Printer Friendly
The Free Library
22,741,889 articles and books

Organizational commitment, human resource practices, and organizational characteristics.

Organizational commitment persists as a primary variable of interest in studies of employment, organizations, and allied fields. The Article-First database reveals 202 article and abstract titles referencing "organizational commitment" in scholarly sources published between 2001 and 2004, and organizational commitment remains a perennial topic for management scholars (e.g., Hammer and Avgar, 2005; Jandeska and Kraimer, 2005; Payne and Huffman, 2005). Commitment has been studied by many because it is believed to affect organizational performance. For example, a primary aspect of organizational commitment is extra-role behavior. Organizations generally value the initiative and conscientiousness that such contributions represent. Although organizations appreciate individual performance that goes beyond job requirements, few would argue that job descriptions can adequately specify all valued contributions.

Numerous studies have shown that organizational commitment predicts important variables, including absenteeism, organizational citizenship, performance, and turnover (e.g., Mathieu and Zajac, 1990; Morrow, 1993; Wright and Bonett, 2002). Colbert and Kwon (2000) noted that organizational commitment has been related inversely to both intent to search for job alternatives and intent to leave one's job (also see Quarles, 1994). Also, it reduces absence frequency (Farrell and Stamm, 1988). In addition, organizational commitment has been related to more positive organizational outcomes, including job satisfaction (Williams and Hazer, 1986) and attendance motivation (Burton et al., 2002). These studies underscore The underscore character (_) is often used to make file, field and variable names more readable when blank spaces are not allowed. For example, NOVEL_1A.DOC, FIRST_NAME and Start_Routine.

(character) underscore - _, ASCII 95.
 organizational commitment's importance and thus the need to understand better its antecedents.

Many firms have moved rapidly from Tayloristic work systems, in which employees exercise limited discretion within narrow job descriptions, toward High Commitment Work Systems (HCWSs) that require considerable discretion, initiative, and judgment under reduced supervision (Osterman, 1994, 1995). Lincoln and Kalleberg (1985) described a similar earlier trend inspired by the apparent success of Japanese-style management. These trends have spurred increased interest in organizational commitment, and will likely enhance its importance in coming years (Osterman, 1995). Still, many issues concerning organizational commitment remain poorly understood (Price, 1990). For example, scholars contend that many organizations adopt Human Resources The fancy word for "people." The human resources department within an organization, years ago known as the "personnel department," manages the administrative aspects of the employees.  (HR) practices intended to maximize employee commitment (e.g., Guest, 1992), yet, with few exceptions (e.g., Ogilvie, 1986), little systematic research examines the influence of HR practices, including practices intended to promote commitment. Further, although prior work suggests that organizational structure influences commitment (Berger and Cummings, 1990), its effects have received only limited attention (see Lincoln and Kalleberg (1985) for a notable exception).

We examine effects of HR practices and organizational characteristics on commitment. Nearly all past studies rely on samples drawn from one (usually) or very few worksites (cf. Agarwala, 2003; Becker et al., 1996; Caldwell et al., 1990; Eaton, 2003). This severely restricts inferences on factors that tend to be constant within organizations, but vary across organizations, notably HR practices and organizational structures. The National Organizations Survey (NOS) used a hyper-sampling strategy to develop a nationally representative sample of employees and workplaces (Kalleberg et al., 1996). It provides matched employee-employer surveys, including employer responses on HR practices and organizational characteristics. In addition to providing meaningful variance on HR practices, this helps overcome common method variance and causal inference problems that plague single-source studies.

Our study provides two major contributions. First, we test hypothesized relationships that have received little attention in past studies. Specifically, we examine the influence of HR practices and organizational structure on organizational commitment. Second, our study uses a diverse national probability sample of U.S. workers and their employers, providing greater generality gen·er·al·i·ty  
n. pl. gen·er·al·i·ties
1. The state or quality of being general.

2. An observation or principle having general application; a generalization.

 than prior studies.

In the following section, we discuss theoretical foundations of organizational commitment, and present hypotheses for its relationships with various HR practices and organizational characteristics. Next, data, measures, and methods are discussed. Then, results are presented. Finally, we conclude with a discussion section addressing limitations, contributions of our study, and future research.


Organizational commitment is an individual attitude that reflects one's identification with and involvement in a particular organization (e.g., Mowday et al., 1979). It can be characterized by three related factors: 1) strong belief in the organization's goals and values, 2) willingness to exert extra effort on its behalf, and 3) strong desire to maintain membership. The extant literature Extant literature refers to texts that have survived from the past to the present time. Extant literature can be divided into extant original manuscripts, copies of original manuscripts, quotations and paraphrases of passages of non-extant texts contained in other works,  has included important debates, or alternative perspectives, on several important issues, including the focus and conceptualization con·cep·tu·al·ize  
v. con·cep·tu·al·ized, con·cep·tu·al·iz·ing, con·cep·tu·al·iz·es
To form a concept or concepts of, and especially to interpret in a conceptual way:
 of organizational commitment. Various foci of employee commitment are possible. These include commitments to one's employer, profession, immediate supervisor, and union (Morrow, 1993). Our concern is with commitment to the employer. This aligns with our emphasis on organizational-level variables (i.e., HR practices, organizational characteristics) rather than supervisor or coworker co·work·er or co-work·er  
One who works with another; a fellow worker.
 attributes. Also, we emphasize a "global" or unidimensional conception of organizational commitment rather than a faceted approach. Commitment facets are sufficiently correlated such that one may speak meaningfully of overall (unidimensional) commitment (Morrow, 1993), and thus focus on it as a useful concept, even though it may be useful for some purposes to examine its facets in greater detail.

Organizational Commitment

Critics have argued that research on organizational commitment lacks strong theoretical grounding (cf. Mathieu and Zajac, 1990; Morris and Sherman, 1981). At least three compatible theoretical streams apply. First, common to all social exchange theories is the notion that individuals seek favorable outcomes relative to their inputs (Cook et al., 1993). Consistent with social exchange theory, perceived organizational support (POS (1) See point of sale and packet over SONET.

(2) "Parent over shoulder." See digispeak.

POS - point of sale
) addresses the organization's commitment to its employees. Specifically, POS refers to the extent employees perceive that employers value employee contributions and care about their wellbeing (Eisenberger et al., 1986). Finally, psychological contract theory refers to the implicit, reciprocal rights and obligations that individuals perceive within exchange relations (Rousseau, 1995), and can also be used to understand commitment (Rousseau and Wade-Benzoni, 1995). Each perspective suggests that commitment is contingent on Adj. 1. contingent on - determined by conditions or circumstances that follow; "arms sales contingent on the approval of congress"
contingent upon, dependant on, dependant upon, dependent on, dependent upon, depending on, contingent
 perceived exchanges. More favorable exchanges should strengthen employee attraction to the employment relationship and increase commitment. In addition, all three theories allow for exchange of either instrumental or affective affective /af·fec·tive/ (ah-fek´tiv) pertaining to affect.

1. Concerned with or arousing feelings or emotions; emotional.

 outcomes. Finally, implicit or explicit within each theory is the notion that employees hold expectations of what employers should provide (e.g., comparison level (CL) standards or expectations, expectations of support, psychological contract expectations).

Meta-analyses (e.g., Matheiu and Zajac, 1990) and more qualitative reviews (e.g., Morrow, 1993) show that prior study of antecedents varies greatly. Mathieu and Zaiac (1990) were able to incorporate 41 prior estimates relating commitment and employee age, but only three on "organizational characteristics" (size and centralization cen·tral·ize  
v. cen·tral·ized, cen·tral·iz·ing, cen·tral·iz·es
1. To draw into or toward a center; consolidate.

). None of the antecedents examined could be termed a "human resource practice." This is both interesting and problematic, given that such practices are a principal means organizations use to influence commitment (Guest, 1992).

Variables such as age, gender, and tenure are often studied because they vary within a single site, are readily available, and are easy to measure. Prior studies typically focus on a single site where HR practice variation is limited or non-existent; thus, HR practices are not examined (Caldwell et al., 1990). Although a few studies have examined effects of specific HR practices (e.g., Agarwala, 2003; Bills, 1987; Bemmels, 1995; Eaton, 2003; Florkowski and Schuster, 1992; Lincoln and Kalleberg, 1985), HR measures tend to be unique and not comparable across studies. Tiffs makes the accumulation of findings difficult at best. Hence, little is known about the influence of HR practices and most organizational characteristics. Despite this, prior research provides a basis for predictions on effects of HR practices and organizational characteristics. Testing such predictions is needed to establish the empirical relationship In science, an empirical relationship is one based solely on observation rather than theory. An empirical relationship requires only confirmatory data irrespective of theoretical basis.  between HR practices and commitment (Meyer and Allen, 1997).

Human Resource Practices

Prior work (especially Delaney and Huselid, 1996) suggests distinct HR concepts that should influence commitment. Using that research as a foundation, the present study posits that internal labor markets, hiring selectivity selectivity /se·lec·tiv·i·ty/ (se-lek-tiv´i-te) in pharmacology, the degree to which a dose of a drug produces the desired effect in relation to adverse effects.


, training, grievance griev·ance  
a. An actual or supposed circumstance regarded as just cause for complaint.

b. A complaint or protestation based on such a circumstance. See Synonyms at injustice.

 resolution mechanisms, benefits, employee involvement, incentive pay, union pressure, compensation cuts, and downsizing (1) Converting mainframe and mini-based systems to client/server LANs.

(2) To reduce equipment and associated costs by switching to a less-expensive system.

(jargon) downsizing
 all affect organizational commitment.

Internal Labor Markets. An internal labor market According to Doeringer and Piore (1), internal labor markets are an administrative unit within a firm in which pricing and allocation of labor is governed by a set of administrative rules and procedures.  (ILM) exists when external hiring is limited to entrylevel positions, job "ladders" exist to advance internally, and promotion from within is favored (e.g., Althauser, 1989). Bills (1987) suggested that a primary motivation to establish and maintain ILMs is to secure employee commitment. Since ILMs favor current employees over external rivals, employees should perceive ILMs positively and reciprocate re·cip·ro·cate  
v. re·cip·ro·cat·ed, re·cip·ro·cat·ing, re·cip·ro·cates
1. To give or take mutually; interchange.

2. To show, feel, or give in response or return.

 this support with commitment (Eisenberger et al., 1986). Also, individuals may see ILMs fulfilling an employer's duty to provide security and opportunity for development and advancement. We expect employees appreciate their favored status in an ILM and, consequently, feel higher commitment.

H1: Internal labor market practices are positively related to organizational commitment.

Hiring Selectivity. Hiring selectivity refers to the rigor rigor /rig·or/ (rig´er) [L.] chill; rigidity.

rigor mor´tis  the stiffening of a dead body accompanying depletion of adenosine triphosphate in the muscle fibers.
 of hiring as indicated by applications per vacancy. Selective hiring may indicate numerous phenomena, including extreme care in matching applicants with job requirements or firm culture, an internal development strategy (i.e., selection for careers), and conscious effort to "skim the cream" of the labor market labor market A place where labor is exchanged for wages; an LM is defined by geography, education and technical expertise, occupation, licensure or certification requirements, and job experience  and offer higher compensation to dissuade TO DISSUADE, crim. law. To induce a person not to do an act.
     2. To dissuade a witness from giving evidence against a person indicted, is an indictable offence at common law. Hawk. B. 1, c. 2 1, s. 1 5.
 shirking Shirking

The tendency to do less work when the return is smaller. Owners may have more incentive to shirk if they issue equity as opposed to debt, because they retain less ownership interest in the company and therefore may receive a smaller return.
. Hiring selectivity and associated screening also may form a "rite of passage rite of passage
A ritual or ceremony signifying an event in a person's life indicative of a transition from one stage to another, as from adolescence to adulthood.
," an initiation rite that elicits increased attachment. Employees' awareness that the organization has incurred substantial costs in selection also may enhance their sense of valuation by the organization and their perceptions that it is committed to them (Eisenberger et al., 1990). The effect may be a felt obligation or voluntary desire (or both) by employees to repay" the organization for its investment through commitment. Further, based on attraction-selection-attrition (ASA Asa (ā`sə), in the Bible, king of Judah, son and successor of Abijah. He was a good king, zealous in his extirpation of idols. When Baasha of Israel took Ramah (a few miles N of Jerusalem), Asa bought the help of Benhadad of Damascus and ) theory (Schneider et al., 1995), rigorous selection systems should produce high person-organization fit, enhancing attachment. Finally, employee awareness of rigorous hiring may enhance personal competence perceptions, and meta-analytic evidence shows that perceived personal competence is strongly related to commitment (Matheiu and Zajac, 1990). This suggests that selectivity enhances employee commitment. Prior research supports this prediction (e.g., Caldwell et al., 1990).

H2: Hiring selectivity is positively related to organizational commitment.

Training. A strong training emphasis implies an internal labor market and career opportunities (Althauser, 1989). Such emphasis is indicated by formal training, numbers participating, training effectiveness, and firm attempts to match current training practices. Based on human capital theory, employees should perceive employer training investments as symbols of continued future employment and higher wages (e.g., Strober, 1990). Employees should value training for the security, advancement, and higher earnings implied, and thus be more committed. Prior research shows organizational climates that emphasize continuous training and updating elicit high commitment (e.g., Maurer and Tarulli, 1994).

H3: An emphasis on employee training is positively related to organizational commitment.

Grievance Resolution Mechanisms. Many firms have formal procedures for resolving worker disputes. These provide a mechanism to redress grievances, and promote "voice" over "exit." Such procedures encourage the view that the organization seeks fairness and is open to calls for change from below. Because this concern for due process and fairness signals the organization's support and its commitment to employee concerns, grievance mechanisms should increase employee commitment (Eisenberger et al., 1986; Koys, 1991). Further, grievance procedures fulfill due process and fairness expectations (Rousseau, 1995). Consistent with these arguments, Bemmels (1995) found grievance procedures positively related to commitment.

H4: The provision of formal dispute resolution procedures is positively related to organizational commitment.

Benefits. As noted, certain HR practices provide both instrumental and affective outcomes. Although benefits certainly have instrumental worth to employees, they also may signal the organization's affective valuation of employees (i.e., organizational support). Further, since many benefits are discretionary, employees should reciprocate with commitment (Eisenberger et al., 1986). Koys (1991) found stronger commitment when benefits are seen as discretionary. finally, some prior results suggest a positive relationship (e.g., Grover and Crooker, 1995).

H5: The level of benefits provided to employees is positively related to commitment.

Employee Involvement. Employee involvement is often viewed as an integral part of High Commitment Work Systems. Involvement in decisions provides a sense of ownership of and commitment to both those decisions and the organization (Guest, 1992). Clearly, employee involvement processes should engender en·gen·der  
v. en·gen·dered, en·gen·der·ing, en·gen·ders
1. To bring into existence; give rise to: "Every cloud engenders not a storm" 
 the perception that the organization values employee contributions. Thus, we predict that involvement increases commitment. Additionally, employee involvement might be perceived by workers as a discretionary positive benefit. In the sense that involvement opportunities are voluntarily provided, employee commitment to the employer-employee relationship should increase. Further, Lawler and Youn (1996) found that when parties to an exchange relationship work together toward a superordinate goal, relational cohesion increases. In that employee involvement serves the dual purposes of enriching jobs and improving organizational processes and outcomes, employee involvement will be positively related to employee commitment to the organization. Previous research has supported a moderately strong link between related measures (e.g., autonomy) and commitment (Kalleberg et al., 1994; Wallace, 1995). Employee involvement is often realized in the form of increased worker responsibility and autonomy (e.g., Stone, 2005). Therefore, we predict:

H6a: Employee responsibility is positively related to organizational commitment.

H6b: Employee autonomy is positively related to organizational commitment.

Incentive Pay. One argument for incentive pay systems is that they harmonize employee and employer interests by aligning incentives. Further, incentive pay systems should promote equity feelings because workers are paid for performance contributions. Accordingly, employees should view incentive pay as a form of support and show increased commitment in return. Despite well-known problems with incentive systems, this basic idea suggests that workers will be more committed in firms where performance is an important earnings influence. Prior research by Florkowski and Schuster (1992) provides some support for the positive effects of an incentive pay system on commitment.

H7: Incentive pay systems are positively related to organizational commitment.

Union Pressure. Union pressure refers to the extent that unions influence a firm's current practices, specifically practices on training and wages. Workers realize how they benefit from union pressure or activity outside their own workplaces (e.g., when wage increases are granted following a union-management settlement elsewhere). Union pressure may promote perceptions that the organization begrudgingly addresses employee concerns. Workers may thus view organizations as lacking commitment to employees, and reduce their commitment. Finally, workers in firms with high union pressure may credit gains received to unions rather than employers, and thus we expect:

H8: Union pressure is negatively related to organizational commitment.

Compensation Cuts. As Wheeler and McClendon (1991) noted, a pay cut is a clear threat to well-being, and encourages hostility. Compensation cuts constitute a clear violation of the psychological contract. Social exchange theory suggests unilateral employer-initiated reductions in the exchange rate will decrease employee attachment. Further, reduced compensation levels also likely fall below employees' comparison levels (CLs) or expected levels of pay. Compensation cuts also signal a lack of employer support, in that employee contributions are devalued de·val·ue   also de·val·u·ate
v. de·val·ued also de·valu·at·ed, de·val·u·ing also de·val·u·at·ing, de·val·ues also de·val·u·ates
1. To lessen or cancel the value of.
 and concerns for employees are seemingly abandoned. Generally, various compensation reductions (e.g., direct cuts in pay and benefits; increased deductibles, co-payments, or employee contributions) should diminish employee commitment.

H9: Compensation cuts are negatively related to organizational commitment.

Downsizing. Downsizing indicates reduced commitment of firms to workers and this causes workers to respond with reduced commitment to employers (Rousseau, 1995). The effect within a given firm is not clearcut, however. Some research suggests that layoff survivors who had the greatest commitment prior to the layoff had greater negative reactions than those who were less committed (Brockner, 1992). Also, "survivors" may be grateful, and new hires (some victims of downsizing elsewhere) may be grateful to their new employers. Thus, we leave this as an empirical question.

H10a: Downsizing is negatively related to organizational commitment among the retained employees.

H10b: Downsizing is positively related to organizational commitment among the retained employees.

Organizational Characteristics

Bureaucratic bu·reau·crat  
1. An official of a bureaucracy.

2. An official who is rigidly devoted to the details of administrative procedure.

 structuring of activities refers to a key dimension of bureaucracy (the other being centralization; Pugh et al., 1968). Structuring is generally thought to indicate greater efficiency (Price and Mueller, 1986), but its impact on worker attitudes is unclear (cf. Adler and Borys, 1996). On the one hand, greater efficiency may mean worker concerns are addressed more effectively, while, on the other, bureaucratic structuring might imply that workers are removed from decisions assigned to specialists and experience the frustration of dealing with layers of specialized bureaucrats. According to according to
1. As stated or indicated by; on the authority of: according to historians.

2. In keeping with: according to instructions.

 Lawler and Youn (1993), the intensity of interaction between parties to exchange influences relational cohesion and each party's commitment. If structuring depersonalizes the exchange, commitment should fall. Although there is evidence that bureaucratic structuring increases commitment in voluntary associations (Knoke, 1990), on balance the benefits of structuring accrue to non-employee stakeholders Stakeholders

All parties that have an interest, financial or otherwise, in a firm-stockholders, creditors, bondholders, employees, customers, management, the community, and the government.
. Consistent with this reasoning and previous results (e.g., Lincoln and Kalleberg, 1985), we expect:

H11: Bureaucratic structuring is negatively related to organizational commitment.

Decentralization de·cen·tral·ize  
v. de·cen·tral·ized, de·cen·tral·iz·ing, de·cen·tral·iz·es
1. To distribute the administrative functions or powers of (a central authority) among several local authorities.
. Previous discussion references issues associated with decentralization, specifically, employee involvement. Although sharing of decision making may operate through such variables, decentralization is more pervasive. For example, employees may value decision making that is "local" and feel committed to such decisions, even if not directly involved. As such, shared decision-making power should engender perceptions of organizational support, beyond effects stipulated earlier. Further, because organizations typically have no formal obligation to distribute decision making, those that do should be perceived positively (e.g., a goodwill symbol). Evidence mildly suggests that workers are more committed to decentralized de·cen·tral·ize  
v. de·cen·tral·ized, de·cen·tral·iz·ing, de·cen·tral·iz·es
1. To distribute the administrative functions or powers of (a central authority) among several local authorities.
 organizations (Mathieu and Zajac, 1990).

H12: Decentralization is positively related to organizational commitment.

Not-for-profit Status. Not for profit (NFP NFP Not for Profit
NFP Natural Family Planning (contraception)
NFP National Focal Point
NFP National Financial Partners Corp.
NFP Nurse Family Partnership (Denver, CO) 
) organizations often exist to serve goals regarded as nobler than the goals of for-profit organizations. Employees are often drawn to NFPs to serve a "cause" (e.g., to help others). Moreover, one may seek employment to serve a cause and subsequently generalize generalize /gen·er·al·ize/ (-iz)
1. to spread throughout the body, as when local disease becomes systemic.

2. to form a general principle; to reason inductively.
 that commitment to the organization. According to ASA theory, employees in organizations whose values and goals are congruent con·gru·ent  
1. Corresponding; congruous.

2. Mathematics
a. Coinciding exactly when superimposed: congruent triangles.

 with their own should form strong attachments (Schneider, 1987). Because a major aspect of commitment is one's identification with organizational goals and values, commitment should be higher in NFPs.

H13: Organizational commitment is higher among employees in not-for-profit organizations than among employees in for-profit organizations.


Figure I provides a graphic summary of the research relationships examined here. As shown, HR practice and organizational characteristics are predicted to have direct effects on organizational commitment. Figure I also presents control variables. Those will be discussed briefly below.




The data used in this study are from the 1991 National Organizations Survey (NOS) database. The NOS consists of two surveys, linked via a hyper-sampling design. Respondents to the 1991 General Social Survey (GSS (storage) GSS - Group-Sweeping Scheduling. ; a national probability sample of adults) were asked to identify their employers. The "NOS proper" was then administered to GSS respondents' employers (also in 1991), yielding a nationally representative sample of employing establishments. (For details on sampling and procedures see Kalleberg et al., 1993, 1996). The GSS component provides data on various employee characteristics and attitudes. Demographic variables such as age, education, and gender are provided, along with a six-item Likert-style scale for organizational commitment based closely on the Organizational Commitment Questionnaire or "OCQ OCQ Ordre des Chimistes du Québec (Québec Corporation of Chemists) " (Mowday et al., 1979).

The real strength of the NOS arises, however, in the richness of the NOS-proper component, the employer survey, and matched employee-employer responses. The quality of available measures varies across issues, but the NOS-proper provides multi-item scales for many HR practices and other organizational characteristics. Just under 400 cases are available with matching surveys and complete responses to items in the organizational commitment measure.


Our measures for most independent variables closely follow previous work by Delaney and Huselid (1996). When possible, we used employer responses to measure HR practices and organizational characteristics. Employee responses (from the GSS) were used to measure organizational commitment and control variables (e.g., job satisfaction). To obtain greater confidence in the scales, we submitted multi-item measures to exploratory factor analysis. In the majority of cases, the constructed scales were, in fact, uni-dimensional. Other scales were examined carefully (based on content) to ensure that multiple dimensions within the single measure were part of a higher-order construct captured by the composite scale. (A detailed description of all measures is provided in an appendix available from the authors.)

Human Resource Practices. Two items were used to measure internal labor markets by assessing the extent of promotion-from-within. A single question was posed for up to three different job types, yielding up to three items used to form a scale measuring hiring selectivity ("In the past two years, about how many applications have you considered for an opening?"). Four items were used to measure training emphasis (e.g., "Within the last two years, how many employees participated in formal job training?"). A single item addressed grievance resolution procedures ("Are there formal procedures for resolving disputes between employees and their supervisors or co-workers?"). Twelve items measured benefits (e.g., medical benefits, sick leave with full pay, pension programs). Two scales were constructed to measure employee involvement. First, a seven-item scale was constructed for worker responsibility (e.g., training of others, evaluation of others' performance). Second, a four-item scale was constructed for worker autonomy (e.g., having substantial decision input, working independently). A single question was posed for up to three different job types, yielding up to three items used to form a scale measuring incentive pay ("How important is job performance in determining individual earnings?"). Four items addressed whether HR practices are influenced by union pressure (e.g., "Is any of the formal training offered because of union contracts?"). Five items were used to measure compensation cuts (e.g., "Over the past two years, has the organization lowered salaries or wages, or given smaller raises to pay for medical or fringe benefits fringe benefits, the benefits, other than wages or salary, provided by an employer for employees (e.g., health insurance, vacation time, disability income).
?"). Finally, one item assessed downsizing ("Compared to one year ago, has the number of full-time employees in the organization increased, decreased, or remained the same?").

Organizational Characteristics. A single item assessed organizations' not-for-profit status ("Not-for-profit status of the organization"--yes or no). A composite index Composite Index

A grouping of equities, indexes or other factors combined in a standardized way, providing a useful statistical measure of overall market or sector performance over time. Also known simply as a "composite".
 based on items used to assess organizational specialization (eight items), departmentalization Departmentalization refers to the process of grouping activities into departments.

Division of labour creates specialists who need coordination. This coordination is facilitated by grouping specialists together in departments.
 (eight items), vertical hierarchy (one item), and formalization for·mal·ize  
tr.v. for·mal·ized, for·mal·iz·ing, for·mal·iz·es
1. To give a definite form or shape to.

a. To make formal.

 (seven items) constituted a measure of bureaucratic structuring. Finally, eight items were used to measure decentralization of decision making.

Organizational Commitment. Mowday et al. (1979) developed the Organizational Commitment Questionnaire (OCQ), a self-report instrument. Three facets were originally proposed, but Mowday et al. (1982) maintain that the OCQ measures a single global construct. Other related measures consistently demonstrate strong consistency with the OCQ (Morrow, 1993). Six items based on the OCQ (Mowday et al., 1979) were used to measure organizational commitment (Davis and Smith, 1991). Except for very minor wording changes, the GSS commitment items were identical to OCQ items. Factor analysis indicated that the six-item OCQ based measure was, in fact, unidimensional.

Control Variables

Other possible antecedents of organizational commitment, which may correlate with the variables of interest, are controlled to obtain unbiased estimates. We control for variables that have shown moderate or strong influences on commitment (Mathieu and Zajac, 1990). Single items were used to measure education, gender, minority status, job complexity, and organizational tenure. Multi-item scales were used for job satisfaction, perceived personal competence, and the perceived fairness of rewards. Although organizational level was formed by consulting multiple items, they were not combined in an additive fashion. Consequently, the organizational level variable does not have an alpha.

Data Analysis

Ordinary least squares (OLS OLS Ordinary Least Squares
OLS Online Library System
OLS Ottawa Linux Symposium
OLS Operation Lifeline Sudan
OLS Operational Linescan System
OLS Online Service
OLS Organizational Leadership and Supervision
OLS On Line Support
OLS Online System
) was used to estimate relationships for two samples. One sample consisted of cases remaining after case-wise deletion deletion /de·le·tion/ (de-le´shun) in genetics, loss of genetic material from a chromosome.

Loss, as from mutation, of one or more nucleotides from a chromosome.
 for missing data (N = 199). The second used the replacement of missing data for independent variables via mean substitution (N = 381). Although no particular variable presented extraordinary missing data problems--no single predictor had less than 334 valid values--the cumulative effect of missing data using case-wise deletion was quite large. Given the sample size gains from missing data replacement (N = 199 versus N = 381), we present results for both samples. For directional hypotheses, we used one-tailed tests. For H10a and H10b and the control variables we used two-tailed tests.


This section will present both descriptive and analytic results. Descriptive statistics descriptive statistics

see statistics.
, including means, standard deviations, correlations, and coefficient alpha (if applicable) are provided in Table 1. (Descriptive statistics following missing data replacement are available from the authors on request.)

Regression results are presented in Table 2. As shown, the overall model was significant (p < .01) for both samples. Explained variance Explained variance is part of the variance of any residual that can be attributed to a specific condition (cause). The other part of variance is unexplained variance. The higher the explained variance relative to the total variance, the stronger the statistical measure used.  in organizational commitment was 40.8 percent in both, and results for individual predictors were similar across samples. Results for the control variables showed that job satisfaction had a strong impact ([beta] = .50 to .52, p < .01) on commitment. Perceived personal competence was marginally significant and positive in Sample 1 (p < .10) but not in Sample 2 (marginal significance level, MSL See multiple single-level.  = .11). Perceived fairness of rewards also was related directly to commitment (p < .05) in Sample 1, but not in Sample 2 (MSL = .14). None of the remaining controls was significant.

Human Resource Practices and Organizational Commitment

Results from the regression analyses indicated that internal labor markets were not significant in either sample. Thus, HI was not supported. Results also failed to support a significant effect for hiring selectivity. Thus, H2 was not supported. In fact, the coefficient for the selectivity variable was large relative to its standard error in both samples with the "wrong" sign; that is, the results tend to "disconfirm" H2. Hypothesis 3, which stipulated that employee training was positively related to commitment, was not supported in either sample. Hypothesis 4, which posited that grievance resolution procedures are positively related to organizational commitment, was supported in Sample 2 (p < .05), but its coefficient was not significant in Sample 1 (MSL =. 17). Hypothesis 5, which predicted that employee benefits increase organizational commitment, was not supported in either sample. Hypothesis 6a, which argued that responsibility is positively related to organizational commitment, was supported in Sample 1 (p < .01) and marginally supported in Sample 2 (p < .10). Hypothesis 6b, which stipulated that individual autonomy is positively related to organizational commitment, was supported in Sample 2 (p < .01) and marginally supported in Sample 1 (p < .10). None of the remaining hypotheses for HR practices received support, with the exception of H9 (concerning compensation cuts' adverse effects on organizational commitment), which received marginal support in Sample 1 (p < .10) but not in Sample 2 (MSL = .11).

Organizational Characteristics and Organizational Commitment

Results from the regression analyses did not support H11, which stated that bureaucratic structure is negatively related to organizational commitment. However, H12, which predicted that decentralization of decision making is positively related to commitment, was supported in Sample 1 (p < .05) and Sample 2 (p < .01). Finally, H13, positing higher commitment in not-for-profits, was not supported. Overall, the [R.sup.2] change due to organizational characteristics was approximately .02 in both samples, a significant change (p < .05) for Sample 2, but not in Sample 1 (MSL = .16).

Removing Job Satisfaction from the Analysis

Including job satisfaction as a predictor of commitment may "stack the deck Stack the Deck is a pricing game on The Price Is Right. Debuting on October 9, 2006, it is played for a car. Gameplay
The contestant is shown seven digits, in the style of playing cards, and five spaces representing the price of the car.
" against finding HR practice effects; that is, these practices affect job satisfaction and, thus, by including job satisfaction as a control, only direct effects of HR practices on commitment would show in our findings. Direct effects are in fact what we posited, but the large effect for job satisfaction led us to examine equations without the job satisfaction predictor to assess the sensitivity of our results for hypothesized effects. Without job satisfaction, the [R.sup.2] values dropped dramatically (e.g., to .21 for Sample 1), but the results for HR practices and organizational characteristics changed little. In Sample 1, for example, without job satisfaction the grievance mechanisms variable became significant at the .10 level, whereas it was not significant (MSL = .17) with job satisfaction included. In either case, the responsibility, autonomy, compensation cuts, and decentralization variables were significant with the signs shown in Table 2, and no other HR practice or organizational characteristic variables were significant.

Synergy Among HR Practices

One possible explanation for the modest evidence for HR practice effects involves synergy among HR practices--individual practices may be less important than their configuration. Following Delaney and Huselid (1996), we created an index where each firm "scored" one point for each instance where its practice on one of seven "progressive" HR practices (e.g., internal labor markets, selective hiring) exceeded the sample mean. The results for this variable were not significant in Sample 1 (MSL = .12) or in Sample 2 (MSL = .29). Results for other variables were similar to those in Table 2. Thus, as in Delaney and Huselid's study of firm performance, there was no evidence of a synergistic effect Synergistic effect

A violation of value-additivity in that the value of a combination is greater than the sum of the individual values.
 for HR practices.

Employee Reports versus Employer Reports and Measurement Quality

Most of the multi-item scales used demonstrated acceptable reliability, but some were constructed from individual items that were not part of recognized, validated scales. Although we examined the dimensionality and reliability of multi-item scales, there are grounds to question the validity of some measures. Perhaps the case of the single-item measure for grievance resolution practices best illustrates this point. Our sample's employers responded to a yes/no question: "Are there formal procedures for resolving disputes between employees and their supervisors or co-workers?" An affirmative response can mean many things, from an anonymous suggestion/complaint box to a formal procedure with codified cod·i·fy  
tr.v. cod·i·fied, cod·i·fy·ing, cod·i·fies
1. To reduce to a code: codify laws.

2. To arrange or systematize.
 employee rights and provisions for impartial resolution by an arbitrator arbitrator n. one who conducts an arbitration, and serves as a judge who conducts a "mini-trial," somewhat less formally than a court trial. In most cases the arbitraror is an attorney, either alone or as part of a panel.  (i.e., from "window dressing Window Dressing

A strategy used by mutual fund and portfolio managers near the year or quarter end to improve the appearance of the portfolio/fund performance before presenting it to clients or shareholders.
" to a genuine "system of industrial jurisprudence jurisprudence (jr'ĭsprd`əns), study of the nature and the origin and development of law. "). Given this, the positive but modest evidence merits some respect, as it seems likely that our results understate un·der·state  
v. un·der·stat·ed, un·der·stat·ing, un·der·states
1. To state with less completeness or truth than seems warranted by the facts.

 the organizational commitment effects of formal voice mechanisms. Although other measures may be less problematic in such regards, this may be a general problem in measuring HR practices from informant informant Historian Medtalk A person who provides a medical history  reports. In effect, what employers report and what employees experience may diverge diverge - If a series of approximations to some value get progressively further from it then the series is said to diverge.

The reduction of some term under some evaluation strategy diverges if it does not reach a normal form after a finite number of reductions.
. Nominally similar HR practices may diverge as a function of top management commitment to these practices, among other reasons.

To explore this issue further, we experimented in the area of employee benefits, the only area of HR practices where our data provided comparable reports from both employees and employers. The sensitivity of our results to reliance on imperfect reports from employers may be seen by examining the comparative predictive power The predictive power of a scientific theory refers to its ability to generate testable predictions. Theories with strong predictive power are highly valued, because the predictions can often encourage the falsification of the theory.  of employee reports. Overall, the results in specifications substituting the employee-based measure for the employer-based measure were very similar to those reported in Table 2, yet the coefficient for the benefits scale based on employee reports was positive and at least marginally significant (p < .07 or better) in both samples. This lends some credence to the possibility that a reason for the disappointing results may be shortcomings in the employer-based measures. Unfortunately, it is not possible to separate this possibility from the confounding confounding

when the effects of two, or more, processes on results cannot be separated, the results are said to be confounded, a cause of bias in disease studies.

confounding factor
 effects of common method variance that may inflate inflate - deflate  results for employee-based measures (see below).


Much of prior literature suggests that HR practices and other organizational characteristics influence organizational commitment. However, little research has tested these predictions. Further, virtually all prior research used single-site samples. Thus, the ability to generalize has been limited. To address these shortcomings, we examined the effects of HR practices and organizational characteristics using a diverse national probability sample of U.S. workers and their employing organizations.

Overall, the [R.sup.2] change due to HR practice measures in both samples is on the order of .05, a significant change in a joint F-test (p < .01) in Sample 2, but not in Sample 1. The results for these joint tests are notable in summarizing the collective effects of HR practices, and particularly in terms of overcoming co-linearity problems that can make tests for individual variables unreliable. That is, to the extent that HR practices co-vary strongly, their individual effects are difficult to estimate with precision, but the joint F-test includes their common as well as unique effects. Thus, along with the modest correlations among HR practices and other predictor variables indicated in Table 1, the joint F-test results lead us to discount co-linearity as an explanation for the HR practices results. Note that bivariate bi·var·i·ate  
Mathematics Having two variables: bivariate binomial distribution.

Adj. 1.
 correlations between HR practice measures and commitment in Table 1 are modest to weak. This is not an instance where predictor-criterion relations are obscured by correlation among predictors.

Taken as a whole, the results provide limited support for the proposed effects of HR practices and organizational characteristics. Specifically, for HR practices, results showed that grievance resolution procedures, compensation cuts (inversely), and employee involvement predicted commitment. Further, the only organizational characteristic that predicted commitment was decentralization.

Many hypotheses were not supported. These findings may call into question the attitudinal commitment effects of some HR practices (e.g., generous benefits, internal labor markets) and organizational characteristics (e.g., bureaucratic structure, not-for-profit status). At the same time, we acknowledge that hindsight suggests other possible explanations. Nonsignificant non·sig·nif·i·cant  
1. Not significant.

2. Having, producing, or being a value obtained from a statistical test that lies within the limits for being of random occurrence.
 or marginal results for many HR practices may lie in the nature of the variables. Specifically, given the relatively fixed, stable quality of most HR practices, it may be that the influence of these organizational-level factors is a bit far removed from the attitudinal variable of organizational commitment (cf. Mathieu and Zajac, 1990). That is, certain human resource practices may constitute more distant rather than more immediate influences. Accordingly, observed effects of HR practices may not be very strong. Becker et al.'s (1996) findings on supervisory commitment as a predictor of performance indicates that more immediate influences may have stronger effects.

Aside from the quality of measures, there is the question of omitted variables. Although the NOS provided at least a reasonable proxy for many commitment antecedents identified in previous research, some gaps are evident. We already noted the absence of direct employee involvement measures. Another notable gap is initial employee socialization socialization /so·cial·iza·tion/ (so?shal-i-za´shun) the process by which society integrates the individual and the individual learns to behave in socially acceptable ways.

, and we were unable to identify any reasonable proxy for this concept. Future research needs to further examine these variables.

Another issue is statistical power. Based on our sample sizes and number of predictors, tables for a power level of .80 (e.g., Green, 1991) suggests that this study was capable of detecting moderate or strong effects, but perhaps not small effects. Limitations in measures noted above may combine with limited power to account for some disappointing findings. Despite some positive and interesting findings, questions remain about HR practice or organizational characteristic effects on commitment.

A final possible limitation is the age of the data. HR practices and employee expectations have certainly changed since the surveys were administered in 1991. Although the dataset is older, the results are still applicable to current business practices. Most or all of the HR practice variables tested in this study are still widely used in organizations and are subjects of continuing research debate. Also, considering the breadth of organizations sampled, it is unlikely that either employee expectations or HR practices have significantly changed across the range of workplaces surveyed. However, future research could attempt to replicate these findings using a more recently sampled population.

Despite limitations, this study makes important contributions. A major contribution is that it examines the influences of numerous HR practices and organization-level factors on organizational commitment rarely examined in prior research or that have been examined only in a single site. As such, the study provides some insight on the "commitment maximizing" effects of HR practices and organizational characteristics suggested by some scholars (e.g., Guest, 1992). A second contribution lies in the relatively unique quality of the data (despite limitations noted). Specifically, the fact that data cross levels from multiple, independent sources and were collected at different times contributes to the validity of the findings, the confidence that can be placed in them, and the conclusions that can be drawn. Further, because the study results are based upon data obtained from a nationally diverse probability sample, the generality is higher than in most prior studies. Finally, the nature of the relationships examined herein also allows stronger causal inferences to be drawn than is possible in most commitment research. Specifically, the probable direction of influence is much stronger for the effects of HR practices and organizational characteristics on organizational commitment than for the reverse effects. This is consistent with Mathieu and Zajac's (1990) call for improved causal analysis and inference.

For practitioners, these results indicate the importance of employee "voice" through grievance resolution procedures, employee involvement, and decentralization. In particular, if one views employee involvement programs to be generally consonant consonant

Any speech sound characterized by an articulation in which a closure or narrowing of the vocal tract completely or partially blocks the flow of air; also, any letter or symbol representing such a sound.
 with the decentralization of decision making (a structural method for increasing worker autonomy) and programs designed to increase employee "voice," the overall pattern of results converges to provide support for an "empowerment" effect. Thus, it appears that organizational practices and characteristics that provide for the expression of worker interests are the strongest organizational determinants of employee commitment.

The cumulative effect of the preceding research design qualities is a level of methodological rigor that is often absent in organizational commitment research, which frequently relies on self-report data collected at a single point in time, leaving results open to common method variance explanations. Mathieu and Zajac (1990) noted in their meta-analytic review that the average adjusted correlation of organizational commitment with other variables, when both were measured with self-report instruments, was 2.66 times larger than the same average adjusted correlation when different measurement methods or data sources were used. It is notable that Mathieu and Zajac's (1990) meta-analytic findings showed that the average adjusted correlation across commitment and related variables, when using different measurement sources and methods, was a mere. 132. Therefore, despite the potential limitations noted earlier, our findings may, in fact, be more meaningful than first appears.

Finally, both established theoretical bases and prior organizational commitment research were used to ground the hypotheses in the present study. Although the notion of exchange between employer and employee has been recognized in the area of organizational commitment (cf. Mowday et al., 1982), none of the prior work that we reviewed provided a clear and explicit theoretical integration of organizational commitment with social exchange theory. Given that social exchange theory addresses both instrumental and affective exchanges, it could serve as a basis for integrating conceptions of calculative or continuance The adjournment or postponement of an action pending in a court to a later date of the same or another session of the court, granted by a court in response to a motion made by a party to a lawsuit.  commitment (which are based on instrumental or economic concerns) and the attitudinal conception of commitment examined here. For example, social exchange theory examines how relationships initially based on instrumental concerns may later become more affectively af·fec·tive  
adj. Psychology
1. Influenced by or resulting from the emotions.

2. Concerned with or arousing feelings or emotions; emotional.
 oriented and could prove useful in understanding the dynamics of how commitment develops over time (cf. Mathieu and Zajac, 1990; Mowday et al., 1982). An explicit treatment of commitment based on social exchange theory also might be useful in generating new, insightful hypotheses. For example, theory predicts that interaction frequency or intensity leads to a stronger relational affect and cohesion, and the objectification of the relationship as a unique, valued entity. Future research, therefore, might examine whether the frequency or intensity of organizational-individual interactions predicts commitment (e.g., the relative effects of social activities or communications on member commitment).

* We thank Dan Gallagher Dan Gallagher (May 14,1957 - January 20,2001) was a Canadian broadcaster who hosted the CBC Television music video program Video Hits from 1991 to 1993. In the 1980s he appeared on the Canadian music channel MuchMusic as a VJ and host of the Pepsi Power Hour.  for helpful comments on an earlier draft of this paper. Cynthia Fukami provided useful comments on the literature. We are grateful to John Delaney John Adrian Delaney (born June 29, 1956) is an American politician of the Republican Party. He was the mayor of Jacksonville, Florida, serving two consecutive terms from 1995 to 2003. , Mark Huselid, and David Knoke for assistance in using the National Organizations Survey. Marc Street provided research assistance. We thank Kevin Halligan for special assistance.


Adler, P. and B. Borys. 1996. "Two Types of Bureaucracy: Enabling and Coercive co·er·cive  
Characterized by or inclined to coercion.

co·ercive·ly adv.
." Administrative Science Quarterly Administrative Science Quarterly, founded in 1956, is one of the most eminent academic journals in the field of organizational studies. It is published by Cornell University.

People claimed to have been involved as founders include James D.
 41: 61-89.

Agarwala, T. 2003. "Innovative Human Resource Practices and Organizational Commitment: An Empirical Investigation." International Journal of Human Resource Management 14: 175-197.

Althauser, R. 1989. "Internal Labor Markets." In Annual Review of Sociology 15. Eds. W. Scott and J. Blake. Palo Alto Palo Alto, city, California
Palo Alto (păl`ō ăl`tō), city (1990 pop. 55,900), Santa Clara co., W Calif.; inc. 1894. Although primarily residential, Palo Alto has aerospace, electronics, and advanced research industries.
, CA: Annual Reviews, Inc. pp. 143-161.

Becker, T., R. Billings, D. Eveleth and N. Gilbert. 1996. "Foci and Bases of Commitment: Implications for Job Performance." Academy of Management Journal 39: 464-482.

Bemmels, B. 1995. "Dual Commitment: Unique Construct or Epiphenomenon epiphenomenon /epi·phe·nom·e·non/ (ep?i-fe-nom´e-non) an accessory, exceptional, or accidental occurrence in the course of any disease.

?" Journal of Labor Research The Journal of Labor Research is a journal which publishes articles regarding labor relations in the United States.

The journal publishes articles which cover a wide variety of topics in labor relations, including the nature of work, labor-management relations,
 16: 401-422.

Berger, C. and L. Cummings. 1990. "Organizational Structure, Attitudes, and Behavior." In Personality and Organizational Influence. Eds. B. Staw and L. Cummings. Greenwich, CT: JAI JAI Java Advanced Imaging
JAI Justice et Affaires Interiéures (French: Justice and Home Affairs)
JAI Journal of ASTM International
JAI Just An Idea
JAI Jazz Alliance International
JAI Joint Africa Institute
 Press. pp. 287-326.

Bills, D. 1987. "Costs, Commitment, and Rewards: Factors Influencing the Design and Implementation of Internal Labor Markets." Administrative Science Quarterly 32: 202-221.

Brockner, J. 1992. "Managing the Effects of Layoffs on Survivors." California Management Review 34: 9-28.

Burton, J, T. Lee and B. Holtom. 2002. "The Influence of Motivation to Attend, Ability to Attend, and Organizational Commitment on Different Types of Absence Behaviors." Journal of Managerial Issues 14 (2): 181-197.

Caldwell, D., J. Chatman and C. O'Reilly. 1990. "Building Organizational Commitment: A Multifirm Study." Journal of Occupational Psychology 63: 245-261.

Colbert, A. and I-W. Kwon. 2000. "Factors Related to the Organizational Commitment of College and University Auditors." Journal of Managerial Issues 12 (4): 484-501.

Cook, K., L. Molm and T. Yamagishi. 1993. "Exchange Relations and Exchange Networks: Recent Developments in Social Exchange Theory." In Theoretical Research Programs: Studies in the Growth of Theory. Eds. J. Berger and M. Zelditch, Jr. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Stanford University, at Stanford, Calif.; coeducational; chartered 1885, opened 1891 as Leland Stanford Junior Univ. (still the legal name). The original campus was designed by Frederick Law Olmsted. David Starr Jordan was its first president.  Press. pp. 296-322.

Davis, J. and T. Smith. 1991. General Social Surveys, 1972-1991: Cumulative Codebook codebook - data dictionary . Storrs, CT: Roper Center for Public Opinion Research.

Delaney, J. and M. Huselid. 1996. "The Impact of Human Resource Management Practices on Perceptions of Organizational Performance." Academy of Management Journal 39: 949-969.

Eaton, S. 2003. "If You Can Use Them: Flexibility Policies, Organizational Commitment, and Perceived Performance." Industrial Relations industrial relations
Relations between the management of an industrial enterprise and its employees.

industrial relations
Noun, pl

the relations between management and workers
 42: 145-167.

Eisenberger, R., P. Fasolo and V. Davis-Lamastro. 1990. "Perceived Organizational Support and Employee Diligence, Commitment, and Innovation." Journal of Applied Psychology Journal of Applied Psychology is a publication of the APA. It has a high impact factor for its field. It typically publishes high quality empirical papers.

 75: 51-60.

--, R. Huntington, S. Hutchison and D. Sowa. 1986. "Perceived Organizational Support." Journal of Applied Psychology 71: 500-507.

Farrell, D. and C. Stamm. 1988. "Meta-analysis of the Correlates of Employee Absence." Human Relations human relations nplrelaciones fpl humanas  41:211-227.

Florkowski, G. and M. Schuster. 1992. "Support for Profit Sharing profit sharing, arrangement by which employees receive, in addition to their wages, a share of the net profits of a business. The purpose is to give them an incentive to increase their output through enhanced morale, less wasteful use of materials, better care of  and Organizational Commitment: A Path Analysis." Human Relations 45: 507523.

Green, S. 1991. "How Many Subjects Does It Take to Do a Regression Analysis In statistics, a mathematical method of modeling the relationships among three or more variables. It is used to predict the value of one variable given the values of the others. For example, a model might estimate sales based on age and gender. ?" Multivariate Behavioral Research 26:499-510.

Grover, S. and K. Crooker. 1995. "Who Appreciates Family-responsive Human Resource Practices: The Impact of Family-friendly Practices on the Organizational Attachment of Parents and Nonparents." Personnel Psychology 48: 271-288.

Guest, D. 1992. "Employee Commitment and Control." In Employment Relations: The Psychology of Influence and Control at Work. Eds. J. F. Hartley and G. M. Stephenson. Oxford, England: Blackwell Publishers, Inc.

Hammer, T. H. and A. Avgar. 2005. "The Impact of Unions on Job Satisfaction, Organizational Commitment, and Turnover." Journal of Labor Research 26: 241-266.

Jandeska, K. E. and M. L. Kraimer. 2005. "Women's Perceptions of Organizational Culture, Work Attitudes, and Role-modeling Behaviors." Journal of Managerial Issues 17 (4): 461-478.

Kalleberg, A., D. Knoke, P. Marsden and J. Spaeth. 1996. Organizations in America: Analyzing Their Structures and Human Resource Practices. Newbury Park, CA: Sage. --, --, -- and --. 1994. "The National Organizations Study: An Introduction and Overview." American Behavioral Scientist 37: 860-871.

--, --, -- and --. 1993. National Organizations Survey (NOS), 1991 [computer file]. Champaign, IL: University of Illinois University of Illinois may refer to:
  • University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign (flagship campus)
  • University of Illinois at Chicago
  • University of Illinois at Springfield
  • University of Illinois system
It can also refer to:
 Survey Research Laboratory [producer]. Ann Arbor Ann Arbor, city (1990 pop. 109,592), seat of Washtenaw co., S Mich., on the Huron River; inc. 1851. It is a research and educational center, with a large number of government and industrial research and development firms, many in high-technology fields such as , MI: Interuniversity Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor], 1994.

Knoke, D. 1990. Organizing for Collective Action. New York New York, state, United States
New York, Middle Atlantic state of the United States. It is bordered by Vermont, Massachusetts, Connecticut, and the Atlantic Ocean (E), New Jersey and Pennsylvania (S), Lakes Erie and Ontario and the Canadian province of
, NY: Aldine de Gruyter.

Koys, D. 1991. "Fairness, Legal Compliance, and Organizational Commitment." Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal 4: 283-291.

Lawler, E. and J. Youn. 1996. "Commitment in Exchange Relations: Test of a Theory of Relational Cohesion." American Sociological Review 61: 89-108.

-- and --. 1993. "Power and the Emergence of Commitment Behavior in Negotiated Exchange." American Sociological Review 58: 465-481.

Lincoln, J. and A. Kalleberg. 1985. "Work Organization and Workforce Commitment: A Study of Plants and Employees in the U.S. and Japan." American Sociological Review 50: 738-760.

Mathieu, J. and D. Zajac. 1990. "A Review and Metaanalysis of the Antecedents, Correlates, and Consequences of Organizational Commitment." Psychological Bulletin 108: 171-194.

Maurer, T. and B. Tarulli. 1994. "Investigation of Perceived Environment, Perceived Outcome, and Person Variables in Relationship to Voluntary Development Activity by Employees." Journal of Applied Psychology 79: 3-14.

Meyer, J. and N. Mlen. 1997. Commitment in the Workplace: Theory, Research, and Application. Thousand Oaks Thousand Oaks, residential city (1990 pop. 104,352), Ventura co., S Calif., in a farm area; inc. 1964. Avocados, citrus, vegetables, strawberries, and nursery products are grown. , CA: Sage Publications This article or section needs sources or references that appear in reliable, third-party publications. Alone, primary sources and sources affiliated with the subject of this article are not sufficient for an accurate encyclopedia article. .

Morris, J. and J. Sherman. 1981. "Generalizability of an Organizational Commitment Model." Academy of Management Journal 24: 512-526.

Morrow, P. 1993. The Theory and Measurement of Work Commitment. Greenwich, CT: JM Press.

Mowday, R., L. Porter and R. Steers. 1982. Employee-organization Linkages. New York, NY: Academic Press.

--, R. Steers and L. Porter. 1979. "The Measurement of Organizational Commitment." Journal of Vocational Behavior 14: 224-247.

Ogilvie, J. 1986. "The Role of Human Resource Management Practices in Predicting Organizational Commitment." Group and Organizational Studies 11: 335-359.

Osterman, P. 1995. "Work/Family Programs and the Employment Relationship." Administrative Science Quarterly 40: 681-700.

--. 1994. "How Common is Workplace Transformation and How Can We Explain Who Does It?" Industrial and Labor Relations Review Industrial and Labor Relations Review is a publication of the Cornell University School of Industrial and Labor Relations. It is an interdisciplinary journal publishing original research on all aspects of labor relations.  47: 173-188.

Payne, S. C. and A. H. Huffman. 2005. "A Longitudinal Examination of the Influence of Mentoring on Organizational Commitment and Turnover." Academy of Management Journal 48: 158-168.

Price, J. and C. Mueller. 1986. Handbook of Organizational Measurement. Marshfield, MA: Pitman Publishing, Inc.

Price, K. 1990. "Declining Employee Commitment: What It Means, Why It Is Happening, and What We Can Do About It." In Human Resource Strategies for Organizations in Transition. Eds. R.J. Niehaus and K. F. Price. New York, NY: Plenum In a building, the space between the real ceiling and the dropped ceiling, which is often used as an air duct for heating and air conditioning. It is also filled with electrical, telephone and network wires. See plenum cable.  Press. pp. 183-197.

Pugh, D., D. Hickson, C. Hinings and C. Turner. 1968. "Dimensions of Organization Structure." Administrative Science Quarterly 13: 65-105.

Quarles, R. 1994. "An Examination of Promotion Opportunities and Evaluation Criteria as Mechanisms for Affecting Internal Auditor Internal auditor

An employee of a company who analyzes the company's accounting records to that the company is following and complying with all regulations.
 Commitment, Job Satisfaction and Turnover Intentions." Journal of Managerial Issues 6(2): 176-194.

Rousseau, D. 1995. Psychological Contracts in Organizations: Understanding Written and Unwritten LAW, UNWRITTEN, or lex non scripta. All the laws which do not come under the definition of written law; it is composed, principally, of the law of nature, the law of nations, the common law, and customs.  Agreements. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

--and K. WadeBenzoni. 1995. "Changing Individual-Organizational Attachments." In The Changing Nature of Work. Ed. A. Howard. San Francisco San Francisco (săn frănsĭs`kō), city (1990 pop. 723,959), coextensive with San Francisco co., W Calif., on the tip of a peninsula between the Pacific Ocean and San Francisco Bay, which are connected by the strait known as the Golden , CA: Jossey-Bass. pp. 290-322.

Schneider, B. 1987. "The People Make the Place." Personnel Psychology 40: 437-453.

--, H. Goldstein and D. Smith. 1995. "The ASA Framework: An Update." Personnel Psychology 48: 747-773.

Stone, D. 2005. "Employee Involvement." In The Blackwell Encyclopedia of Management: Human Resource Management. Ed. S. Cartwright. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing. pp. 110-111.

Strober, M. 1990. "Human Capital Theory: Implications for HR Managers." Industrial Relations 29: 214-239.

Wallace, J. 1995. "Organizational and Professional Commitment in Professional and Nonprofessional non·pro·fes·sion·al  
One who is not a professional.

 Organizations." Administrative Science Quarterly 40: 228-255.

Wheeler, H. and J. McClendon. 1991. "The Individual Decision to Unionize." In The State of the Unions. Eds. G. Strauss, D. G. Gallagher and J. Fiorito. Madison, WI: Industrial Relations Research Association. pp. 4783.

Williams, L. and J. Hazer. 1986. "Antecedents and Consequences of Satisfaction and Commitment in Turnover Models: A Re-analysis Using Latent Variable In statistics, Latent variables (as opposed to observable variables), are variables that are not directly observed but are rather inferred (through a mathematical model) from other variables that are observed and directly measured.  Structural Equation Methods." Journal of Applied Psychology 71: 219-231.

Wright, T. and D. Bonett. 2002. "The Moderating Effects of Employee Tenure on the Relations Between Organizational Commitment and Job Performance: A Meta-analysis." Journal of Applied Psychology 87:1183-1190.

Jack Fiorito

J. Frank Dame Professor of Management

Florida State University Florida State University, at Tallahassee; coeducational; chartered 1851, opened 1857. Present name was adopted in 1947. Special research facilities include those in nuclear science and oceanography.  

Dennis P. Bozeman

Associate Professor of Management

University of Houston

Angela Young

Associate Professor of Management

California State University Enrollment
 Los Angeles Los Angeles (lôs ăn`jələs, lŏs, ăn`jəlēz'), city (1990 pop. 3,485,398), seat of Los Angeles co., S Calif.; inc. 1850.  

James A. Meurs

Doctoral Student

Florida State University
Table 1
Means, Standard Deviations, Reliabilities, and Correlations (N = 199)

Variable                   Mean       SD      1      2      3      4

1  Org. Commitment         2.774    0.480   (77)
2  Internal Market         0.033    0.640   -07    (71)
3  Selectivity             0.110    0.764    03     23    (67)
4  Training                0.092    0.802   -06     33     27    (89)
5  Grievance Mechanisms    0.759    0.429    03     33     12     39
6  Benefits                0.692    0.177   -01     44     21     31
7  Responsibility          2.070    1.988    17    -07     05    -04
8  Autonomy               11.447    2.775    30     00    -01    -13
9  Incentive Pay           2.645    0.564    09    -01     05    -08
10 Union Pressure          1.408    0.589    04     19     07     25
11 Compensation Cuts       0.176    0.184   -22     18    -06     23
12 Downsizing              0.236    0.426    00     11    -02     10
13 Not-for-Profit          0.397    0.491   -02     08     08     19
14 Structuring             0.107    0.726   -01     46     32     49
15 Decentralization        3.521    0.978    06     16     34     21
16 Education              13.724    2.689    07     03     21     04
17 Gender                  0.528    0.500   -03    -02    -02    -05
18 Minority                0.106    0.308   -08     16     07     07
19 Job Complexity         44.995   14.289    08    -04     10     06
20 Org. Tenure             7.819    8.732   -02     05    -15     03
21 Org. Level              0.452    0.715    20    -20    -09    -18
22 Job Satisfaction        0.029    0.679    55    -06     08    -13
23 Perceived Competence    3.889    0.659    10    -05     09    -04
24 Fairness of Rewards     0.595    0.357    13     00    -02    -03

Variable                        5      6      7      8      9     10

1  Org. Commitment
2  Internal Market
3  Selectivity
4  Training
5  Grievance Mechanisms       (--)
6  Benefits                    37    (79)
7  Responsibility             -06     00    (78)
8  Autonomy                   -03    -02     15    (78)
9  Incentive Pay              -06     01    -01     13    (84)
10 Union Pressure              28     16     03     03    -28    (79)
11 Compensation Cuts           10     27    -03    -15    -04     13
12 Downsizing                  09     11    -07    -06    -06     21
13 Not-for-Profit              36     00    -05     04    -30     16
14 Structuring                 47     41     05    -03    -03     19
15 Decentralization           -01     13    -01    -06     14    -06
16 Education                  -01     08     09     20     02     02
17 Gender                     -06    -16    -10    -10     02    -07
18 Minority                    19     09    -14    -19     00    -03
19 Job Complexity              07    -01     07     19     04     00
20 Org. Tenure                 17     12     06     06    -01     22
21 Org. Level                  00    -08     29     29     09    -08
22 Job Satisfaction           -04    -06     02     31     09    -06
23 Perceived Competence       -01     02     14     06     01    -01
24 Fairness of Rewards        -08    -19    -11     05    -04     11

Variable                       11     12      13    14     15     16

1  Org. Commitment
2  Internal Market
3  Selectivity
4  Training
5  Grievance Mechanisms
6  Benefits
7  Responsibility
8  Autonomy
9  Incentive Pay
10 Union Pressure
11 Compensation Cuts          (42)
12 Downsizing                  09    (--)
13 Not-for-Profit             -02    -06    (--)
14 Structuring                 13     14     19    (79)
15 Decentralization            02     06    -09     45    (91)
16 Education                   06    -01     25    -01     07    (--)
17 Gender                     -05    -02     15    -13    -06     02
18 Minority                    04     19    -01     14     14    -08
19 Job Complexity             -01    -04     36     01     01     60
20 Org. Tenure                -01     08    -10     02     02    -22
21 Org. Level                 -16    -07    -05    -07    -03     23
22 Job Satisfaction           -27    -04    -08    -11    -05    -02
23 Perceived Competence       -07    -17    -03    -03     00    -02
24 Fairness of Rewards        -03    -13     08    -08    -10    -08

Variable                      17     18     19     20

1  Org. Commitment
2  Internal Market
3  Selectivity
4  Training
5  Grievance Mechanisms
6  Benefits
7  Responsibility
8  Autonomy
9  Incentive Pay
10 Union Pressure
11 Compensation Cuts
12 Downsizing
13 Not-for-Profit
14 Structuring
15 Decentralization
16 Education
17 Gender                    (--)
18 Minority                   10    (--)
19 Job Complexity             14    -14    (--)
20 Org. Tenure               -09     00    -10    (--)
21 Org. Level                -11    -06     23     12
22 Job Satisfaction          -03    -13    -04     00
23 Perceived Competence       00     10    -04     07
24 Fairness of Rewards        19    -22     02    -04

Variable                      21     22     23     24

1  Org. Commitment
2  Internal Market
3  Selectivity
4  Training
5  Grievance Mechanisms
6  Benefits
7  Responsibility
8  Autonomy
9  Incentive Pay
10 Union Pressure
11 Compensation Cuts
12 Downsizing
13 Not-for-Profit
14 Structuring
15 Decentralization
16 Education
17 Gender
18 Minority
19 Job Complexity
20 Org. Tenure
21 Org. Level                (--)
22 Job Satisfaction           15    (--)
23 Perceived Competence       23    -02    (68)
24 Fairness of Rewards       -14     13    -22    (56)

Notes: Decimals omitted for correlations and reliabilities
(shown on diagonals for multi-item scales).

Correlations of approximately .14 or larger in absolute value
are significant at the .05 level or better (two-tailed test).

Correlations of approximately .18 or larger in absolute value
are significant at the .01 level or better.

Table 2
Standardized Regression Results for Organizational Commitment

                                              Sample 1
                                              (N = 199)
Independent Variables             [beta]       [delta]    F([delta]
                                              [R.sup.2]   [R.sup.2])

Human Resource Practices                        .058         1.55
  Internal Labor Markets         -0.068
  Selectivity in Hiring          -0.128
  Training                         .020
  Grievance Mechanisms             .078
  Benefits                         .073
  Responsibility                   .150 **
  Autonomy                         .093 (+)
  Incentive Pay                    .044
  Union Pressure                   .094
  Compensation Cuts               -.095 (+)
  Downsizing                       .016
Organizational Characteristics                  .018         1.76
  Bureaucratic Structure         -0.021
  Decentralization                 .156 *
  Not-for-Profit Status           -.011
Control Variables
  Education                        .024
  Gender (Female)                 -.014
  Minority Status                  .032
  Job Complexity                   .057
  Organizational Tenure          -0.096
  Organizational Level             .010
  Job Satisfaction                 .504 **
  Perceived Personal
     Competence                    .118 *
  Fairness of Rewards              .136 *
Overall F                                      5.245**
[R.sup.2]                                       .408
Adjusted [R.sup.2]                              .330

                                               Sample 2
                                               (N = 381)
Independent Variables              [beta]       [delta]    F([delta]
                                               [R.sup.2]   [R.sup.2])

Human Resource Practices                         .049        2.68**
  Internal Labor Markets            .042
  Selectivity in Hiring            -.120
  Training                          .025
  Grievance Mechanisms              .117 *
  Benefits                        -0.038
  Responsibility                    .063 (+)
  Autonomy                          .151 **
  Incentive Pay                   -0.022
  Union Pressure                    .022
  Compensation Cuts               -0.055
  Downsizing                        .020
Organizational Characteristics                   .016        3.25*
  Bureaucratic Structure          -0.067
  Decentralization                  .147 **
  Not-for-Profit Status            -.002
Control Variables
  Education                        -.011
  Gender (Female)                  -.027
  Minority Status                  -.021
  Job Complexity                    .030
  Organizational Tenure            -.055
  Organizational Level              .061
  Job Satisfaction                  .516 **
  Perceived Personal
     Competence                     .071
  Fairness of Rewards               .066
Overall F                                      10.673**
[R.sup.2]                                        .408
Adjusted [R.sup.2]                               .370

Notes: (+) p < .10, *p < .05, **p < .01. The [delta][R.sup.2] (change
in [R.sup.2]) and associated F-statistics are for removal of the
specified sets of variables, that is when all other variables are
retained in the equations.
COPYRIGHT 2007 Pittsburg State University - Department of Economics
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2007 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

 Reader Opinion




Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Author:Fiorito, Jack; Bozeman, Dennis P.; Young, Angela; Meurs, James A.
Publication:Journal of Managerial Issues
Date:Jun 22, 2007
Previous Article:Integrating employment contracts and comparisons: what one can teach us about the other.
Next Article:Equifinality and the strategic groups--performance relationship.

Terms of use | Copyright © 2014 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters