On faith and freedom: Ashcroft's omission. (Editorials).In a Jan. 13 address in Denver, Attorney General John Ashcroft John David Ashcroft (born May 9 1942) is an American politician who was the 79th United States Attorney General. He served during the first term of President George W. Bush from 2001 until 2005. Ashcroft was previously the Governor of Missouri (1985 – 1993) and a U.S. rolled out the usual arguments on behalf of the Bush administration's "faith-based" initiative. Churches and other religious groups, he said, have offered medical care, education and other social services social services Noun, pl welfare services provided by local authorities or a state agency for people with particular social needs social services npl → servicios mpl sociales to Americans for many years. They do a great job, he insisted, and they should be eligible for federal funding. "For the first time in a long time," said Ashcroft, "our leaders in Washington understand what Americans of all religious backgrounds have long held to be true: Through faith, all things are possible." To bolster his case, Ashcroft relied on a comment from that much-quoted 19th-century observer of American life, Alexis de Toqueville. De Toqueville, said the attorney general, was struck by the American spirit of service, noting that this regard for others "prompts them to assist one another and inclines them willingly to sacrifice a portion of their time and property for the welfare of others." What Ashcroft did not tell his audience is de Toqueville's view on the role of church-state separation and its importance in our national life. In his book Democracy in America De la démocratie en Amérique (published in two volumes, the first in 1835 and the second in 1840) is a classic French text by Alexis de Tocqueville on the United States in the 1830s and its strengths and weaknesses. , de Toqueville said he was struck by the positive role of religion in American society. "In France," he said, "I had almost always seen the spirit of religion and the spirit of freedom marching in Marching In is a science fiction short story by Isaac Asimov. The story was written at the request of the US publication 'High Fidelity', with the stipulation that it be 2,500 words long, set twenty-five years in the future and deal with an aspect of sound recording. opposite directions. But in America I found they were intimately united and they reigned in common over the same country." During his tour of the young nation, he asked clergy of many different denominations why things were different in America. "[T]hey all attributed the peaceful dominion dominion, power to rule, or that which is subject to rule. Before 1949 the term was used officially to describe the self-governing countries of the Commonwealth of Nations—e.g., Canada, Australia, or India. of religion in their country mainly to the separation of church and state
He concluded, "In Europe, Christianity has been intimately united to the powers of the earth. Those powers are now in decay, and it is, as it were, buried bur·y tr.v. bur·ied, bur·y·ing, bur·ies 1. To place in the ground: bury a bone. 2. a. To place (a corpse) in a grave, a tomb, or the sea; inter. b. under their ruins." Thus, de Toqueville came to the same conclusion as that of Thomas Jefferson, James Madison and others among our nation's founders: Both religion and freedom flourish when the institutions of faith and government are kept separate. Religion, he determined, is influential in America because it is not tied to partisan Partisan may refer to: Political matters In politics, partisan literally means organized into political parties. The expression "Partisan politics" usually refers to fervent, sometimes militant support of a party, cause, faction, person, or idea. politics and state power. The current goal of the Bush administration--a "faith-based" regime where religion and government are merged--flies in the face of American tradition and jeopardizes that delicate balance between faith and freedom that has stood the test of time. Ashcroft and others in the administration openly seek to harness religion and use it to achieve a political agenda. This is a tragic and dangerous mistake, and Americans who love freedom must resist this initiative with all our might. |
|
||||||||||||||||

Printer friendly
Cite/link
Email
Feedback
Reader Opinion