One or the other or both: in the battle between J2EE and .NET, insurers must determine which platform best fits their needs.Although insurers have been able to choose between J2EE (Java 2 Platform, Enterprise Edition) A platform from Sun for building distributed enterprise applications. J2EE services are performed in the middle tier between the user's machine and the enterprise's databases and legacy information systems. and .NET technology platforms for nearly a decade, the decision is still far from easy. Sun Microsystems' Java 2, Enterprise Edition, better known as J2EE, is a programming standard that uses Java language to support applications that enable enterprise programs to reach suppliers, customers and employees via Internet browsers See Web browser. . Many insurers believe the standard's proven scalability and strong interoperability The capability of two or more hardware devices or two or more software routines to work harmoniously together. For example, in an Ethernet network, display adapters, hubs, switches and routers from different vendors must conform to the Ethernet standard and interoperate with each other. are a winning combination. While Microsoft's .NET, which helps companies build enterprise Web services (1) Loosely, any online service delivered over the Web. Such usage appears in articles from non-technical sources, but not in IT-oriented publications, because definition #2 below describes the correct use of the term. , is newer to the market than J2EE, users say it's a cheaper, relatively simple programming model that allows various programming languages to communicate with one another. The two enterprise architectures have differences, but their strong interoperability is positioning both well for Web services. In fact, the growing phenomenon of Web services as the standard for doing business over the Internet Internet Publicly accessible computer network connecting many smaller networks from around the world. It grew out of a U.S. Defense Department program called ARPANET (Advanced Research Projects Agency Network), established in 1969 with connections between computers at the makes both .NET and J2EE must-haves for some insurers. Other insurers, however, have made a choice. For FCCI FCCI Fellowship of Companies for Christ International FCCI Federation of Chambers of Commerce and Industry FCCI Fuel-Cladding Chemical Interaction FCCI Federation des Comites de Coordination de Independantistes Insurance Group, based in Sarasota, Fla., interoperability was a key factor in its decision to select J2EE, while Pacific Life Insurance Co. is finding value in .NET's reusability The ability to use all or the greater part of the same programming code or system design in another application. reusability - reuse and programming language neutrality. "Technology providers also see different values in the two platforms. "There is no door No. 3 choice; companies have to pick one or the other," said Randy Wheeler, founder and chief executive officer of Valley Oak Systems Inc., a national provider of claims management software, services and support. Because of its maturity and stability, J2EE is a more established technology, while NET still has to answer the question of "let's prove it" he said. Doug Massey, vice president of insurance services for Blue Frog You can help Wikipedia by removing weasel words. Solutions, an e-business solutions provider, believes .NET language and development tools are much easier to work with. Allstate is one of the insurers who are finding value in both platforms, recognizing the two to be complementary. The company integrated J2EE language, through deployment of IBM's WebSphere 4.5, to manage the infrastructure and support Web services to enable development of business applications and existing mainframe applications into its .NET technologies. IBM's WebSphere Application Server is the dominant system that insurers use for Java development and deployment. The growing use of J2EE, .NET and WebSphere among insurers will be examined in three separate sessions at this year's E-Fusion conference. |
|
||||||||||||||||||

Printer friendly
Cite/link
Email
Feedback
Reader Opinion