Printer Friendly
The Free Library
14,633,203 articles and books
Member login
User name  
Password 
 
Join us Forgot password?

Oliver v. Powell.


U.S. District Court

LIMITATION

CENSORSHIP

INSPECTION OF MAIL

READING OF MAIL

Oliver v. Powell, 250 F.Supp.2d 593 (E.D.Va. 2002). A prisoner brought a civil rights action alleging various constitutional violations. The prisoner and the defendants moved for summary judgment. The district court granted summary judgment in favor of the defendants on all of the prisoner's claims. The court upheld the prison policy of opening and reading inmates' incoming general correspondence, finding it was content neutral and that it was reasonably related to legitimate penological pe·nol·o·gy also poe·nol·o·gy  
n.
The study, theory, and practice of prison management and criminal rehabilitation.



[Latin poena, penalty (from Greek
 interests in maintaining security and discipline and in suppressing contraband contraband, in international law, goods necessary or useful in the prosecution of war that a belligerent may lawfully seize from a neutral who is attempting to deliver them to the enemy. . The court also upheld the prison regulation that limited the size and weight of incoming general correspondence, to one envelope and one ounce, finding that it did not violate the prisoner's First Amendment rights. The court noted that the regulation was a reasonable response to the need to expedite ex·pe·dite  
tr.v. ex·pe·dit·ed, ex·pe·dit·ing, ex·pe·dites
1. To speed up the progress of; accelerate.

2.
 mail processing time, preventing a strain on prison resources, and that no ready alternatives were presented. The court approved of the prison regulation that authorized au·thor·ize  
tr.v. au·thor·ized, au·thor·iz·ing, au·thor·iz·es
1. To grant authority or power to.

2. To give permission for; sanction:
 personnel to open, examine, and censor censor (sĕn`sər), title of two magistrates of ancient Rome (from c.443 B.C. to the time of Domitian). They took the census (by which they assessed taxation, voting, and military service) and supervised public behavior.  any outgoing prisoner mail upon reasonable suspicion Reasonable suspicion is a legal standard in United States law that a person has been, is, or is about to be, engaged in criminal activity based on specific and articulable facts and inferences.  of illegal activity, noting that the regulation was narrowly drawn to reach only material that might pose a security risk to inmates, officials, and the institution. (Southampton Correctional Center, Virginia)
COPYRIGHT 2003 CRS, Inc.
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2003, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:prisoner alleges violation of his constitutional violations
Publication:Corrections Caselaw Quarterly
Article Type:Brief Article
Geographic Code:1U5VA
Date:Aug 1, 2003
Words:216
Previous Article:Knight v. Keane.(prisoner sues superintendent of a correctional facility )(Brief Article)
Next Article:Canadian Coalition Against Death Penalty v. Ryan.(MAIL)(Brief Article)
Topics:



Related Articles
U.S. Appeals Court: DISCIPLINE.(Brief Article)
U.S. Appeals Court: WORK.(prisoners and prisons)(Brief Article)
U.S. District Court: DUE PROCESS.(prisoners and prisons)(Brief Article)
U.S. Appeals Court: DISCIPLINE.(Brief Article)
U.S. Appeals Court: DISCIPLINE REMOVAL FROM JOB.(prisoners and prisons)(Brief Article)
Conditions of confinement.(Brief Article)
Failure to protect.
Food.(Brief Article)
Sentence.(Brief Article)
Neal v. Lewis.(prisoner alleges prison officials of violating his constitutional rights)(Brief Article)

Terms of use | Copyright © 2009 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters | Submit articles