Ottawa gives in on same-sex benefits.Focus on the Family, July/August 1998, reports the following: Ottawa--Thanks to inaction by the federal government, the push for homosexual rights in Canada has taken a major--and possibly decisive--step forward. On June 22, the government let pass the 60-day deadline for appealing to the Supreme Court of Canada The Supreme Court of Canada (French: Cour suprême du Canada) is the highest court of Canada and is the final court of appeal in the Canadian justice system.[1] the Rosenberg decision of the Ontario Court of Appeal The Court of Appeal for Ontario (frequently referred to as Ontario Court of Appeal) is headquartered in downtown Toronto, in historic Osgoode Hall. The Court is composed of 22 judges who hear over 1 500 appeals each year, on issues of private law, constitutional . That unanimous ruling not only threw out as discriminatory the opposite-sex definition of "spouse" in the federal Income Tax Act; it also ordered that a new definition embracing same-sex partners be immediately "read in" to the Act. By deciding not to appeal, the government appeared to be signalling that it had given up the legal fight to preserve the traditional definition of "spouse." Stated Justice Minister Anne McLellan
A. , "It was decided that an appeal would not have merit" (Canadian Press Please help [ rewrite this article] from a neutral point of view. Mark blatant advertising for , using . , June 22). The decision was immediately hailed by gay activists. "We feel very much that the stage is now set, certainly for a redrafting of the Income Tax Act, and a reconsideration of other federal laws to create a regime where gays and lesbians are treated equally in federal law," said John Fisher
Saint John Fisher also John Cardinal Fisher (c. 1469 – 1535), was an English Catholic bishop, cardinal and martyr. of Equality for Gays and Lesbians Everywhere (Toronto Star, June 23). Officially, the government seems in no hurry to rewrite the laws pertaining to "spouse." "We're dealing only with . . . one specific area of the Income Tax Act," said McLellan. "If in fact there are future decisions of courts in this country that implicate im·pli·cate tr.v. im·pli·cat·ed, im·pli·cat·ing, im·pli·cates 1. To involve or connect intimately or incriminatingly: evidence that implicates others in the plot. 2. other federal legislation, we will deal with them when they come out" (CP, June 22). Comment This latest development is the fulfilling of the prophecies made two years ago, at the time when then Minister of Justice Allan Rock added "sexual orientation sexual orientation n. The direction of one's sexual interest toward members of the same, opposite, or both sexes, especially a direction seen to be dictated by physiologic rather than sociologic forces. " to the Canada Human Rights Act (May 1996). There will be much more to come unless voters decide they have had enough of the Chretien Liberals and turf them out of office. |
|
||||||||||||||

Printer friendly
Cite/link
Email
Feedback
Reader Opinion