Printer Friendly
The Free Library
4,548,385 articles and books
Member login
User name  
Password 
 
Join us Forgot password?

Oh no you can't: amateur propagandists in the YouTube age.


IT'S difficult to remember, I know, but not too long ago, before computers and word-processing software, hopeful screenwriters had to type their scripts on a typewriter. It was a frustrating pain in the neck, frankly, because the professional format of a screenplay is a complicated mess involving lots of tabs and dialogue margins, eccentric capitalization rules, right-side justification for scene transitions, that sort of thing.

On the other hand, it kept the riff-raff out. The physical tortures of typing the script format were a formidable barrier to entry. You had to really love your script idea to put up with it.

Today, anyone with a script idea and a few dollars can buy a copy of Final Draft and type merrily away, confident that margins, character names, scene transitions, all of it will be instantly--effortlessly--put into place. Anyone with a few dollars more, for that matter, can buy a digital movie camera and elementary editing software like iMovie or Final Cut, and make his own finished movie. If it's short enough, and stupid enough, and on YouTube, it will find an audience. YouTube videos are the sub-prime mortgages of the entertainment business--made possible only because of rapid advances in technology and communication, they're everywhere, and cheap, and they seem harmless. Everybody's doing it.

Just ask Barack Obama. For the past few months, he's been the toast of web video. Talented amateurs--the "Obama Girl," for instance--have been putting up fun, goofy mash notes on YouTube and other places, reinforcing the image of Barack Obama as the cool, progressive grassroots choice. Most of these are sloppy but effective--highly personal declarations of devotion to a presidential candidate--but what's most arresting about these amateur offerings is how emotional and needy the filmmakers seem. The Barack Experience is a little like the Beatles on Ed Sullivan: What you remember aren't the songs, but the tears and the screaming.

It's usually the other way around. It's usually the candidate with the greasy, hysterical smile; it's usually the candidate who seems grasping and desperate and hungry. When Hillary Clinton works the rope line--but let's not single her out; the same could be said of pretty much any recent presidential hopeful--she's got that pleading, maniacal, vote-begging look in her eye that we instantly recognize as the sign of someone who really, really, really needs to win this one.

And yet Barack Obama glides through these videos--and the campaign in general--in composed, unruffled sleekness. He's what pop psychologists call "emotionally unavailable." He's too cool for school, which is why he inspires such nutty, over-the-top fanaticism. The YouTube amateurs, and the voters who stream them, react to this the way twelve-year-old girls react to the remote boy who ignores them: They go nuts; they spin fantasies; they doodle hearts on their binders; they make home movies.

Homemade web videos are the fan clubs of the digital generation, and it's amazing to reflect on just how simple it is these days--a few clicks of the mouse, a broadband connection--to make and broadcast a fairly polished video product. Not too long ago, being a charter member of the Senator John F. Kennedy for President Fan Club entailed a lot of door-knocking and envelope-licking and phone-banking. But, of course, it didn't make you a star. And that's the odd aspect to the Barack Obama web-video devotionals: In each of them, the candidate isn't the star. The filmmaker is.

"Yes We Can," a web video currently popping up all over the place, is part music video, part celebrity endorsement. The leader of the Black Eyed Peas (you've heard them, right? Right?!), a guy who goes by the URL-sounding name of will.i.am, sets one of Obama's stemwinders to music, and the result is a great-looking Gap ad of a campaign video--handheld, black-and-white (of course; this is serious business, you know?), lots of solemn famous faces peering out at you, a guy with a guitar, that sort of thing.

I'm vaguely aware of the basic demographic profile of the typical NATIONAL REVIEW reader, and there's about a .003 percent chance you're going to recognize anybody on this video, except maybe Scarlett Johansson and Kareem Abdul-Jabbar, so you're just going to have to trust me when I tell you that these are famous people, all of them, and they want you to vote for Obama.

Which is something you'll have to keep reminding yourself, because Obama himself makes a pretty truncated appearance on this video. "Show the product" is one of the first tenets of advertising, but in the recent "Yes We Can" video, the product never gets the screen to himself. The most he usually gets is one-half of the space, in a split-screen, flanked by famous people looking serious and committed, furrowing their brows to the beat of the catchy "Yes We Can" tune playing underneath.

Toward the end of the video, the image of Obama disappears completely. It's just his voice on the track, but the whole screen is devoted instead to more brow-furrowing, more solemnity, more famous faces. "Yes, yes," you can hear them saying, "he's inspiring, he's wonderful. But enough about him. Isn't it cool how into him I am?" Me. That's, ultimately, the creepy thing about all of the Obama videos floating around the net. The chilly, smooth, monochrome candidate is in the background. And that's a big change from the sweaty attention-hogging candidates--and presidents--we've become used to.

I have an actor friend who, early in his career, attended a very popular, respected acting class. On the first day, the teacher arrived in a tight black leotard and a million scarves and he (yes; he) told the class to stand up. "Now, each of you," he trilled, "wrap your arms around yourself and give yourself a big, hurting hug. And repeat: wonderful, wonderful me!"

Because, you know, that's a problem we have out here in Hollywood: We just don't love ourselves enough.

Malignant narcissism isn't confined to the borders of Los Angeles County. It's a nationwide epidemic--on reality shows, talk shows, blogs, podcasts, the message is always the same: Pay attention to me, to wonderful, wonderful me. That's a big part of Obama's appeal. He lets it be about us. And if there's only one thing an Obama fan loves more than Obama, it's his wonderful, wonderful self.
COPYRIGHT 2008 National Review, Inc.
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2008 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:2008 II
Author:Long, Rob
Publication:National Review
Geographic Code:1USA
Date:Apr 7, 2008
Words:1049
Previous Article:Unknown quantity: are the Democrats gambling a mystery man?(2008 )(Barack Obama )
Next Article:The power of 41: senator McConnell fights for the filibuster.(CONGRESS)(Mitch McConnell)
Topics:

Terms of use | Copyright © 2008 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters | Submit articles