Printer Friendly
The Free Library
4,546,918 articles and books
Member login
User name  
Password 
 
Join us Forgot password?

PARENTS OPPOSE CELL TOWER NEAR SCHOOL.


Byline: Jason Kandel Staff Writer

NORTHRIDGE - More than 100 angry parents lambasted city officials and phone executives Monday for proposing to install a 60-foot cell tower across the street from the Balboa Gifted Magnet School.

Officials want to build the towers at the site, near 17020 Labrador St., to improve cell phone service in that area.

But the parents are worried about effects on their children.

``As parents of students here, we are concerned about the health effects,'' said parent Suzanne Waisbren-Rader, who has two daughters, 7 and 10, who attend the school. ``If there is any chance at all that kids can be harmed, why take the chance?''

Los Angeles Unified School District officials, representatives from Pacific Bell, AirTouch Cellular and technical experts met to explain the long-term effects of radio waves produced by the towers.

Dr. Jerrold Bushberg, a radiology expert from the University of California, Davis, Medical Center, representing the phone companies, tried to appease the audience by explaining the low possibilities of exposure to radio waves.

``Even the most conservative scientist would permit a site like this,'' he said. ``We're all exposed to radiation from the ground to the air.''

He did say that little research is available to pinpoint the effects on people from long-term exposure to radiation.

The meeting Monday stemmed from an earlier hearing by zoning officials about the towers.

Many parents and neighbors appeared at that hearing and convinced the city's Zoning Administration to forestall the project for four weeks, to allow the parties to resolve the issue informally. Parents are also collecting signatures for a petition.

And as a result of the outcry, school board member Julie Korenstein voiced her opposition to the project Monday night.

``I believe that until the potential health effects of radio-frequency radiation and electromagnetic fields are more fully defined, and appropriate regulatory standards are adopted, it is prudent to ensure against any future placement of such facilities on or adjacent to school property,'' she wrote in a letter to the zoning administration.

COPYRIGHT 2000 Daily News
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2000, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Publication:Daily News (Los Angeles, CA)
Date:May 2, 2000
Words:336
Previous Article:AVENGERS REMAIN WINLESS BUT THE PLAYERS SAY THEY'RE NOT FAR OFF OKLAHOMA 59, AVENGERS 33.(Sports)
Next Article:AUTHOR AIDS HIS MENTOR.(News)



Related Articles
Dobson Magazine Attacks PTA As Liberal Front Group.(Brief Article)
Tower power.(Business)(Proliferation of cellular-phone antennae intensifies debate over radio frequency radiation)
School districts differ on wireless tower siting policies.(Business)
City says no to cell tower near UO.(Utilities)(Telecommunications: Eugene planners deny Sprint's bid for a tower at Williams Bakery.)
BRIEFLY COLLEGE TO DISPLAY ILLUSTRATOR'S WORK.(News)
STEALTH CELLS PLACEMENT OF WIRELESS TOWERS CREATING HANG-UPS FOR RESIDENTS.(News)(Statistical Data Included)
PACOIMA ELEMENTARY CONSIDERS NAME CHANGE.(News)
CELL PHONE TOWER UPSETS PARENTS; PLACEMENT AT HOLY REDEEMER SCHOOL ELICITS RADIATION CONCERN.(NEWS)
Cell tower proposed near Hayward Field.(Higher Education)(Telecommunications: The University of Oregon and the city would have to agree to the...
LETTERS IN THE EDITOR'S MAILBAG.(Letters)(Letter to the Editor)

Terms of use | Copyright © 2008 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters | Submit articles