Of Moths and Men: The Untold Story of Science and the Peppered Moth.JUDITH HOOPER About the same time that Charles Darwin was tracking finches of the Galapagos to make his case for natural selection, a mutant form of the peppered moth The peppered moth (Biston betularia) is a temperate species of night-flying moth. Peppered moth evolution is often used by educators as an example of natural selection. Ecology and life cycle In Britain, the peppered moth is univoltine (i.e. , Biston betularia, appeared on trees in the industrialized in·dus·tri·al·ize v. in·dus·tri·al·ized, in·dus·tri·al·iz·ing, in·dus·tri·al·iz·es v.tr. 1. To develop industry in (a country or society, for example). 2. midlands of England. These moths were significantly darker than the pale moths that populated the region before the tree trunks became blackened black·en v. black·ened, black·en·ing, black·ens v.tr. 1. To make black. 2. To sully or defame: a scandal that blackened the mayor's name. 3. by factory soot. The change in color seemed to camouflage the darker moths against the tree trunks, so birds had a harder time finding them. Scientists at the time hypothesized that these moths were hard evidence for Darwin's theory but didn't do experiments to prove it. In the mid-1950s, geneticist ge·net·i·cist n. A specialist in genetics. geneticist a specialist in genetics. geneticist E.B. Ford, the founder of the Oxford School of Ecological Genetics, recruited a physician named Bernard Kettlewell Henry Bernard Davis Kettlewell (24 February 1907 - 1979) was a British geneticist, lepidopterist and medical doctor, who carried out important research into the influence of industrial melanism on natural selection in moths, showing why moths are darker in polluted areas. to do an in-depth study of the moths and whether they were proof of evolution. Kettlewell's findings seemed to show conclusively that the moths were "Darwin's missing evidence." Hooper turns an investigative eye on the peppered-moth experiment. She finds that in the 50 years since Kettlewell published his findings, his results have been difficult to reproduce, and there have been valid, albeit quiet, challenges to his work. Hooper also recounts the rivalries, jealousies, and ambitions of the lepidopterists involved in the work that may have tainted the findings. Norton, 2002, 377 p., hardcover, $26.95. |
|
||||||||||||||

Printer friendly
Cite/link
Email
Feedback
Reader Opinion