchase their PPI and the quality of information available to them, which the OFT believe hinders competition; competitive pressure at the supplier level does not in the OFT's view appear to be feeding down to consumers; claims ratios for PPI are low compared to other insurance products and costs do not seem to be high. The OFT's emerging issues paper raised concerns that PPI providers could be making very high profits, whilst customers were receiving poor value. It also believes that high commission rates for PPI compared to other products reinforce this conclusion. The OFT particularly noted in its announcement that the point of sale advantage enjoyed by distributors hinders competition at the key point at which the consumer buys the insurance. It also believes that stand-alone providers have difficulty entering into the PPI market. Any CC reference made in this case could last up to two years and could result in the CC imposing new rules on the sector. FSA report The OFT has been liaising closely with the Financial Services Authority The Financial Services Authority ("FSA") is an independent non-departmental public body and quasi-judicial body that regulates the financial services industry in the United Kingdom. Its main office is based in Canary Wharf, London, with another office in Edinburgh. in this area and the FSA published on 19 October 2006 'The Sale of Payment Protection Insurance - results of follow-up thematic work'. The report acknowledges that a number of firms have taken steps over the past year to improve PPI sale standards. However, there remains three key areas of widespread concern: Many firms are still not giving customers clear information during the sales conversation: some are not making it clear that PPI is optional and customers are not receiving full information about how much the cover costs. Customers are still not being made fully aware that there may be parts of the policy under which they cannot claim. Furthermore, some firms are still failing to establish that the PPI policies they recommend are suitable because they are not collecting sufficient information from the customer - for example, about any existing cover they possess. Where customers are sold single premium policies, this is not always done with the best interests of the customer in mind - for example, where a choice between regular and single premium is available, the sales conversation may be biased towards a single premium policy when the customer's circumstances suggest this is not suitable. FSA have found that firms that do not have financial services The examples and perspective in this article or section may not represent a worldwide view of the subject. Please [ improve this article] or discuss the issue on the talk page. as their main line of business and sell PPI as a tertiary product have generally poor compliance. However, the FSA are not merely concentrating on such firms. The FSA warn that due to the continuing problems with the sale of PPI as evidenced by the work the FSA and OFT have undertaken, further regulation of the PPI market may be prescribed pre·scribe v. pre·scribed, pre·scrib·ing, pre·scribes v.tr. 1. To set down as a rule or guide; enjoin. See Synonyms at dictate. 2. To order the use of (a medicine or other treatment). . If such regulation is to be prescribed, it will emerge in the review of ICOB ICOB Insurance Conduct of Business rules (publication) sourcebook - timetabled to be consulted upon in the first quarter of 2007. The OFT's announcement is available here and its PPI report is available here. For the FSA announcement, please click here. For the FSA's PPI report, please click here. This article was written for Law-Now, CMS (1) See content management system and color management system. (2) (Conversational Monitor System) Software that provides interactive communications for IBM's VM operating system. Cameron McKenna's free online information service. To register for Law-Now, please go to www.law-now.com/law-now/mondaq Law-Now information is for general purposes and guidance only. The information and opinions expressed in all Law-Now articles are not necessarily comprehensive and do not purport To convey, imply, or profess; to have an appearance or effect. The purport of an instrument generally refers to its facial appearance or import, as distinguished from the tenor of an instrument, which means an exact copy or duplicate. PURPORT, pleading. to give professional or legal advice. All Law-Now information relates to circumstances prevailing at the date of its original publication and may not have been updated to reflect subsequent developments. The original publication date for this article was 20/10/2006. Mr Nick Paul CMS Cameron McKenna CMS Cameron McKenna LLP (sometimes referred to as Camerons or, internally, CMCK) is an international law firm with over 130 partners and offices throughout the United Kingdom and Central and Eastern Europe, with branch offices in Bristol (established in LLP LLP - Lower Layer Protocol Mitre House 160 Aldersgate Street London EC1A 4DD UNITED KINGDOM Tel: 207367 2106 Fax: 207367 2446 E-mail: helen.williams@cms-cmck.com URL URL in full Uniform Resource Locator Address of a resource on the Internet. The resource can be any type of file stored on a server, such as a Web page, a text file, a graphics file, or an application program. : www.law-now.com Click Here for related articles (c) Mondaq Ltd, 2006 - Tel. +44 (0)20 8544 8300 - http://www.mondaq.com |
|
||||||||||||||||||

Printer friendly
Cite/link
Email
Feedback
Reader Opinion