Printer Friendly
The Free Library
14,694,313 articles and books
Member login
User name  
Password 
 
Join us Forgot password?

Off base?


I usually tend to downplay worries about research in genetics, but I was quite concerned after reading "Expanding the genetic code" (SN: 4/2/05, p. 222). The researchers surely have plans to keep whatever they create contained. But adding a fifth base to the DNA DNA: see nucleic acid.
DNA
 or deoxyribonucleic acid

One of two types of nucleic acid (the other is RNA); a complex organic compound found in all living cells and many viruses. It is the chemical substance of genes.
 of bacteria with a genetic mutation Noun 1. genetic mutation - (genetics) any event that changes genetic structure; any alteration in the inherited nucleic acid sequence of the genotype of an organism
chromosomal mutation, mutation
 rate 10,000 times that of normal bacteria seems unnecessarily dangerous. I guess my concerns were primed by "Quick Fix: How invasive seaweed repairs its wounds" (SN: 4/2/05, p. 214), which discusses an "alien green alga green alga
n.
Any of the numerous algae of the division Chlorophyta, such as spirogyra and sea lettuce, that have chlorophyll unmasked by other pigments.
 that's currently wreaking havoc in the Mediterranean Sea."

ANDY ANDY Andrew
ANDY US Popular Abbreviation for Andrews AFB
 OLESIN, PRINCETON, MASS.

The concerns connect in your articles about man-made seaweed and scientists creating a fifth base for DNA in bacteria. These human-modified species get loose, and bad things happen.

GIL GIL Global Interpreter Lock (to protect Python objects from being modified from multiple threads at once)
GIL Gerenciador de Informações Locais (Brasil) 
 STEVENS, FAIRVIEW, TEXAS

It's unlikely that a bacterium would survive with such a high mutation rate. What's more, should such modified organisms make their way into the environment, they would need a constant supply of 3-fluorobenzene, and there's none of that chemical in the environment. Furthermore, the seaweed wasn't genetically modified.
COPYRIGHT 2005 Science Service, Inc.
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2005, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:LETTERS
Author:Goho, A.
Publication:Science News
Article Type:Letter to the Editor
Date:May 21, 2005
Words:182
Previous Article:Just a thought.(LETTERS)(Letter to the Editor)
Next Article:Proteins' promise: new test could reveal early ovarian cancer.(This Week)(ovarian cancer diagnostic tool)



Related Articles
E-mail: Is it a blessing or curse?
That drama of letter writing: dramatization of 150 years of letters to the editor surprised the audience by how little life has changed -- and...
It's a cheap form of propaganda: now they are offering prizes to people who trick newspapers into publishing fake letters.(Masthead Symposium)
Many fight a lonely battle: let's keep real voices, original writing, and unique perspectives in our letters.(Turf wars: the editor strikes back)
An e-mail conversation: how to deal with letter-planters; let's try the Town Square rule for determining legitimate letters.(Turf wars: the editor...
How to reject a letter writer.(Convention 2004)
BFF blues.(We've Got Mail!)(Letter to the Editor)
New research on the nature of letters and their writers.(Letter-writing demography)
Not another Christmas letter! Those annual holiday missives don't have to be your father's Christmas letter.(practicing catholic)
Turf or astroturf? A look at the scope of the "canned letter" phenomenon.(letters to the editor campaigns)

Terms of use | Copyright © 2009 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters | Submit articles