Printer Friendly
The Free Library
14,787,283 articles and books
Member login
User name  
Password 
 
Join us Forgot password?

Owner can claim capital improvements with court ruling.


A Long Island law firm is hailing a recent court decision that will allow an owner to claim a $300,000 repiping job as a major capital improvement despite a two-year delay in completing the job.

The court ruled that the delay was the result of circumstances CIRCUMSTANCES, evidence. The particulars which accompany a fact.
     2. The facts proved are either possible or impossible, ordinary and probable, or extraordinary and improbable, recent or ancient; they may have happened near us, or afar off; they are public or
 out of the owner's control and, therefore, is not indicative of the owner's intention to abandon the project. Under state Rent Stabilization Stabilization

The action undertakes a country when it buys and sells its own currency to protect its exchange value.
Actions registered competitive traders undertake by on the NYSE to meet the exchange requirement that 75% of their traded be stabilizing, meaning that sell orders
 Code, owners are only permitted to claim work as major capital improvements only if they are completed in a timely fashion and done as part of a unified plan to improve the building.

Under the law, owners can make adjustments to regulated rent on the basis of major capital improvements.

The decision, made by the first department of the Supreme Court, Appellate Division In several jurisdictions, the Appellate Division is the name of a court, or division of a court, that hears appeals from lower courts.
  • For the Appellate Division of the New York State Supreme Court, see New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division.
, reversed a lower court decision. The owner was represented by attorneys Karen Karen

Any member of a variety of tribal peoples of southern Myanmar (Burma). Constituting the second largest minority in Myanmar, the Karen are not a unitary group in any ethnic sense, as they differ among themselves linguistically, religiously, and economically.
 Schwartz-Sidrane, and Sherrie Taylor of the Hewlett law firm of Pennisi Daniels & Norelli, LLP LLP - Lower Layer Protocol . The case involved a building owner that hired a contractor to perform the repiping job but did not complete it due to problems with a subcontractor One who takes a portion of a contract from the principal contractor or from another subcontractor.

When an individual or a company is involved in a large-scale project, a contractor is often hired to see that the work is done.
. A new contractor was hired several years later and the job was completed.

Sidane said the decision is important because owners routinely face unforeseen delays with capital improvements for a variety of reasons, such as a contractor's failure to complete the job.

"The job took longer than anybody wanted but that doesn't mean he should be denied his increase, Sidane said.
COPYRIGHT 2002 Hagedorn Publication
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2002, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Author:Keith, Natalie
Publication:Real Estate Weekly
Article Type:Brief Article
Geographic Code:1USA
Date:May 8, 2002
Words:245
Previous Article:Largest TriBeCa land deal to result in residential development on 500,000 SF.(Brief Article)
Next Article:Century 21 restored after Sept. 11.(Brief Article)
Topics:



Related Articles
Ruling on bankruptcy financing cheered. (shareholders of single-property corporation under Chapter 11 protection allowed to make loan to corporation...
Deductibility of asbestos removal costs. (analysis of tax treatment of asbestos removal costs)
No succession to loft tenancy. (New York City Loft Board makes ruling on family succession regulations relating to rent control of New York, New York...
Loft Board rejects fixed fixture prices. (New York City Loft Board ruling)
Loft Board rejects fixed fixture fees. (New York City Loft Board)
Property improvements go with land. (Focus on Management & Maintenance)
Attorneys under attack over three-day notices.
Real-estate agency owners win liability protection in Supreme Court.(Meyer v. Holley)
Lenders beware--claimants and sureties take notice.(Inside Construction)
Successful property maintenance from head to toe.

Terms of use | Copyright © 2010 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters | Submit articles