Ohio's Religious Motto Ruled Unconstitutional By U.S. Appeals Court.Ohio's use of the phrase "With God, all things are possible "With God, all things are possible" is the state motto of the U.S. state of Ohio. It is derived from the Gospel of Matthew, Chapter 19, Verse 26. It has repeatedly come under fire due to claims that it violates the separation of church and state. " as the state motto violates the separation of church and state
The U.S. 6th Circuit Court of Appeals ruled 2-1 April 25 that the motto is a quote from Jesus found in the New Testament and is thus an endorsement of Christianity. The passage in question comes from Matthew 19:26 and deals with one of the central teachings of Jesus on how one can get into Heaven. Judge Avern Cohn, writing for the court, said, "In the context in which the words of the motto are found -- as the words of Jesus speaking of salvation -- to a reasonable observer, they must be seen as advancing, or at a minimum, showing a `particular affinity' for Christianity. Simply put, they are an endorsement of the Christian religion by the State of Ohio. No other interpretation in the context of their presence in the New Testament is possible." Continued Cohn, "In sum, fairly read and understood, the State of Ohio has adopted a motto which crosses the line from evenhandedness toward all religions, to a preference for Christianity, in the form of Christian text. Thus, it is an endorsement of Christianity by the State of Ohio." The motto, first adopted by Ohio in 1959, was inspired by a New Testament quote which reads, "But Jesus beheld be·held v. Past tense and past participle of behold. beheld Verb the past of behold beheld behold them and said unto them, with men this is impossible; but with God, all things are possible." It appears on some state letterhead and on tax returns. In 1998 the motto was engraved en·grave tr.v. en·graved, en·grav·ing, en·graves 1. To carve, cut, or etch into a material: engraved the champion's name on the trophy. 2. into a bronze plaque and installed on a walkway leading into the statehouse in Columbus, the state capital. Then-Gov. George V. Voinovich said he took the action after a trade mission to India where he saw a public building displaying the words, "Government Work is God's Work." Dissenting Judge David Nelson said he considered the Ohio motto similar to the use of "In God We Trust" on U.S. currency. The case was brought by the Rev. Matthew Peterson, a Presbyterian minister in Cleveland, with assistance from the American Civil Liberties Union American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), nonpartisan organization devoted to the preservation and extension of the basic rights set forth in the U.S. Constitution. of Ohio. The ruling overturned a 1998 federal district court decision that the motto met constitutional standards so long as the state did not cite its biblical origin. Barry W. Lynn Reverend Barry W. Lynn (born 1948 in Bethlehem, Pennsylvania) has been the Executive Director of Americans United for Separation of Church and State since 1992.[1] , executive director of Americans United, hailed the appellate ruling. "All the Constitution requires is for government to be neutral on religion," said Lynn. "Making scripture the state motto is obviously not government neutrality. This case was a no-brainer." The court of appeals noted that many other states mention "God" in a variety of contexts but pointed out that Ohio is the only state that directly quotes the Christian Bible in its state motto. Concluded AU's Lynn, "The state of Ohio, which represents a broad and diverse population of many faiths, has no business promoting the Christian Bible or giving it official recognition. As a minister, when I'm looking for spiritual guidance, the last place I'd look is to state government." The Family Research Council, a Washington-based Religious Right group, was infuriated in·fu·ri·ate tr.v. in·fu·ri·at·ed, in·fu·ri·at·ing, in·fu·ri·ates To make furious; enrage. adj. Archaic Furious. by the ruling in the ACLU ACLU: see American Civil Liberties Union. v. Capitol Square case. In an e-mail newsletter called CultureFacts, the FRC FRC abbr. functional residual capacity FRC see functional residual capacity. asserted that the court ruled incorrectly because "there is no `wall of separation' between church and state." According to the FRC, all the First Amendment was intended to do was bar the establishment of a national church. |
|
||||||||||||||||

Printer friendly
Cite/link
Email
Feedback
Reader Opinion