Printer Friendly
The Free Library
14,495,914 articles and books
Member login
User name  
Password 
 
Join us Forgot password?

PNAC's plans.


John F. McManus' article "Debunking de·bunk  
tr.v. de·bunked, de·bunk·ing, de·bunks
To expose or ridicule the falseness, sham, or exaggerated claims of: debunk a supposed miracle drug.
 Bush's Reason for War" in the October 16 issue was right on, except for a very important part that he left out about PNAC PNAC Project for the New American Century
PNAC Pakistan National Accreditation Council
PNAC Pontifical North American College
PNAC Port-Based Network Access Control (IEEE 802.1x)
PNAC Pilot Not At Controls
PNAC Provident National Assurance Company
 (The Project for The New American Century The Project for the New American Century (PNAC) is an American neoconservative think tank based in Washington, D.C., co-founded as "a non-profit educational organization" by William Kristol and Robert Kagan in early 1997. ) and their September 2000 document Rebuilding America's Defense. That document provides another very key piece of evidence as to what the neo-conservatives future plans were with regard to our nation as well as the war in Iraq.

On pages 50-51 of that document, on a page entitled "Creating Tomorrow's Dominant Force," Cheney, Rumsfeld, Kristol, Jeb Bush John Ellis "Jeb" Bush (born February 11, 1953) is an American politician, and was the 43rd Governor of Florida as well as the first Republican to be re-elected to that office. He is a prominent member of the Bush family: the younger brother of current President George W. , et al., speak about their desire to "preserve America's military pre-eminence in the coming decades." They also say "the Department of Defense must move more aggressively to experiment with new technologies and operation concepts." Then in a very telling statement they give an ominous warning: "the process of transformation [to modernize the military and to become more dominant in the world], even if it brings revolutionary change, is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event like a new Pearl Harbor Pearl Harbor, land-locked harbor, on the southern coast of Oahu island, Hawaii, W of Honolulu; one of the largest and best natural harbors in the E Pacific Ocean. In the vicinity are many U.S. military installations, including the chief U.S. . Domestic politics [hint: the need to "protect" Americans] and industrial policy [hint: give more corporate welfare, i.e., Halliburton] will shape the pace and content of the transformation as much as the requirements of current missions."

Conveniently, one year later, they got their "new Pearl Harbor" on 9/11. Imagine that! This group of powerful policy directors, which happened to make up the new presidential administration, got exactly what they needed to put their plan into play. The plan of taking control of society and the world, having an excuse to start a perpetual "War on Terror This article is about U.S. actions, and those of other states, after September 11, 2001. For other conflicts, see Terrorism.

The War on Terror (also known as the War on Terrorism
," starting the doctrine of pre-emptive pre·emp·tive or pre-emp·tive  
adj.
1. Of, relating to, or characteristic of preemption.

2. Having or granted by the right of preemption.

3.
a.
 war which would include Iraq and eventually Iran, and dismantling the Constitution and Bill of Rights through the Patriot Act and the Military Commissions Act--not to mention focusing on modernizing our military--just a coincidence? I think not!

MARK HUDSON

Syracuse, Utah
COPYRIGHT 2006 American Opinion Publishing, Inc.
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2006, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:LETTERS TO THE EDITOR
Author:Hudson, Mark
Publication:The New American
Article Type:Letter to the editor
Date:Dec 11, 2006
Words:320
Previous Article:Sovereignty-destroying agenda.(LETTERS TO THE EDITOR)(Letter to the editor)
Next Article:Unconstitutional delegation of authority.(LETTERS TO THE EDITOR)(Letter to the editor)



Related Articles
Another CFR-UN war: Paul O'Neill's revelations in Ron Suskind's book The Price of Loyalty do not tell the whole story of why the Bush administration...
Behind the presidency: admire him or despise him, George W. Bush is essentially a figurehead for the tightly knit establishment oligarchy that...
LETTERS IN THE EDITOR'S MAILBAG.(Letters)(Letter to the Editor)
A walk in the Northwoods: an astonishing proposal created by the Pentagon four decades ago illustrates our government's capacity for large-scale...
Debunking Bush's reason for war.(THE LAST WORD)(Senate Intelligence Committee releases report on Iraqi war, Georeg W. Bush)(Report)
Realism, indignation, and American foreign policy: a radical and a neoconservative change their political stripes.

Terms of use | Copyright © 2009 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters | Submit articles